[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Doing something along those lines here. I teach beginning photography to
> adults and middle school children, two hours per class, two nights per week
> (in the evening) at the school.
Good for you!
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon Graphics, Inc.
(
In a message dated 1/18/01 8:26:49 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< W Keith Mosier wrote:
> Someone recently suggested Pentax sponsoring some of us photogs. Wouldn't
> it be fantastic if instead they could sponsor school camera clubs around
> the world? Most of the s
W Keith Mosier wrote:
> Someone recently suggested Pentax sponsoring some of us photogs. Wouldn't
> it be fantastic if instead they could sponsor school camera clubs around
> the world? Most of the school camera classes I've knowledge of suggest
> using the K1000.
That would be phenomenal.
8, 2001 4:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: Wake up (Trying to return to on topic)
>
> [snip]
>
> A difficult "either or question" John. My friend will have it
> framed then
> exhibit it on his wall along with all his other family
> photos. H
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 1/17/01 9:23:13 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> < don't care that much to go to the extra expense, time, or spend the extra
> energy, to move up aa degree or two in quality. Quality always costs, and
> most people have ot
be really hard for her to keep the
> yearbook staff from taking
> pictures -- it can only improve the quality. :-)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 11:
Actualy Shel I contributed this comment.
>
> > Most Americans seem to have lost the feel for
> quality, p&s
> > cameras fit their needs. That's why film
> processors
> > generally produce mediocre results at best, and
> often
> > produce results that are rivaled by low resolution
> > digital ca
Shel wrote:
I agree, but I wonder if your comment is too narrow a
generalization. Do you not feel the Europeans, Latinos, and
our brothers and sisters in the East have also succumbed to
the p&s mentality? We here in the states can't be the only
ones buying mediocre gear and accepting mediocre
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> And look at how many
> people on this list are buying and using mediocre quality
> lenses and getting average quality printing done at average
> quality labs. How many times have we read the word
> "acceptable" on this list to describe the results or the
> quality obta
Oh well, close enough for government work .
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Norman Baugher wrote:
>
> Actually Shel, I didn't note that :)
> Norm
>
> From: Shel Belinkoff
> > Norm noted:
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.ne
Actually Shel, I didn't note that :)
Norm
From: Shel Belinkoff
> Norm noted:
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Visit the PUG at
http://pug.komkon.org.
Norm noted:
> Most Americans seem to have lost the feel for quality, p&s
> cameras fit their needs. That's why film processors
> generally produce mediocre results at best, and often
> produce results that are rivaled by low resolution
> digital cameras. Most American consumers don't know
> bett
12 matches
Mail list logo
