It seems he finally photographed the product he is selling. OTOH, I
feel like it no longer fits the description of brand new, as he has
pretty much had to open the box and take it out to photograph it, no
;-) ?
Frantisek (feeling evil today)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:57 PM
Subject: Check it out!!! (Re: More image theft...)
Thank you all for your help!!! Too bad it's not Friday, but it's a good
lauch...
Cheers,
Boz
Steve Knobbe wrote:
Not to beat a dead horse, but this guy is not only stealing your
image, but he's linking
Graywolf wrote:
The US copyright law makes it clear that you have to register the object
with the copyright office before you have the right to pursue legal
redress
Hi Tom,
Actually, that's not correct. Your rights are protected whether you
register your work or not. In fact, you are no
/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: More image theft... (Dario Bonazza, now he's got yours)
Hi folks
My understanding is that you are both correct.
Regards,
Bob...
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Graywolf wrote:
The US copyright law makes it clear that you have to register the object
with the copyright office before you have the right to pursue legal
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More image theft... (Dario Bonazza, now he's got yours)
Hi folks,
Just look at it now :-)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
Dario Bonazza
-
This message is from
- Original Message -
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 8:22 AM
Subject: RE: More image theft...
Graywolf wrote:
The US copyright law makes it clear that you have to register the object
re: copyright
http://www.eff.org/Intellectual_property/asmp_copyright.paper
is the ASMP paper on copyright for photographers
Doug
search engine junky
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Yeah this was a treat!
I think I'm just as glad I missed the porn :)
annsan
Ah, these guys must be pretty uptight. It wasn't porn, more like glamour
photography. Nice looking girl, that's all. I kind of liked it. Better
looking body than that ugly camera. :)
Bob
-
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More image theft... (Dario Bonazza, now he's got yours)
Hi folks,
Just look at it now :-)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
Dario Bonazza
Hi Boz,
it would be nice if you had a picture of the camera broken to BITS,
something like Bill Robb's picture of 645 Mamiya ;-))
With the pic you put there, you might have actually HELPED the guy
to sell it ;-) OTOH, he could be sued for not including the item
that's shown in the
Did he link to you and you sent him to a brothel? Well none!
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Bojidar Dimitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:57 PM
Subject: Check it out!!! (Re: More image theft...)
Thank you all for your help!!! Too bad it's
In a message dated 12/03/02 06:01:32 GMT Standard Time, John writes:
I like this one...BTW, for those interested, eBay does have a policy
regarding image theft and unauthorized linkage of your image to another's
auction. If Boz complains, eBay should stop this guy from using the
I was thinking of a Kodak disposable (preferably one that's been left out in the
rain or something).
Len Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rather than porn, I'd put in an image of a Leica M6 and see what
that would cause.
Len
---
Ooh. There's an easy way to extract delicious revenge for
that!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: More image theft...
What's the URL for the auction
12, 2002 2:57 AM
Subject: Check it out!!! (Re: More image theft...)
Thank you all for your help!!! Too bad it's not Friday, but it's a good
lauch...
Cheers,
Boz
Steve Knobbe wrote:
Not to beat a dead horse, but this guy is not only stealing your
image, but he's linking directly
Check out the cool photo now ... rotflmao
Steve Larson wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html
-
This message is from
HAHA
You guys are evil.
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out the cool photo now ... rotflmao
Steve Larson wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
Evil! Pure and simple from the eighth dimension!
HAHA
You guys are evil.
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out the cool photo now ... rotflmao
Steve Larson wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This
Factory fresh! New battery! Woo hoo!
tv
On 12 Mar 2002 at 6:51, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Check out the cool photo now ... rotflmao
Steve Larson wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
That's a Testino, isn't it?
m
Brendan wrote:
HAHA
You guys are evil.
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out the cool photo now ... rotflmao
Steve Larson wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
--
Shel Belinkoff
Or maybe it's a decisive moment.
Brendan wrote:
HAHA
You guys are evil.
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out the cool photo now ... rotflmao
Steve Larson wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
--
Shel Belinkoff
Call me a snob but I would not even consider purchasing anything from someone
unable to spell roll of film.
ditto video's, cd's, dvd's etc.
Kind regard's
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Oh no! He's now stolen his image drom Dario!
What a turd!
tv
On 12 Mar 2002 at 6:51, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Check out the cool photo now ... rotflmao
Steve Larson wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Paris, Leonard wrote:
What was it? I just looked and it's a picture of a PZ-10.
He who snoozes, loses (giggle)
Stephen (grinning, ducking and running)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
-Original Message-
From: Brendan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More image theft...
