Thanks, Bruce.
I will take a look at the color again. this was taken outdoors, in an area
surrounded by 2 story retail structures, about sunset. There were some
colored lights of various hues in the vicinity.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at
I like it, Dan. :)
I do feel it has a too strong orange cast.
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Groan!
Thanks, Rick.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> Clever! It works, too!
>
> The mane thing is, she didn’t give you a brush-off.
>
> Rick
>
> > On Jan 21, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Daniel J. Matyola
> wrote:
> >
> >
Clever! It works, too!
The mane thing is, she didn’t give you a brush-off.
Rick
> On Jan 21, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> AA few days ago, we stopped by to watch a small Polynesian dance
> performance in Wailea. I tried to get a few images, but the woman in front
> of my man
Thanks, John and Ann.
Hula shows can be very Disneyesque, depending who is doing it and why.
Traditional Hawaiian hula is quite different from what one sees at Tourist
Luaus. Those feature a lot of Tahitian, Maori and Tongan dancing, because
those are more dramatic and energetic than serious Haw
On 1/21/2018 7:52 PM, John wrote:
On 1/21/2018 13:59, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
AA few days ago, we stopped by to watch a small Polynesian dance
performance in Wailea. I tried to get a few images, but the woman in
front
of my managed to get some of her blonde hair in almost every shot. What
On 1/21/2018 13:59, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
AA few days ago, we stopped by to watch a small Polynesian dance
performance in Wailea. I tried to get a few images, but the woman in front
of my managed to get some of her blonde hair in almost every shot. What
the hell, I thought, why not just get
AA few days ago, we stopped by to watch a small Polynesian dance
performance in Wailea. I tried to get a few images, but the woman in front
of my managed to get some of her blonde hair in almost every shot. What
the hell, I thought, why not just get a shot of the hair?
http://dan-matyola.squares
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Sandra Hermann wrote:
> This was a spur of the moment shot with my new P&S. I should have gone inside
> and gotten the "real" camera and my longish lens, but I didn't know how much
> time I would have.
> It is a lovely day to be outside right now. It was suppos
On Dec 19, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Sandra Hermann wrote:
> http://samsphotopage.blogspot.com/2009/12/blonde-and-crew.html
This shot instantly reminded me of Happy Hens...
http://www.happyhens.co.nz/
Despite the terrible website they're a very nice product. We have a trio of
them watching over our k
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Nice catch! Like the rooster's apparent stalking of the girls.
Or Cotty running away from same,
Just kidding man.;-)
Dave
>
> Jack
>
> --- On Fri, 12/18/09, Sandra Hermann wrote:
>
>> From: Sandra Hermann
>
Nice catch! Like the rooster's apparent stalking of the girls.
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/18/09, Sandra Hermann wrote:
> From: Sandra Hermann
> Subject: PESO: Blonde and Crew
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Date: Friday, December 18, 2009, 12:56 PM
> This was a spur of the moment shot
This was a spur of the moment shot with my new P&S. I should have gone inside
and gotten the "real" camera and my longish lens, but I didn't know how much
time I would have.
It is a lovely day to be outside right now. It was supposed to start snowing
a few hours ago, but it is still warm out.
f" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 2:57 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Blonde
Thanks, David ...
I remember that pic from a couple of weeks ago ... :-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
Here you go Shel (and anyone else),
http://www.daytonphoto.c
That's the version I like. My comments about excessive contrast and
burned highlights were in reference to someone's remake of this image.
Love this one.
Paul
On Sep 25, 2005, at 1:35 AM, David Savage wrote:
Here you go Shel (and anyone else),
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0110_amber_042.htm
Thanks, David ...
I remember that pic from a couple of weeks ago ... :-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: David Savage
> Here you go Shel (and anyone else),
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0110_amber_042.htm
>
> Originally posted by Bruce Dayton on the 8th Sept.
Here you go Shel (and anyone else),
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0110_amber_042.htm
Originally posted by Bruce Dayton on the 8th Sept.
