Yeah, but where's the fun in that?
On 1/19/2018 20:21, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
John,
Daddy Google helped confirming that it's a myth.
See, e.g. here a very nice discussion:
http://spiders.ucr.edu/daddylonglegs.html
Cheers,
Igor
John Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:01:57 -0800 wrote:
I read somewhere
John,
Daddy Google helped confirming that it's a myth.
See, e.g. here a very nice discussion:
http://spiders.ucr.edu/daddylonglegs.html
Cheers,
Igor
John Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:01:57 -0800 wrote:
I read somewhere that they have the most potent venom of any spiders in
the world, but pose no
I read somewhere that they have the most potent venom of any spiders in
the world, but pose no danger to humans because their mouth parts are so
small they can't bite large mammals.
On 1/18/2018 11:57, ann sanfedele wrote:
Always called them "Daddy Long Legs" and didn't know, as a child, that
Tarantula is one of the fascinating creatures that I don't like much to be
close to. I haven't seen them in the wild, while we do get a few scorpions
here occasionally. (About half an year ago I found a tiny one dead on the
floor in the utility room. And long time before, I saw one or two in
Anne's right. Dave's photo is of the cellar spider https://en.m.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Pholcus_phalangioides
It is a true spider but does look a bit like some of the harvestmen with
long legs.
This illustrates the problems of common names like daddy-long-legs - the
same name can be applied to a bun
On Jan 19, 2018, at 5:57 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> Always called them "Daddy Long Legs" and didn't know, as a child, that they
> were spiders.. but they are harmless
> to humans and I always found them cute...
> I like the photo a lot, it looks like some sort of minimalist painting.. and
> the
I thought that, then looked on web and saw article saying they were..
and believed it because I
always think, these days,that it is my brain that is going...
went back again and found more evidence to to split them out --
the other name I had forgotten was "harvestmen" and refering to them I
fo
They are not spiders; they’re arachnids, but they’re actually more closely
related to scorpions than they are to spiders.
http://mentalfloss.com/article/59455/15-fascinating-facts-about-daddy-longlegs
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:08 AM,
Always called them "Daddy Long Legs" and didn't know, as a child, that
they were spiders.. but they are harmless
to humans and I always found them cute...
I like the photo a lot, it looks like some sort of minimalist painting..
and they dont look at all creepy.
I'm not bothered by spiders in t
Am 18.01.18 um 16:08 schrieb Igor PDML-StR:
Wow, I've never seen anything like that!
So many spiders, and especially little ones!
Personally, I don't like this type of spiders. In my childhood we didn't
even considered them as spiders.
(In the US they are called "Daddy longlegs", and I saw a r
David,
Wow, I've never seen anything like that!
So many spiders, and especially little ones!
Personally, I don't like this type of spiders. In my childhood we didn't
even considered them as spiders.
(In the US they are called "Daddy longlegs", and I saw a reference but
have never heard from a
Arachnophobes, avert your eyes :)
We found a spider with her little hatchlings on our kitchen ceiling today.
This is the first time I've used my DSLR since last April, and I don't know how
long it'd been since I last used a tripod.
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1054/#peso
Cheers,
Dave
--
entax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Spider Monkey Grooming (for some it might be NSFW)
This adorable Spider Monkey is just making sure all is clean. Not sure
but it might not be work safe.
Mexican Spider Monkey grooming himself
http://www.photocapturesbyjeffery.com/primates/e90e8aadf
--
Itchy?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 8:30 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Spider Monkey Grooming (for some it might be NSFW)
This adorable Spider Monkey is just making sure all is clean. Not sure
but it might
effery.com"
Subject: PESO: Spider Monkey Grooming (for some it might be NSFW)
This adorable Spider Monkey is just making sure all is clean. Not sure
but it might not be work safe.
