It's always nice when one finds he didn't spend way too much for his!
Initially I was appalled, but since then I've gathered support for the
price I DID pay... g
Very nice lens!
keith
Jim Colwell wrote:
SMCP 85/1.8
[E to E++] $390 2003-12 eBay
[E to E++] $300 2004-01 bh
[M- to N] $570
Sorry that should have been Peter not Cotty.
Oops..ditto..should have been Peter.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry that should have been Peter not Cotty.
--
_
Dr. Shaun Canning
P.O. Box 21,
Dampier, WA,
6714, Australia.
m: 0414 967644
http://www.heritageservices.com.au
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
On 4/7/04, Shaun Canning, discombobulated, offered:
Oops..ditto..should have been Peter.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry that should have been Peter not Cotty.
Me, I'm not confused. Just insane.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:50:29 -0800
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: zooms
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I didn't write that!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004,
Oops, Meant to reply about Joe Wilensky's post. He's the one selling the
PZ-1p kit. Same thing. Joe, don't do it!
Jeff Jonsson
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Jonsson
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: For sale Friday
I wouldn't sell my PZ-1p
camera would likely be a hybrid of both
of them.
Joe
Oops, Meant to reply about Joe Wilensky's post. He's the one selling the
PZ-1p kit. Same thing. Joe, don't do it!
Jeff Jonsson
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Jonsson
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
Actually Vic, I was referring to the FA 300/4.5.
I had meant that a a side msg to Ken, not to the list. It would have made
more sense if I had copied the original msg, and it would have made even
more sense if I had sent it just to Ken as I intended. I hit the wrong
button. But thanks for your
256k SD card at Best Buy today for $59.99 after rebates.
Anybody put a 512k sd card into an Optio S4? I know somebody did a 256K.
What are the limits on how big a card it can address?
Regards, Bob S.
1. watch out for trees that seem to be growing from Aunt Tillie's head.
2. move the garbage can out of the background
3. don't point your $12.95 camera into the sun.
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/photogear/tillie.html
:-)
Cotty
Oh, swipe me! He paints
]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:20 PM
Subject: OT: I don't follow rules! Oops - correct URL sorry
1. watch out for trees that seem to be growing from Aunt Tillie's head.
2. move the garbage can out of the background
3. don't point your $12.95 camera into the sun.
http
There's some wee ghosties in there, lad... but the lady is just fine
:^) Your Aunt, you say?
keith
Cotty wrote:
1. watch out for trees that seem to be growing from Aunt Tillie's head.
2. move the garbage can out of the background
3. don't point your $12.95 camera into the sun.
There's some wee ghosties in there, lad... but the lady is just fine
:^) Your Aunt, you say?
keith
Well, somebody's aunt prolly. Stock shot off a CD. Background's mine.
Stock bin. My tree. She's not bad, is she. Is this a sign of me getting
older, by fancying the...more mature woman? Feroze:
baby oil cotty baby oil, at least thats what I heard.
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: OT: I don't follow rules! Oops - correct URL sorry
There's some wee ghosties
Yes, I spent more money :(
Today's purchase is a nice little secondhand F*300mm f/4.5 lens. Its
previous owner is doing a photography course, and since everyone else was
using Nikon he sold his Pentax kit. And who am I to complain? Some
other lenses he was selling were quite tempting but I
- Original Message -
From: David A. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:38 AM
Subject: Oops - I did it again
Yes, I spent more money :(
Today's purchase is a nice little secondhand F*300mm f/4.5 lens. Its
previous owner is doing
Dave:
Some interspersed comments:
Today's purchase is a nice little secondhand F*300mm f/4.5 lens.
Congratulations. You picked up a really fine lens.
The previous owner had modified the tripod shoe a bit as he
thought it stuck out too far, so he had it shortened both in
height and
Even though my course is developing/darkroom, i know
for sure we have 1 Canon Rebel,1 Minolta ?? and 2 K1000's
(one from me:))So far the K1000's are producing nicer enlargements
IMNSHOg
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was surrounded with Nikons and
In a message dated 11/14/02 8:39:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I plan on keeping both the A* 300/4 and the F* 300/4.5. The
F* is ultimately a sharper lens (as much as I hate to admit it -
g), with a very effective hood, with pretty good manual focus
feel, and with a solid if bulky
Fred wrote:
Congratulations. You picked up a really fine lens.
Thanks. From the other comments I've seen, I'm sure I've made a good
purchase. I think I wouldn't have bought it if it wasn't for the
following reasons:
1) I already have the A*300mm f/4 but the 4m minimum focus distance is a
Which reminds me: Does Pentax still sell screen tweezers?
Will any tweezer sold work with any screens? I just picked
up a couple MXen (one with split/microprism, one with plain,
and an extra grid screen) and would like to get a tool that
lets me change these EASILY. Right now I'm using a dental
The grid screen for my PZ-1 came with a tweezer. Isn't that included with all
screens?
Frits
On Sunday 10 November 2002 21:26, Lon Williamson wrote:
Which reminds me: Does Pentax still sell screen tweezers?
