I have a HP Pavilion, with a 17" quite decent monitor (actually I am not sure
it's a 15", but not quite sure how to measure it). Only I've had both for
about, hmmm, four years. I've been told/read the HP monitors are actually
Trinitron.
I've been quite happy with the monitor. Only now the horiz
My experience with LCD's right now is that the ones that really are
decent, and good enough for image processing work, are still
expensive. I am probably going to stick with my 21" CRT (Mitsubishi
DiamondScan) for a while longer.
CRT monitors are available used, in fact, I've seen decent 19-20"
tr
My partner is a system adminstrator for a major corporation in this
area. The last shipment of fairly highly touted but "consumer grade"
CRTs for his company proved to be a disaster: the monitors were so
bad that he and the engineers who use them were experiencing
headaches and seriously wo
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 2:40 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Cheap Monitor
My partner is a system adminstrator for a major corporation in this
area. The last shipment of fairly highly touted but "consumer grade"
CRTs for his company proved to be
In a message dated 11/19/2005 11:40:53 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd strongly recommend any current 15-17" flat panel display over any
comparably priced CRT today. You get more viewable area, better
stability, better color rendering, and the current generation of
in
In a message dated 11/19/2005 11:51:16 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yes there are MANY junk crts on the market, but
the high end ones outperform even the best LCDs.
and the thing is you can get NEW old stock high
end CRTS for the same or less on EBAY than any of the
LCDs cur
In a message dated 11/19/2005 10:57:49 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Something like
http://www.surpluscomputers.com/store/main.aspx?p=ItemDetail&item=MON10136
might work nicely, if you have the space for such a behemoth, and
don't mind paying shipping (or driving? Are you in
On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I KNEW someone would recommend a LCD anyway. :-)
I don't like to waste money on poor quality monitors.
Maybe my laptop is nothing to go by, but it's a pretty good laptop,
and the
display gives me a headache. I don't like the mat effect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/19/2005 11:51:16 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yes there are MANY junk crts on the market, but
the high end ones outperform even the best LCDs.
and the thing is you can get NEW old stock high
end CRTS for the same or less on E
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: OT: Cheap Monitor
My partner is a system adminstrator for a major corporation in this area.
The last shipment of fairly highly touted but "consumer grade" CRTs for
his company proved to be a disaster:
On 19 Nov 2005 at 14:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe my laptop is nothing to go by, but it's a pretty good laptop, and the
> display gives me a headache. I don't like the mat effect etc. I also invested
> in
> a Spyder fairly recently, which is unnecessary for a LCD.
Not quite true, I've ca
On Nov 19, 2005, at 1:56 PM, William Robb wrote:
... My guess is that was the problem in your friends office as well.
He changed all the settings, refresh rates included, several times
trying to find a solution. The CRTs were junk.
Godfrey
Almost 1 year ago, my LG 17" CRT 'collapsed'. Since
the LCD size that I really like (19") was too
expensive at that time, I went for a new 17" CRT. I
chose a Samsung (SyncMaster 793) with a flat screen
(not rounded) and good specs (refresh rate, dot
size,...) that went for the equivalent of about 1
13 matches
Mail list logo
