Re: MV

2003-02-25 Thread Steve Desjardins
I bought the MV with the 40 f2.8 for $100 in San Francisco in 1981. If was a small, light camera that performed well for many years, until the advance clutch broke in 2000. Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458

Re: MV

2003-02-25 Thread Keefer Photography
Is the Pentax MV any good? Just curious...-- People may tell you otherwise, as it's a totally uncool camera by pro wannabee standards. I love my MV. It's very light, meters well, is unobstrusive and fits all my Pentax lenses. You basically don't set anything on it except the manual focus, so

MV

2003-02-24 Thread Steve Pearson
Is the Pentax MV any good? Just curious... Thanks __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/

Re: MV

2003-02-24 Thread Peter Alling
It's essentially a stripped down ME, as such it's as good as an ME. I've been happy with the one I have for it's purposes. At 09:47 PM 2/24/2003 -0800, you wrote: Is the Pentax MV any good? Just curious... Thanks __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax

Re: My MV just died - For free Thursdays?

2002-10-18 Thread frank theriault
I've had a few offers trickle in overnight. It's gone to an Old Pentax Bodies Retirement Home in Dave Letterman's home town. It'll be with others of his kind. It should be happy now... regards, frank frank theriault wrote: Shutter won't fire. Meter lights still come on, but the film

Re: Rewind knob for MV

2002-04-05 Thread frank theriault
PROTECTED] wrote: Frank, I don't have a MV, but my recollection is that the MV, MG, and ME are all the same body. You might ask if anyone has a rewind knob from these. Regards, Bob S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My el cheapo Ebay MV seems to work just fine (although I'll know for sure when I

Rewind knob for MV

2002-04-05 Thread Rfsindg
Frank, I don't have a MV, but my recollection is that the MV, MG, and ME are all the same body. You might ask if anyone has a rewind knob from these. Regards, Bob S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My el cheapo Ebay MV seems to work just fine (although I'll know for sure when I get back my

Re: Rewind knob for MV

2002-04-05 Thread Rfsindg
Frank, Ya, I watched that auction for a while but didn't end up bidding. Didn't it have some lens or winder with it? I figured it should be an easy fix. I just replaced the rewind knob on a Super Program and it was really simple. Just get the axle past the retaining clip and screw on the

Re: Rewind knob for MV

2002-04-05 Thread frank theriault
figured that for $20, the MV was worth it for the lens alone. If the body worked: bonus! The buyer said he didn't know if the body worked, because he didn't have batteries for it. As it turns out, the body seems fine - except the rewind knob. At $20, it wasn't much of a gamble, but I think I came

Re: MV batteries

2002-02-12 Thread William Robb
2 S76 / A 76, or 1 DL1/3N. William Robb - Original Message - From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:44 PM Subject: MV batteries Hi, Just got an MV today that I bought on eBay. It has no batteries in it - which is why

MV batteries

2002-02-11 Thread frank theriault
Hi, Just got an MV today that I bought on eBay. It has no batteries in it - which is why it was so cheap ($20 with an m 2.0 50mm). As I said before, I really got it for the lens, to put on my new MX. The MV body is a bonus. Anyone out there know which batteries go into it? thanks, frank

Re: MV batteries

2002-02-11 Thread John Glover
Same as the ME I'd guess, as the MV is basically a striped down version of the ME. At one time I owned an MG, which I believe is the model in between the MV and ME and it was a pretty decent little camera. John - Original Message - From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: MV batteries

2002-02-11 Thread T Rittenhouse
Which probably means an S76, 357, etc. Ciao, Graywolf - Original Message - From: John Glover [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 10:25 PM Subject: Re: MV batteries Same as the ME I'd

Re: MV batteries

2002-02-11 Thread Gary Murphy
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:44:10 -0500, frank theriault wrote: Just got an MV today that I bought on eBay. It has no batteries in it - which is why it was so cheap ($20 with an m 2.0 50mm). As I said before, I really got it for the lens, to put on my new MX. The MV body is a bonus. The L44

Re: MV batteries

2002-02-11 Thread Bgpentax
In a message dated 2/11/2002 9:54:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just got an MV today that I bought on eBay. It has no batteries in it - which is why it was so cheap ($20 with an m 2.0 50mm). As I said before, I really got it for the lens, to put on my new MX

Re: MV batteries

2002-02-11 Thread Ken Archer
I have been using a single CR-1/3N 3 volt lithium battery to replace two of the other batteries you mentioned and I get a lot better service out of it. It is also usually cheaper than the two it replaces. I use them in the ME Supers and ME that I have. On Monday 11 February 2002 10:00 pm,

Re: MV batteries

2002-02-11 Thread Peter Alling
I was taking that into account. At 11:18 PM 2/11/2002 -0600, you wrote: Yeah, but you are buying two 357s compared to the one CR-1/3N I buy. On Monday 11 February 2002 10:55 pm, Peter Alling wrote: It must depend where you are, and where you shop. I can usually find the 357 cells for less

Re: MV batteries

2002-02-11 Thread John Glover
Thanks Tom, I couldn't remember the specs off hand.. - Original Message - From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 10:00 PM Subject: Re: MV batteries Which probably means an S76, 357, etc. Ciao, Graywolf

<    1   2