Will any tweezer sold work with any screens? I just picked
up a couple MXen (one
Try telling yourself the screen is now brassed and
therefore has been to hell and back on a brassed LX.
Shaun Canning wrote:
Alas, all too late Vic, but luckily the scratch is only minor. It will not
affect anything other than my pride
Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which reminds me: Does Pentax still sell screen tweezers?
Will any tweezer sold work with any screens? I just picked
up a couple MXen (one with split/microprism, one with plain,
and an extra grid screen) and would like to get a tool that
lets me change
Mark Roberts wrote:
I think all the focusing screens come with tweezers (or they're supposed to)
but I usually use surgical forceps (I think you can still buy these at Radio Shack!)
In the old days we called them roach clips.
Paul
Hi,
On 5 Nov 2002 at 14:15, Shaun Canning wrote:
You know what I really hate when those stupid little tweezers for
changing LX screens slip and scratch the crap out of an otherwise
bewdiful LX screen. Damn I hate that...
I know.
The easiest way to make an LX unique... ;-)
Gabor
(pride
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Oops
Hi,
On 5 Nov 2002 at 14:15, Shaun Canning wrote:
You know what I really hate when those stupid little tweezers for
changing LX screens slip and scratch the crap out of an otherwise
bewdiful LX screen. Damn I hate that...
I know.
The easiest way to make an LX unique
It's always dicey using metal tools around plastic parts. I remember being
very careful changing screens on my MX. However, last month I was looking
through the viewfinder on my MZ-S and noticed some dust. I removed the lens
and was able to release the screen frame with a fingernail.
Then I
In a message dated 11/4/02 10:16:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You know what I really hate when those stupid little tweezers for
changing LX screens slip and scratch the crap out of an otherwise bewdiful
LX screen. Damn I hate that...
Shaun Canning
I'm with you Shaun. Be damn
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Pentxuser;aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 November 2002 03:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Oops
In a message dated 11/4/02 10:16:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You know what I really hate when those stupid little tweezers for
changing LX screens slip and scratch
You know what I really hate when those stupid little tweezers for
changing LX screens slip and scratch the crap out of an otherwise bewdiful
LX screen. Damn I hate that...
SO glad to hear I'm not the only one to do that!
It happened a few weeks ago to a screen I had Just Bought. Man I
]
Phone: 0414-967 644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ernreed2;texas.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 November 2002 09:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Oops
You know what I really hate when those stupid little tweezers for
changing LX screens slip and scratch the crap out
Shaun posted
They seem to pop up on Ebay pretty regularly. I got my last one from a guy
in Hong Kong for about 25.00 USD. I think Rob Studdert had some for sale not
long ago too
In reply to
So I am waiting for my new screen. And if I scratch that one, I think even
you
guys in Oz will
Darn, I am really mucking things up. I guess 3 pots of coffee and it being
4:30am may account for some of that ;-)
Bruce, that is the coolest thing. I've filed that into my memory banks now.
Geez, after all the literature I read on photography, I never ran across
that. Thanks!
Brad Dobo
-
Well, first, I'm not an American, and I don't know about the US being a
throw-away society, but, while not owning older cameras that need repair, I
feel for those that do. It makes me wonder what kind or level of commitment
they have with North America. (Still waiting on that cable release :~( )
Not a problem.I just got the impresion they were expecting
them at Mississauga next week.May be mistaken though.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:52:31 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: oops, stupid OE, read this one :) Re
I hope you are right Dave. Maybe it'll arrive when the Pentax DSLR comes
out? ;-)
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: Re: oops, stupid OE, read this one :) Re: Fw: Trading LX's
Oops. This _is_ a Pentax photo mailing list, not a motorcycle list...
:-)
--Mark
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
--- Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops. This _is_ a Pentax photo mailing list, not a
motorcycle list...
:-)
--Mark
But you can take pictures of motorcycles with a
Pentax, so it's okay. :)
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
I'm sure you can. If you can get them at 26. H, I
think that sounds a little better than having a
blonde day. Maybe I can be an honorary senior
instead.
Anonymous senior.
--- Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As for the other expenses, it's a month away.
We'll know everything then.
Mike Johnston wrote:
As for the other expenses, it's a month away. We'll know everything then.
I must have money on the brain. I mistyped expenses when I meant
changes.
Can you have a senior moment at 44? Well, whatever
Let me see...? What was the question? Oh yeah, can you have a
Let me see...? What was the question? Oh yeah, can you have a senior
moment at 44? I think that's about when they start.
Paul
-
Hmm, 44? That was too long ago for me to remember back that far. Could
have been, though. :)
Len
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
As for the other expenses, it's a month away. We'll know everything then.
I must have money on the brain. I mistyped expenses when I meant
changes.
Can you have a senior moment at 44? Well, whatever
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Scanned a film last night - noticed a hair on one frame so removed from
scanner, dusted with blower brush and hit scan... four times... before
realising the black image would go away if I put the film back in the
scanner.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Sorry about the excessive quoting in my previouspost--slipped by me somehow.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very nice, Mark!
