Bruce,
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Martin,
>
> One other thing to consider is that the mirror is out of alignment on
> the body. This could account for the discrepency between manual and
> auto focus. Have you tried manual focus shots and autofocus shots and
> compared them on film or just through
Ed,
Ed Mathews wrote:
> In short, yes I've noticed your exact problem, and sold most of my
> Pentax gear because of it me now>. The problem is more noticeable at further distances, and it
> varies from lens to lens and camera to camera.
This is very helpful, thanks. I will add that I
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Paris, Leonard wrote:
> I'd rather think that the problems are being caused by unfamiliarity with
> cameras using more than a central area for autofocussing. I got so used to
> locking focus on my subject and then recomposing for the shot that, when I
> got to use a Can
Leonard
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:12 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Misfocussing with 43mm limited?
>
>
> I'd rather think that the problems are being caused by
> unfamiliarity with cameras using more than a central area for
>
TED]
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 11:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Misfocussing with 43mm limited?
>
>
> Ed,
> Maybe it's time for the MZ-Sn? In any case this is very bad.
> Do you have any experience with the PZ-1p or the PZ-1?
> I hav
Monday, February 11, 2002, 9:01:09 PM, Mick wrote:
MM> Alan Chan wrote:
>>I found out by using the split image screen from the MZ-M
MM> Which in itself has the potential for upsetting an AF mechanism, (according
MM> to Pentax).
That's strange...
Pentax repair techs told me so much nonsense alre
* From: wendy beard
>* Subject: Re: Misfocussing with 43mm limited?
>* Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 05:19:16 -0800
>
>
> I took my MZ-S / 43mm combo out shooting on Saturday.
> What I found was that it was particularly difficult for me to get the focus
> on the par
> >I found out by using the split image screen from the MZ-M
>
>Which in itself has the potential for upsetting an AF mechanism, (according
>to Pentax).
But then the AF sensor is below the mirror and I fail to see why?
regards,
Alan Chan
_
At 06:45 11-2-2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Since returning home to York yesterday I have
>had the opportunity to try my wife's 28-70 f4 from her MZ-5N on the MZ-S
>and the 43 mm lens on her camera. My immediate impression is that the
>focus with the zoom on the MZ-S was bang on (not to mention very ra
Hi Pål,
Pål Audun Jensen wrote:
> I've not noticed similar behavior with the MZ-S and the 43 Limited, but
> then I never use AF with the 43mm.
> Is this problem constant?
Pretty much - occasionally it appears to focus correctly, but only in
the near field. It is always quite noticeable off
10 matches
Mail list logo