HAHA
You guys are evil.
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out the cool photo now ... rotflmao
Steve
tom wrote:
Oh no! He's now stolen his image drom Dario!
The problem is that noone has bid on his auction, and he can change the
HTML. Anyone brave enough to bid on a redhead? I'll get Dario to
change his image.
Cheers,
Boz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Um, I don't understand what's so funny about the new photo. It's still
a ZX-10. Why not replace it with a different photo . . . maybe like a
NIKON, since he's double listed this auction in Nikon.
tom wrote:
Factory fresh! New battery! Woo hoo!
tv
On 12 Mar 2002 at 6:51, Shel
He has not stolen any images. He has merely linked to images. It's possible to provide
images for your sites that can not be linked to if this is important to you. If you
don't
want someone linking to your images, make your site a tiny bit more sophisticated. Make
the folder that contains the
Whats also funny is he's selling a PZ-10 for more than
a newer MZ-7 and about as much as I got my MZ-3 for.
Dario hurry up and change you image :-)
--- William Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, I don't understand what's so funny about the
new photo. It's still
a ZX-10. Why not replace it
You're too slow, Bill ...
Boz changed it to a soft porn photo which stayed up for a while, then
the seller stole a photo from Dario, which is what's up now. Perhaps
Dario will get the message soon enough and complain to eBay and change
the image.
William Kane wrote:
Um, I don't understand
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: More image theft...
tom wrote:
Oh no! He's now stolen his image drom Dario!
The problem is that noone has bid on his auction, and he can change the
HTML. Anyone brave enough to bid on a redhead? I'll get Dario
if you are really after his case, bid and retract immediately (u can say
oops, wrong window). Once a bid is placed, you cannot change the
original listing even if bids have been retracted or cancelled.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 06:08:21PM +0100, Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
tom wrote:
Oh no!
According to eBay rules, links to images WITHOUT PERMISSION of the image
owner, is not allowed. I suspect Boz would have been happy to authorize
a link, which would then have been a win-win situation for all
involved. By taking an image without asking permission, and in fact
doing it twice,
Looks like he's linking directly to another site. The AHOC to be exact.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
At 06:37 AM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
In a message dated 12/03/02 06:01:32 GMT Standard Time, John writes:
I like this one...BTW, for those interested,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Bob Blakely wrote:
He has not stolen any images. He has merely linked to images. It's
possible to provide images for your sites that can not be linked to if
this is important to you. If you don't want someone linking to your
images, make your site a tiny bit more
Boz is within is right to change the image. But there is something to
HOW you do it that carries a certain message. Boz got his kicks out of
this alright but IMO, it could have been handled better.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:35:45AM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
According to eBay rules, links
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 12:37 PM, Bob Blakely wrote:
Originally, Boz got free press for his site and another step up the
site authority ladder
outside our own small, insular fraternity and with nothing lost from
his pocket. Now I'm
sure he has added to his reputation in another
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:43:58AM -0600, Chris Brogden wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Bob Blakely wrote:
He has not stolen any images. He has merely linked to images. It's
possible to provide images for your sites that can not be linked to if
this is important to you. If you don't want
If you browse through this seller's store he has used third party images
from all over the place on his auctions.
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
You missed the porn.
tv
On 12 Mar 2002 at 11:06, William Kane wrote:
Um, I don't understand what's so funny about the new photo. It's still
a ZX-10. Why not replace it with a different photo . . . maybe like a
NIKON, since he's double listed this auction in Nikon.
-
This message is from
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to eBay rules, links to images WITHOUT PERMISSION of the image
owner, is not allowed.
Understood. And he should abide by ebay rules when on ebay. Nevertheless your comment
is
irrelevent to the question of theft. That was the accusation found
actually this is interesting. IMO, An image included using the img
src= tags can neither be considered as a URL nor a link (u cant
click on it).
Actually, the address of the image is a URL; the URL is being
used inside an IMG tag instead of an HREF (link) tag, but the
where to go to
We all have opinions on such things. Many things are immoral, or despicable, or not
entirely kosher and should be condemned but are not necessarily illegal. Now, I may be
wrong. Perhaps the law does call this theft. Last I heard links were legal. Both Boz
and
ebay agree that they don't like it
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Bob Blakely wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Bob Blakely wrote:
As I said in a previous post, I was addressing the accusation of
theft, therefore it is NOT beside the point I was discussing. As I
also said in a previous post the seller should abide by ebay rules
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: More image theft...
actually this is interesting. IMO, An image included using the img
src= tags can
It would help if you include some context in your reply :) I get all
confused wondering what you are talking about.