Mexican Spider Monkey grooming himself
http://www.photocapturesbyjeffery.com/primates/e90e8aadf
--
Jeffery Johnson | Ph
Most people I know don't call that grooming! :-)
Paul via phone
> On Jul 22, 2017, at 8:34 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> TMI
>
>
> -Original Message-
>> From: "PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com"
>>
>> Subject: PESO: Spider Monkey Groomi
TMI
-Original Message-
>From: "PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com"
>Subject: PESO: Spider Monkey Grooming (for some it might be NSFW)
>
>This adorable Spider Monkey is just making sure all is clean. Not sure
>but it might not be work safe.
>
>Mexican Spider
This adorable Spider Monkey is just making sure all is clean. Not sure
but it might not be work safe.
Mexican Spider Monkey grooming himself
http://www.photocapturesbyjeffery.com/primates/e90e8aadf
--
Jeffery Johnson | Photo Captures by Jeffery
http://www.PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com
/Diverse ra
The colour version works better for me.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Brian Walters
Sent: Monday, 14 October 2013 7:34 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Spider Rock in black & white
G'd
lters
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:34 PM
Subject: PESO - Spider Rock in black & white
G'day all
I posted a colour version of this a couple of months ago. I wasn't
really happy with the colours in the harsh middle-of-the-day light, so
I thou
On 13 Oct 2013, at 22:34, Brian Walters wrote:
>
> G'day all
>
> I posted a colour version of this a couple of months ago. I wasn't really
> happy with the colours in the harsh middle-of-the-day light, so I thought I'd
> try it in B & W.
>
> What do you think?
>
> http://dl.dropboxuserconte
Colour works better to my eye. Better perception of depth. Seems more "3D" to
my eye.
Beautiful!
Cheers,
frank
Brian Walters wrote:
>G'day all
>
>I posted a colour version of this a couple of months ago. I wasn't
>really happy with the colours in the harsh middle-of-the-day light, so
>
>I
Quoting Ann Sanfedele :
nah -
you were screwed by the time of day you were there... but I don't
think the bw does anything. Prefer the color
Thanks Ann. Travelling is full of photographic compromises. At least
I was in Monument Valley in good light...
Cheers
Brian
Quoting Christine Aguila :
Hi Brian: I actually like the color version better. I think the
spider rock get lost in the bw version. Love the angle here.
Hi Christine - thanks for the comment. I think it's time I moved on
from this image.
Cheers
Brian
nah -
you were screwed by the time of day you were there... but I don't think
the bw does anything. Prefer the color
ann
On 10/13/2013 17:34, Brian Walters wrote:
G'day all
I posted a colour version of this a couple of months ago. I wasn't
really happy with the colours in the harsh middle-
Hi Brian: I actually like the color version better. I think the spider rock
get lost in the bw version. Love the angle here. Cheers, Christine
> On Oct 13, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
>
> G'day all
>
> I posted a colour version of this a couple of months ago. I wasn't really
G'day all
I posted a colour version of this a couple of months ago. I wasn't
really happy with the colours in the harsh middle-of-the-day light, so
I thought I'd try it in B & W.
What do you think?
http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP1754-K5-1a-bw-peso.html
Here's
aller
- Original Message -
From: "Aahz Maruch"
Subject: Re: PESO - Spider Rock
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Brian Walters wrote:
In Canyon de Chelly, Arizona.
We were there in the middle of the day so it's a bit harsh - you
take the light you're given...
https://dl.dropboxuserc
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Brian Walters wrote:
>
> In Canyon de Chelly, Arizona.
>
> We were there in the middle of the day so it's a bit harsh - you
> take the light you're given...
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP1754-K5-1peso.html
The light is no harsher than the l
Quoting David Mann :
On Jul 10, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP1754-K5-1peso.html
That rock must be very popular with the climbers. Looks like a very
impressive place, the scale seems vast.
As others have mentioned,
Impressive structures! The light serves to bring them into relief so
works for you here, imo.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> In Canyon de Chelly, Arizona.