Dave
On 9/25/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would people PLEASE quote the URL in their responses. A number of messages
> don't make the list
This is out of context. I was commenting on a modification to a picture
that had been posted. The original had flesh toned highlights. The redo
I commented on was inferior. I have no problem with specular
highlights. If you've seen my backlit wakeboarding pics, you would
realize that :-).
On S
Would people PLEASE quote the URL in their responses. A number of messages
don't make the list or the archives. Quoting the URL allows those of use
receiving only replies an opportunity to see the pix as well.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Glen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> At 06:43 AM 9/8/2005
At 06:43 AM 9/8/2005, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This example is far too bright on my screen, and the contrast has rendered
her complexion almost ruddy. The highlights on her forehead and in her
hair are near white.. My display is a calibrated Apple flat panel with the
brightness set rather low to
Bruce, Lovely portrait, though I have to say I prefer the original, the
coloring is much more subtle.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Shel,
Based on your recommendation, I went back and punched it up just a
bit. I think it does look just a bit better, although it has a slight
effect on the skin to
Super shot Bruce. Pose and lighting are very good.
You certainly have the eye for positioning subjects.
Dave(likes first shot better)Brooks
> This is my daughter. It was taken as the
light
was waning in the
> evening. I had to use a fairly slow shutter spee
Bruce,
Lighting, ideal. Soft, detailed and clean.
I think the depth concentrates the focus precisely as
it should.
Beautiful subject.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Shel,
>
> Based on your recommendation, I went back and
> punched it up just a
> bit. I think it does
On 9/8/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is my daughter. It was taken as the light was waning in the
> evening. I had to use a fairly slow shutter speed and large aperture to
> get a reasonable exposure. She had just gotten her hair highlighted and
> wanted a few shots of it.
>
This example is far too bright on my screen, and the contrast has
rendered her complexion almost ruddy. The highlights on her forehead
and in her hair are near white.. My display is a calibrated Apple flat
panel with the brightness set rather low to match my printer output.
Paul
On Sep 8, 2005,
I prefer the original. On my monitor, the bright area on her forehead
is beginning to show a hint of posterization on the higher contrast
version.
On Sep 8, 2005, at 2:45 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Shel,
Based on your recommendation, I went back and punched it up just a
bit. I think it do
Beautiful girl, beautiful shot. Love the light. Very nice.
Paul
On Sep 8, 2005, at 1:39 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
This is my daughter. It was taken as the light was waning in the
evening. I had to use a fairly slow shutter speed and large aperture
to
get a reasonable exposure. She had just got
On 8/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I think we're at the point of splitting hairs, really
That's *not* what Bruce's daughter wanted to hear !
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Better, IMO - here's what looks pretty good on my screen:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/adj.jpg
I think we're at the point of splitting hairs, really, as I don't think
either of our results is clearly "better," just somewhat different
interpretations, and with the differences in monitors, w
Hello Shel,
Based on your recommendation, I went back and punched it up just a
bit. I think it does look just a bit better, although it has a slight
effect on the skin tones. I'm suspecting my monitor is just a shade
more contrasty than yours.
Anyway, here's the changed image:
http://www.dayton
Hi Bruce ... pretty well done. Love the catchlights in Amber's eyes. Pose
is pretty nice - relaxed, informal ...my first reaction is that it was just
about a perfect setup, but when I looked on my monitor in PS it seemed that
a little tweak with levels, color, or contrast could help out a bit, gi
In a message dated 9/7/2005 10:40:14 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is my daughter. It was taken as the light was waning in the
evening. I had to use a fairly slow shutter speed and large aperture to
get a reasonable exposure. She had just gotten her hair highlighted a
This is my daughter. It was taken as the light was waning in the
evening. I had to use a fairly slow shutter speed and large aperture to
get a reasonable exposure. She had just gotten her hair highlighted and
wanted a few shots of it.
Pentax *istD, FA 50/1.4, handheld
ISO 400, 1/30 sec @ f/2.4,
33 matches
Mail list logo