Its saying URL or Link which made me wonder about the intent of the
rules. I dont think one can have a link without a url inside it but
legal language is known to say the same
From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, there is a basic assumption involved in links. That is, when you link
to someone's page, you are increasing traffic to his site, thus providing a
service to the owner of the page. Linking to an isolated image does nothing
for the web page owner.
Definitions may vary from nation to nation,
but theft by fraud is a class of theft here.
Collin
*
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:29:16 -0800
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More image theft...
He did not take an image
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[whatever]
All right. You've totally understood me. I'm too stupid to understand you. I can live
with
that.
Regards,
Bob...
Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity,
and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us
from
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 01:58:41PM -0500, T Rittenhouse wrote:
Well, there is a basic assumption involved in links. That is, when you link
to someone's page, you are increasing traffic to his site, thus providing a
service to the owner of the page. Linking to an isolated image does nothing
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Now, the question I have is can you code your site so that an isolated
image
can not be retrived. That is, so the only way it could be linked to would
be as a page where navigation to the rest of the site is available?
It's not a matter of HTML coding, it's web server
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 02:22 PM, Peter Alling wrote:
Aaron, I always knew you were a sick man.
Nah, I just blindly followed a link once...and never again.
HAR! Someone on PDML knew who Mr. Goatse is. That just made my day.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Very true, the average personal account doesn't give you this kind of control.
At 02:31 PM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Now, the question I have is can you code your site so that an isolated
image
can not be retrived. That is, so the only way it could be linked to would
://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: More image theft...
actually this is interesting
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Bob Blakely wrote:
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[whatever]
All right. You've totally understood me. I'm too stupid to understand
you. I can live with that.
Bob, you know that wasn't what I was trying to say.
Learn to read what is written. Learn to stop
: Re: More image theft...
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 01:54 PM, Bob Blakely wrote:
In other words, just because you infer something not said inside
something I have said
doesn't mean that I actually implied it.
Sorry, Bob, I did not mean to attach to you an opinion that is not yours
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 02:22 PM, Peter Alling wrote:
Aaron, I always knew you were a sick man.
Nah, I just blindly followed a link once...and never again.
I tracked it down on Google after you posted that, and man... that is one
insane
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:31:47PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Now, the question I have is can you code your site so that an isolated
image
can not be retrived. That is, so the only way it could be linked to would
be as a page where navigation to the rest of the site is
Graywolf asked:
Now, the question I have is can you code your site so that an isolated image
can not be retrived. That is, so the only way it could be linked to would be
as a page where navigation to the rest of the site is available?
Second technique that spring to my mind is to have the
.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More image theft...
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 01:54 PM, Bob Blakely wrote:
In other words, just because you infer something
Hi,
I've come late to this thread, and missed some of the altered images
that people put up. Any chance of a repeat, please?
Having said that, surely the www if it's anything is a document
sharing system. Certainly that was what Tim Berners-Lee intended,
according to his book 'Weaving the Web'.
Many years ago, when the only way to sell was through the local classifieds, it was
difficult to use words to distinguish your piece of furniture from the 20 others for
sale. I used to state in my ads, Resembles the couch shown in Letter B of the
Fall/Winter Sears Catalog, page 411. It worked.
Bob Blakely said:
I don't think it's theft
[And then continued, probably unwittingly, to insult the female members of
the group. Snip... OUCH!! Snip... OUCH!!]
Hi Bob,
The particular fellow in question did take someone else's copyrighted,
legally published creative work, and used it
Bill Peifer wrote:
The particular fellow in question did take someone else's copyrighted,
legally published creative work, and used it without permission for
commercial purposes. That violates the fair use provisions of US copyright
law. Certainly, that constitutes theft, does it not?
' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: More image theft... (Dario Bonazza, now he's got yours)
Hi folks,
Shel's cool photo was excellent, but now this image-purloining idiot
from
eBay is stealing somebody ~else's~ shot to sell his eBay wares! He's now
linking
eBay
links or URL's, like the one we are discussing, are *not* legal.
BB And the law violated was what? Again, ebay is not authorized by any government to
make
BB laws.
