gt;
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Odd request
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Great magazine and a great organization; I am a member and subscriber.
James Randi offers $100,000 to anyone who can sc
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 08:02:32 +0100 (BST)
Chris Stoddart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I read some time ago that there were made emperical tests with
> > groups that were compared. One group of patients got the prayers
> > of a group of people, the other not. All that for a certain time.
> > An
Great magazine and a great organization; I am a member and subscriber.
James Randi offers $100,000 to anyone who can scientifically prove faith
healing or other paranormal phenomina. No one has claimed the prize.
Chris Stoddart wrote:
You might like to subscribe to the Skeptical Enquirer for a
> I read some time ago that there were made emperical tests with groups
> that were compared. One group of patients got the prayers of a group of
> people, the other not. All that for a certain time. And the result was
> that the recovery was better in the first group.
Well as someone who did po
Yes, it explains quite a bit, actually.
U+B Scheffler wrote:
I hope I could explain my point of view a little bit.
explain it and accepts it very
slowly.
I hope I could explain my point of view a little bit.
Regards
Bernd
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Heide Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10
om: "Thomas Heide Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: Odd request
> Not questioning your seriousity here, Bernd, but...when you write
> "scientifically proved", the
omas Heide Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: Odd request
> Not questioning your seriousity here, Bernd, but...when you write
> "scientifically proved", then what *
Not questioning your seriousity here, Bernd, but...when you write
"scientifically proved", then what *exactly* do you mean?
Inquiring scientist wanting to know.
--thomas
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:39:14 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (U+B Scheffler) wrote:
> It is scientifically proved that the prayer of
ROFLOL!!!
César
Panama City, Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:43 PM
--
-- > -Original Message-
-- > From: Bill Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- >
-- >
-- > Late next month I'll be receiving radioactive seed
--
;
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Odd request
> Thanks, Paul.
>
> In all seriousness, I had/have no symptoms at all. Last spring, when I
went
> for a routine diabetic checkup, I asked the doc to include a PSA in the
> blood work. A result that should show
Though this was not included in your request, no matter how odd, I
wish you fast and complete recovery.
Boris
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
There are some folks here that I would love to run some medical
experiments on with that lens.
You may remember that the SMC 50/1,4 Takumar is somewhat radioactive too.
Aha. So now we know where Dr. Mengele's little brother is. Hello Karl !
cheers,
caveman
All that matters is that you recover quickly. I don't care if you fog
your film. Just get better.
Paul
>
> Bill Owens wrote:
>
> > Late next month I'll be receiving radioactive seed implants to treat
> > prostate cancer. Any suggestions on how to see if this small amount of
> > radiation will
I would guess from the thrust of past communciations that the feeling is
mutual -- to say the least.
Otis Wright
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
There are some folks here that I would love to run some medical
experiments on with that lens.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may remember that
Bill,
The radiation emmited from the seeds will not likely be effected by
a lens. Lenes are designed to shape the path of light, not other forms
of radiation.
Maybe just sit in the darkroom with a sheet or two of photographic
paper around your belly and back for 20 min . . .
Somehow
There are some folks here that I would love to run some medical
experiments on with that lens.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may remember that the SMC 50/1,4 Takumar is somewhat radioactive too.
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:10 PM
Subject: Odd request
> Late next month I'll be receiving radioactive seed implants to treat
> pro
But, seriously, Bill,
I didn't know about your illness. Let me send my best kharma your way
(OM OMM) (that's supposed to be, like, Tibetan Buddhist
chanting or something) for a speedy recovery. Here's hoping the treatments
work their magic (glow or not).
cheers,
frank
Bill
Hey, Bill,
WHATEVER YOU DO, DON'T DO IT WITH A PENTAX!
I don't ever want to see the results in PUG.
cheers,
frank
Bill Owens wrote:
> If I use color film, will it glow green?
>
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert
Oppen
On 29 Jul 2003 at 20:10, Bill Owens wrote:
> Late next month I'll be receiving radioactive seed implants to treat
> prostate cancer. Any suggestions on how to see if this small amount of
> radiation will fog film? I'm thinking sitting in a dark room, pressing a
> lens against the affected area
If I use color film, will it glow green?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:42 PM
Subject: RE: Odd request
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bill Owens [mailto:[EMAI
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Late next month I'll be receiving radioactive seed implants to treat
> prostate cancer. Any suggestions on how to see if this
> small amount of
> radiation will fog film? I'm thinking sitting in a dark
> room, pressin
Late next month I'll be receiving radioactive seed implants to treat
prostate cancer. Any suggestions on how to see if this small amount of
radiation will fog film? I'm thinking sitting in a dark room, pressing a
lens against the affected area and exposing a few frames. Do you folks
think the m
24 matches
Mail list logo