>
> We were there in the middle of the day so it's a bit harsh - you take the
> light you're given...
>
> https://dl.
yayay we are both back! I wrote something similar to you about Spider
Rock. which you will eventually see :-)
still crossing fingers the problem is solved
ann
On 7/10/2013 09:45, John wrote:
On 7/10/2013 5:35 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Jul 10, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Brian Walters
wrote:
https:
On 7/10/2013 5:35 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Jul 10, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Brian Walters
wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP1754-K5-1peso.html
That rock must be very popular with the climbers. Looks like a very
impressive place, the scale seems vast.
Cheers, Da
Yes you got to us, Ann.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> I doubt very much that any climbing of Spider rock is allowed. It is an
> important part of Navajo folklore and history and though a National
> Monument
I doubt very much that any climbing of Spider rock is allowed. It is an
important part of Navajo folklore and history and though a National
Monument, it is on Navajo Nation land.
Despite your battle with the light , Brian, I really like this shot..
I've photographed it from about the same spot
On Jul 10, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP1754-K5-1peso.html
That rock must be very popular with the climbers. Looks like a very impressive
place, the scale seems vast.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@
I really like that. The way you have made the double pillar stand out
from the background give a 3D effect to the image, and the stream
running through the central portion is just perfectly positioned!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:12 PM,
Stunning. Makes one feel quite small.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Brian Walters
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:12 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Spider Rock
In Canyon de Chelly, Arizona.
We were there in the middle of the day so it's a bit harsh - you tak
Breathtaking scenery beautifully captured. You tamed that light imho.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Brian Walters
Sent: July 9, 2013 7/9/13
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: PESO - Spider Rock
In Canyon de Chelly, Arizona.
We were there in the middle of the d
In Canyon de Chelly, Arizona.
We were there in the middle of the day so it's a bit harsh - you take
the light you're given...
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP1754-K5-1peso.html
Comments and suggestions most welcome.
--
Cheers
Brian
Nice shots. I like 20120907-LRC70874.jpg the best of the set.
Mark
On 9/7/2012 11:45 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I think that this is the best, compositionally, from the set that made me
realize I need a real ring flash:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/7953143868/
fourteen frames in the set:
That's very good, Larry. You got excellent definition there.
I'd hazard a guess that in this case the ring flash wouldn't have done
any better, and possibly worse. The ring flash close up gives very
non-directional light, and that would have caused the web to almost
disappear by reducing the contr
I think that this is the best, compositionally, from the set that made me
realize I need a real ring flash:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/7953143868/
fourteen frames in the set:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157631459539756/
Tamron 90/2.8 macro lens with various config
Thanks to all who looked and gave me your thoughts on the Spider,,,Joe
I shot this spider the night before the Morning Glory photos. In the
folder the the first 12 photos are of the same spider with different
flash settings and using two flashes..Thanks for looking..Joe
http://photo.net/p
rom: jn289
Sent: August 22, 2012 8/22/12
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - SPIDER
I shot this spider the night before the Morning Glory photos. In the
folder the the first 12 photos are of the same spider with different
flash settings and using two flashes..Thanks for looking..Joe
http://photo.n
_
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/jackdavis
http://www.photolightimages.com/
From: jn289
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:21 AM
Subject: PESO - SPIDER
I shot this spider the night before the Morning Glory photos. In the
folder the the first 12 photos are of the same s
Well done!
On Aug 23, 2012, at 8:02 PM, Mark C wrote:
> On 8/22/2012 2:21 PM, jn289 wrote:
>> I shot this spider the night before the Morning Glory photos. In the folder
>> the the first 12 photos are of the same spider with different flash settings
>> and using two flashes..Thanks for looking.