How I understand international copyright law, the use of my image
without my permission IS illegal. That it may be
, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Dario Bonazza' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: More image theft... (Dario Bonazza, now he's got yours)
Hi folks,
Shel's cool photo was excellent, but now this image-purloining idiot
from
: Peifer, William [OCDUS]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Dario Bonazza' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: More image theft... (Dario Bonazza, now
he's got yours)
Hi folks,
Shel's cool photo was excellent, but now this
image-purloining idiot
In a message dated Tue, 12 Mar 2002 2:55:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, Aaron Reynolds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 01:54 PM, Bob Blakely wrote:
In other words, just because you infer something not said inside
something I have said
doesn't mean that I
PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Dario Bonazza' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: More image theft... (Dario Bonazza, now
he's got yours)
Hi folks,
Shel's cool photo was excellent, but now this
image-purloining idiot
from
eBay is stealing somebody ~else's
Subject: RE: More image theft... (Dario Bonazza, now
he's got yours)
Hi folks,
Shel's cool photo was excellent, but now this
image-purloining idiot
from
eBay is stealing somebody ~else's~ shot to sell
his eBay wares! He's now
linking to the following:
http
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob Blakely said:
I don't think it's theft
[And then continued, probably unwittingly, to insult the female members of
the group. Snip... OUCH!! Snip... OUCH!!]
Har!
I insulted no one. Men's and women's brains have structural
of the event.
- Samuel Adams, 1771
- Original Message -
From: Paris, Leonard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: More image theft...
Not to mention the fact that they might be mis-representing the condition of
the real item for sale
- Original Message -
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:28 PM
Subject: RE: More image theft...
Bob Blakely said:
I don't think it's theft
[And then continued
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:37 PM
Subject: RE: More image theft...
Bill Peifer wrote:
The particular fellow in question did take someone else's copyrighted,
legally published creative work, and used it without permission for
commercial purposes. That violates
]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: More image theft... (Dario Bonazza, now he's got yours)
Hi folks,
Just look at it now :-)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
Dario Bonazza
http://digilander.iol.it/aohc
Quick, somebody call Buckaroo Banzai ...
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: OT Re: More image theft...
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 10:23 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Evil! Pure and simple
/
- Original Message -
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Dario Bonazza' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: More image theft... (Dario Bonazza, now
he's got yours)
Hi folks,
Shel's cool photo
You're wrong. You don't have to claim ownership to violate copyright. Using
someone else's work for commercial purposes without permission or just
compensation
is enough. By the way a technically copy was caused to be made every time
someone
visited that auction, don't believe me just
Subject: Re: More image theft... (Dario Bonazza, now he's got yours)
Hi folks,
Just look at it now :-)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
Dario Bonazza
http://digilander.iol.it/aohc/
- Original Message -
From: Peifer
Nitin Garg wrote:
Dont basic web accounts allow cgi ? thats all that is needed.
CGI is a big security risk and I don't think many accounts allow it.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ (out of date)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Not to beat a dead horse, but this guy is not only stealing your image,
but he's linking directly to it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
Crazy.
steve
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Doh, that was only meant for Boz.
steve
Steve Knobbe wrote:
Not to beat a dead horse, but this guy is not only stealing your image,
but he's linking directly to it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
Crazy.
steve
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
This is by link (not copied), and the copyright notice is retained. I
believe this might actually be legal.
Regards,
Bob...
Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity,
and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us
from the former, for the sake of the latter.
The
19:51:41 -0600
From: Steve Knobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: More image theft...
Not to beat a dead horse, but this guy is not only stealing your image,
but he's linking directly to it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
Crazy.
steve
-
This message is from
Steve Knobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to beat a dead horse, but this guy is not only stealing your image,
but he's linking directly to it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
Ooh. There's an easy way to extract delicious revenge for that! evil grin
--
Mark
LMAO ... I can think of any number of delicious images from porn sites
that might brighten up an otherwise boring eBay search.
Mark Roberts wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1338873380
Ooh. There's an easy way to extract delicious revenge for that! evil grin
-
Shel
Rather than porn, I'd put in an image of a Leica M6 and see what
that would cause.
Len
---
Ooh. There's an easy way to extract delicious revenge for
that! evil grin
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
A direct comment would be to put up a jpeg of text to the effect of
something like:
The seller in this auction was too lazy or incompetent to take a picture of
the item he is selling. So he linked to one of my pictures without
permission. Would you buy a used camera from this man?
stan
3/11/02
Better yet
Stan Halpin wrote:
A direct comment would be to put up a jpeg of text to the effect of
something like:
The seller in this auction was too lazy or incompetent to take a picture of
the item he is selling. So he linked to one of my pictures without
permission. Would you buy a used
a camera
dealer could at least manage one image of his product!
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: More image theft...
A direct comment would be to put up a jpeg of text to the effect of
something
I suppose I could offer Boz a picture of my really ugly and
beaten up MX to give a new name to..
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
93 matches
Mail list logo
