I just bought some printable cd's
Would you like me to send you some?
ann
graywolf wrote:
Yes and the R220 is already a year old. I kind of like my R200. I've
just started using it to print CD's, so the local stores quit carrying
printable CD's. That seems to be the story of my life. Too
Paul
Do you have a link
I have been all over the site and cannot find that info.
Dave
Quoting Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dave -
Epson's web site lists the dye based inks used by the R200-R300 series
as lasting 30 years on their Matte Paper Heavyweight. They say the
pigment inks
Dave -
Go to this page...
http://tinyurl.com/y9bk
There are links there to two PDF's, one leads to a Ink and Paper
Compatibility Guide and the other to Print Permanence Ratings. I got
the info from the Print Permanence Ratings.
Let me know if the tinyURL doesn't work, the original was a
Me no, but my customers know were i live.:-)
The Canon S800 and bci inks are speced out at around 25 years, i
think. Any one know what the 220 is speced at. If its similar Whoo Hoo.
I didi make some profit this year. I know i should save it, but i'm
looking at the K10D, the Epson 2400 and or
Dave -
Epson's web site lists the dye based inks used by the R200-R300 series
as lasting 30 years on their Matte Paper Heavyweight. They say the
pigment inks used in the R800/R1800 are good for 100+ years. No listing
for the newer inksets used in the R2400.
While pricier than the R220, I
Adam - do you mean r220?
Thats what I have and I love it -
although I would like to be able to make larger prints - I scarcely
print anything for myself right now due to
tight budgets... I just print if someone orders a print from me having
seen it on the web.
If I get a serious collection
Yes and the R220 is already a year old. I kind of like my R200. I've
just started using it to print CD's, so the local stores quit carrying
printable CD's. That seems to be the story of my life. Too little, too
late...
-graywolf
ann sanfedele wrote:
Adam - do you mean r220?
Thats what I
The R220 is one of them, there's 4 or 5 versions now (R200 through R280 IIRC)
with odd numbers being the 220V version of each.
-Adam
ann sanfedele wrote:
Adam - do you mean r220?
Thats what I have and I love it -
although I would like to be able to make larger prints - I scarcely
print
Actually, i bought the R220 last spring, but never set it up.
Somewere i heard, maybe here, that the prints were not archival, so i
did not want that for my sales prints.
I also heard the BW on Matte was very good, but again no longevity.
Am i off base here.
If so, i quess i should fire the
What? You planing on living forever, Dave? They will certainly last long
enough for your customers to forget who they bought the photo from grin.
-graywolf
David J Brooks wrote:
Actually, i bought the R220 last spring, but never set it up.
Somewere i heard, maybe here, that the prints were
Is still don't know if I should by a printer.
I'm not printing now (only a have a colour laser hum...) but would
like to do so.
However, price (printer as well as inks paper) is really scaring me.
I'm really on budget.
What would you do or choose ?
2006/12/3, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On
Yes, I feel the same way about mine!
I find it very clean operation and the prints do sparkle, even on matte
paper.
I also love the BW's it does as well.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'v narrowed my next printer down to the R1800 or Canon's 9000Pro model.
Both similar in papaer spec's and price, with the Epson a tad cheaper.
Dave
Quoting Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is still don't know if I should by a printer.
I'm not printing now (only a have a colour laser hum...)
I'm quite happy with the R2400. Colour prints are great, but BW is
where it really shines is why I got it. I would have loved the R4800
but there was no way I could justify the cost. If I ever need larger
than A3, I'll go to one of the local labs.
A full set of inks is relatively expensive
Forgot to ask. Is the R1800 decent for BW printing. I don't think
Canon has a great BW reviews.
Dave
Quoting David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'v narrowed my next printer down to the R1800 or Canon's 9000Pro model.
Both similar in papaer spec's and price, with the Epson a tad cheaper.
Hear! Hear! Just had it since yesterday. (Replaced a well worn 820).
Beautiful operation that just sounds solid as it quickly produces
extremely sharp prints.
I now see a need to calibrate it. Had a pro suggest Huey color
correction system.(?) Anyone have an opinion or suggestion?
Thanks.
Jack
I use a SpyderPro 2.
Best investment I ever made.
Dave
On 12/3/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hear! Hear! Just had it since yesterday. (Replaced a well worn 820).
Beautiful operation that just sounds solid as it quickly produces
extremely sharp prints.
I now see a need to calibrate
On Dec 3, 2006, at 2:29 AM, Thibouille wrote:
Is still don't know if I should by a printer.
I'm not printing now (only a have a colour laser hum...) but would
like to do so.
However, price (printer as well as inks paper) is really scaring me.
I'm really on budget.
What would you do or
If you're using Epson papers and their profiles with the R1800 and
R2400, you rarely need to profile the printer. You need to calibrate
your monitor and adopt a color managed workflow.
some folks have gotten good results with the Huey. I tend to prefer
the Eye One Display 2 ... the software
In a message dated 12/3/2006 6:35:26 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Forgot to ask. Is the R1800 decent for BW printing. I don't think
Canon has a great BW reviews.
Dave
=
Well, I did a big one on glossy paper that had a slight color cast. But then,
it is partly
Will save this..Thanks!
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're using Epson papers and their profiles with the R1800 and
R2400, you rarely need to profile the printer. You need to calibrate
your monitor and adopt a color managed workflow.
some folks have gotten
If you can live with A4 prints, get whatever Epson R200 series printer
that is the current model. It will equal the R800 and R1800 for output,
although you're giving up the print longevity (30 years instead of 90+).
And they're relatively cheap to run. I'm quite fond of the Epson Premium
No, for good BW with a stock inkset you'll need to go to the R2400.
-Adam
David J Brooks wrote:
Forgot to ask. Is the R1800 decent for BW printing. I don't think
Canon has a great BW reviews.
Dave
Quoting David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'v narrowed my next printer down to the
Thanks Adam, helps me much !
2006/12/3, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you can live with A4 prints, get whatever Epson R200 series printer
that is the current model. It will equal the R800 and R1800 for output,
although you're giving up the print longevity (30 years instead of 90+).
And
What about the Mis speciality BW inks Adam
'
Dave
Quoting Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, for good BW with a stock inkset you'll need to go to the R2400.
-Adam
David J Brooks wrote:
Forgot to ask. Is the R1800 decent for BW printing. I don't think
Canon has a great BW reviews.
Dave
Dunno if they have a set for the R1800, but you can use those in a 1280
or 2200 for excellent results.
-Adam
David J Brooks wrote:
What about the Mis speciality BW inks Adam
'
Dave
Quoting Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, for good BW with a stock inkset you'll need to go to the R2400.
Yup, been printing with it for days now (getting ready for show), and, wow,
does it make great prints! Makes my stuff look better than it is. :-) The
printer is also sturdy and well-built, so I don't feel like it is going to fall
apart on me any time soon. It does eat ink, but not worse than
On 12/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, been printing with it for days now (getting ready for show), and, wow,
does it make great prints! Makes my stuff look better than it is. :-) The
printer is also sturdy and well-built, so I don't feel like it is going to
fall
apart
28 matches
Mail list logo