On 8/22/2012 2:21 PM, jn289 wrote:
I shot this spider the night before the Morning Glory photos. In the
folder the the first 12 photos are of the same spider with different
flash settings and using two flashes..Thanks for looking..Joe
http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=1037064
O -
n be dismissed without proof." --
> Christopher Hitchens
>
> --- Original Message ---
>
> From: jn289
> Sent: August 22, 2012 8/22/12
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: PESO - SPIDER
>
> I shot this spider the night before the Morning Glory photos. In the
> fo
Those are amazing! How big was it?
cheers,
frank
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: jn289
Sent: August 22, 2012 8/22/12
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - SPIDER
I shot this spider the night
I'm sure its a great photo
Dave
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:21 PM, jn289 wrote:
> I shot this spider the night before the Morning Glory photos. In the folder
> the the first 12 photos are of the same spider with different flash settings
> and using two flashes..Thanks for looking..Joe
>
> http://p
That's one scary lookin' critter!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:21 PM, jn289 wrote:
> I shot this spider the night before the Morning Glory photos. In the folder
> the the first 12 photos are of the same spider with different flash setting
Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:21 AM
Subject: PESO - SPIDER
I shot this spider the night before the Morning Glory photos. In the folder the
the first 12 photos are of the same spider with different flash settings and
using two flashes..Thanks for looking..Joe
http://photo.net/photodb/folder
I shot this spider the night before the Morning Glory photos. In the
folder the the first 12 photos are of the same spider with different
flash settings and using two flashes..Thanks for looking..Joe
http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=1037064
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.n
, too.
Cheers,
frank
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
Sent: May 30, 2012 5/30/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: PESO: Spider Mouse?
I found th
I found this dude trying to emulate Spidey by climbing the walls on Broadway:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15813346
I heard he was trying to rescue the New York Street walker I featured
here earlier:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15813352&size=md
Comments are always appreci
On 10/12/2011 10:32 AM, steve harley wrote:
on 2011-10-10 23:22 Walt Gilbert wrote
So, I cropped the hell out of it, sharpened the hell out of it, added
some
"film grain" to it, converted it to monochrome and made it into a
silhouette.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/6233509410
on 2011-10-10 23:22 Walt Gilbert wrote
So, I cropped the hell out of it, sharpened the hell out of it, added some
"film grain" to it, converted it to monochrome and made it into a silhouette.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/6233509410/
K100Ds, M 50/2, ISO 200, f/16, 1/500
I've to
On 10/11/2011 7:04 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Thanks, Keith!
I'm not sure if there's a name for the technique I used on this one,
but if there is, it's probably French for "hiding flaws".
Mark!
;-)
On 10/11/2011 4:37 PM, Keith Mosier wrote:
Good shot! I like what you did.
I need to exper
Thanks, Keith!
I'm not sure if there's a name for the technique I used on this one, but
if there is, it's probably French for "hiding flaws".
;-)
On 10/11/2011 4:37 PM, Keith Mosier wrote:
Good shot! I like what you did.
I need to experiment more with techniques like this with some of my
Good shot! I like what you did.