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not that you can tell much from web images but a lot of my best recent photos
have been done with this lens. See
This was meant just to go to Chris B with whom I had
discussed the lens mentioned below.
sorry guys,
ann
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Turns out that lens I have has may have some separation...
or so Herb Zimmerman told me, who was once at PRo Camera
repair. I may never get rid of the thing.
In a message dated 7/21/01 8:04:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subj: RE: Semi-OT: Pickpockets oops.
Date: 7/21/01 8:04:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Amita Guha)
Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: A HREF=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
and make a proper assessment of what is or isn't safe to carry.
Make sure you're fully insured, and don't let paranoia ruin your trip.
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saturday, July 21, 2001, 12:51:35 AM, you wrote:
Oops, sorry about that. Think I pressed Enter
instead of Shift and somehow
- Original Message -
From: petit miam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Semi-OT: Pickpockets oops.
| I was wondering what you guys do to protect expensive
| Pentax (and cringe...other brands) camera gear while
| travelling. I mean, here in New Zealand, you could
| wander around with 10
Good question! I live in NYC and I've walked around with my camera
around my neck with no problem. Heck, the tourists do it. :) I even
took my tripod out to a park and hiked with it for two hours, and
no one disturbed me. Granted, so far I've only done it in areas where
there were a lot of
Actually that reminds me of my trip to Western
Australia about 5 years ago. I was tramping (hiking)
on this fairly deserted walking track on the outskirts
of Bunbury with my Spotmatic over my shoulder, and
this guy in a car asked if I would like to go with him
and take some photos. I can guess
Oops, sorry about that. Think I pressed Enter
instead of Shift and somehow the message decided to
be sent.
I was wondering what you guys do to protect expensive
Pentax (and cringe...other brands) camera gear while
travelling. I mean, here in New Zealand, you could
wander around with 10
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, petit miam wrote:
Do people try and cut the straps of your camera-bag? I have heard of
this happening with hand-bags. And what if you just put it in a normal
bag? How do you get it out to take a photo without attracting
attention? Or do you just not take photos?
I live
, smelly used nappies
Of course the interior can be customised with partitions from your
regular camera bag.
Ciao
Mark
are usually
- Original Message -
From: petit miam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 1:51 AM
Subject: Semi-OT: Pickpockets oops.
Oops
another private email sent off to list!!!
I must pay more attention to those email adresses before pressing
'reply' !
lucky this one wasnt *too* confidential, right guys? :-)
Daphne
well since the deed is done... anyone interested *after* Tanya gets her
pick, get back to me offlist.
-
This
petit miam wrote:
But how does it work? Why don't your reds come out
green in the photo?
I'm not sure how much of the colour shift is simply due to the
lack of orange base and how much is because of Funky Chemistry,
but I was under the impression that the nature of the shifts
varies from
a lot of fun
to experiment with.
Paul
--Original Message--
From: petit miam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Digest Pentax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 29, 2001 12:24:42 PM GMT
Subject: Cross-dressing (oops processing)
I am going to ask a silly question. Could someone
please explain cross
E6 processed in C41 doesn't get reversed, so it's a negative image .
-- http://USFamily.Net/info - Unlimited Internet - From $8.99/mo! --
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
Oops, wrong link in my previous message:
In :
Tests of classic 50mm's in
http://www.pictchallenge.com/diabolpif/Cadrag.html and following
(with M50 f1.7, which had the bad luck of having the sun behind a cloud
when
it was it's turn)
that should be :
http://www.pictchallenge.com/diabolpif
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Piv: 31. tammikuuta 2001 1:00
Aihe: Re: Vs: Angenieux 70-210/2.5 [oops]
In a message dated 1/30/2001 12:10:08 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Popular Photography December 1985
In a message dated 1/30/2001 4:27:57 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Maybe 70-210/3.5 ? One heck of a lens, proof that 30 years ago
exceptional zooms were possible.
See:
http://www.photodo.com/prod/lens/detail/An70-210_35-2.shtml
Alin:
Oops - what I ~meant~ was f/3.5 - g
://www.oldtimercameras.com/index3.html
They have 39 reports on Angeniux lenses, but none on the lens you
mentioned; the closest match is a 70-210/3.5 from the (late?) '80s.
Oops - I ~meant~ f/3.5 - g. (Blame it on late-night typing - sorry.)
Thanks for the link - "the closest match is a 70-210/3.5 from the
In a message dated 1/30/2001 12:10:08 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Popular Photography December 1985. Is the lens for sale?
Oops - I ~meant~ to type 70-210/3.5 (f/3.5, and not f/2.5) - g. (Doh...)
Thanks, Raimo, for the tip. I assume, though, that you correctly
How dumb I am! I just mixed in a roll of Acupan T800 with Fomapan 400
pushed 2 stops (16 min in Microphen) ... The Acupan 800 was exposed as 2
stop push also, but needs quite less developing in MPH to get there -
around 14-15 minutes AT MAX. Results: the 800+2 is quite overdeveloped.
Pushing
201 - 264 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