I need to experiment more with techniques like this with some of my shots.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions
On 10/11/2011 10:19 AM, frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a spider shot I took today using Larry's K100Ds with my M 50/2
attached. It was under pretty deplorable photography conditions, but it was
the only time I've had a chance to get
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a spider shot I took today using Larry's K100Ds with my M 50/2
> attached. It was under pretty deplorable photography conditions, but it was
> the only time I've had a chance to get a shot of this particular spider --
> one
Hi all,
Here's a spider shot I took today using Larry's K100Ds with my M 50/2
attached. It was under pretty deplorable photography conditions, but it
was the only time I've had a chance to get a shot of this particular
spider -- one of three within a few yards of each other with webs built
b
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
> On 9/28/2011 7:18 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the warning. I'm sure its a great shot.:-)
>>
>> Dave
>
> Anytime, David. I think you're the reason I posted the warning in the
> title, in fact. I recall someone on the list getti
On 9/28/2011 7:18 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Thanks for the warning. I'm sure its a great shot.:-)
Dave
Anytime, David. I think you're the reason I posted the warning in the
title, in fact. I recall someone on the list getting the heebie-jeebies
from a spider photo a while back and saying som
On 9/28/2011 8:00 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 9/28/2011 5:55 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 9/28/2011 7:22 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 9/28/2011 5:05 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 9/28/2011 6:47 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 9/28/2011 4:30 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
While mowing the grass today, I ha
On 9/28/2011 5:55 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 9/28/2011 7:22 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 9/28/2011 5:05 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 9/28/2011 6:47 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 9/28/2011 4:30 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
While mowing the grass today, I happened upon a rather sizable and
horrendo
On 9/28/2011 7:22 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 9/28/2011 5:05 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 9/28/2011 6:47 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 9/28/2011 4:30 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
While mowing the grass today, I happened upon a rather sizable and
horrendous-looking spider having a bite to eat in t
On 9/28/2011 5:05 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 9/28/2011 6:47 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 9/28/2011 4:30 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
While mowing the grass today, I happened upon a rather sizable and
horrendous-looking spider having a bite to eat in the backyard and
figured I ought to try ou
Thanks for the warning. I'm sure its a great shot.:-)
Dave
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While mowing the grass today, I happened upon a rather sizable and
> horrendous-looking spider having a bite to eat in the backyard and figured I
> ought to try out Larry
On 9/28/2011 6:47 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 9/28/2011 4:30 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
While mowing the grass today, I happened upon a rather sizable and
horrendous-looking spider having a bite to eat in the backyard and
figured I ought to try out Larry's K100D Super with the reversed K
On 9/28/2011 4:30 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
While mowing the grass today, I happened upon a rather sizable and
horrendous-looking spider having a bite to eat in the backyard and
figured I ought to try out Larry's K100D Super with the reversed K
50/1.4. I have to say, I'm rather pleased
Hi all,
While mowing the grass today, I happened upon a rather sizable and
horrendous-looking spider having a bite to eat in the backyard and
figured I ought to try out Larry's K100D Super with the reversed K
50/1.4. I have to say, I'm rather pleased with the results.
http://www.flickriver.
Looks cool, I love the color of the snail. Very beautiful. Snails
are so shy!
rg2
On 9/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a message dated 9/23/2007 8:50:04 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Too bad about the OOF stalk!
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http:/
In a message dated 9/23/2007 8:50:04 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Too bad about the OOF stalk!
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
=
Yeah, sorry, Bruce, that ruins it for me.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I
Bruce,
I like the snail, but not the stalks.
Overall, the shape of a spider is there, but I don't like the confusion.
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/23/07, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Snails are more difficult to get good shot when they are in the
> vegetation. If you disturb them, they with
Too bad about the OOF stalk!
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Spider Snail
> Snails are more difficult to get good shot when they are in the
> vegetation. If you disturb th
it works well - nice shot Bruce!
ann
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>Snails are more difficult to get good shot when they are in the
>vegetation. If you disturb them, they withdraw into their shells, so
>you have to leave the environment alone.
>
>When I shot this guy, I wished some of the plant stalks w
I think I've told you that I hate you before...
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Snails are more difficult to get good shot when they are in the
> vegetation. If you disturb them, they withdraw into their shells, so
> you have to leave the environment alone.
>
> When I shot this guy, I wished some of the pl
Snails are more difficult to get good shot when they are in the
vegetation. If you disturb them, they withdraw into their shells, so
you have to leave the environment alone.
When I shot this guy, I wished some of the plant stalks weren't there.
But as I looked at it on a bigger screen, it almost
In a message dated 6/22/2007 2:24:39 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Those who are Arachnophobic have been warned: SPIDER PICTURE
The wife and I were walking across a bridge at sunset and came across
this guy. I had the Fujifilm F30 on my belt so I took a quick
pi
That is kind of a cool shot with the spider just hanging there like it
was hovering. Nicely done, especially with the little camera.
--
Bruce
Friday, June 22, 2007, 2:17:29 PM, you wrote:
CR> Those who are Arachnophobic have been warned: SPIDER PICTURE
CR> The wife and I were walking across
What a great and novel backdrop for a spider pic!
Technically very well done, too. Very nice!
Rick
--- Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those who are Arachnophobic have been warned:
> SPIDER PICTURE
>
> The wife and I were walking across a bridge at
> sunset and came across
>
Those who are Arachnophobic have been warned: SPIDER PICTURE
The wife and I were walking across a bridge at sunset and came across
this guy. I had the Fujifilm F30 on my belt so I took a quick
picture of the little guy.
There's a lot a person could have fiddled with in terms of the
appea
>
> From:
> mike wilson
> From: Graham Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2007/06/20 Wed AM 07:46:04 GMT
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: PESO spider eyes
> >
> > Hi
> > I just received this and other WIMs I think from you
Graham Palmer wrote:
> Just thought you'd like to know your post has gone astray.
>
>
>
Mark!
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Palmer"
Subject: Re: PESO spider eyes
> Hi
> I just received this and other WIMs I think from you re topics on
> Pentax forum.
> Must be a glitch somewhere as they are not topics I have raised or
> even read.
> Jus
t;
> > From: Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2007/06/19 Tue PM 06:12:14 GMT
> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> > Subject: Re: PESO spider eyes
> >
> > Yes very shallow. 25 of 30 shots out of focus.
> > Thanks for looking.
> >
> &
>
> From: Graham Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/06/20 Wed AM 07:46:04 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PESO spider eyes
>
> Hi
> I just received this and other WIMs I think from you re topics on
> Pentax forum.
> Must be a glitc
uracy lately? Might be worth looking for the thread
here that details how to assess and adjust it.
>
> From: Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/06/19 Tue PM 06:12:14 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: PESO spider eyes
>
> Yes very shallow.
Checked focus accuracy lately? Might be worth looking for the thread here that
details how to assess and adjust it.
>
> From: Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/06/19 Tue PM 06:12:14 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: PESO spider eyes
>
On 6/18/07, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some sort of common jumping spider. The eyes of the little creature
> are really big and shiny. In fact my silhouette is visible in the eyes
> of the beast.
>
> If you have a some form of arachnophobia please don't look!
>
> http://leende.net/peso/2007
Unusual and interesting. Looks like an old sci-fi movie clip. Good job.
Tom C.
>From: Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: pdml@pdml.net
>Subject: PESO spider eyes
>Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:49:40 +0200
>
>Some sort of common jump
Thanks Paul en Steve. This shot won't see the wall. My wife hates
spiders. I don't know why. Most of them are very friendly creatures.
On 6/19/07, Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The shallow DOF and the sharp eyes enhance the "spookiness". I like it
> quite a bit, although maybe not
The shallow DOF and the sharp eyes enhance the "spookiness". I like it
quite a bit, although maybe not 16 x 20 on my wall.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Nice capture. Talk about shallow depth of field
> >
> > Kenneth Waller
> >
> > - Original Message -----
> > From: "Toine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: PESO spider eyes
> >
> >
> > > Some sort of commo
Yes very shallow. 25 of 30 shots out of focus.
Thanks for looking.
On 6/19/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice capture. Talk about shallow depth of field
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Toine" <[EMAIL PR
Nice capture. Talk about shallow depth of field
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Toine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO spider eyes
> Some sort of common jumping spider. The eyes of the little creature
> are really big and shiny. In fact my silhou
Some sort of common jumping spider. The eyes of the little creature
are really big and shiny. In fact my silhouette is visible in the eyes
of the beast.
If you have a some form of arachnophobia please don't look!
http://leende.net/peso/20070618
--
Toine
http://leende.net/peso
--
PDML Pentax-Di
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
