I didn' think you were putting down the Mz-S, and I also think your
concerns are justified.
- MCC
At 09:30 PM 8/3/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Please don't get me wrong my point was never to put the MZ-S down. I love my
>MZ-S. It is a perfect camera for me and I think it is every bit a
>professiona
Vic wrote:
>I certainly agree that the
> autofocus LX will never be made.
How can one agree on such things? It will be made or not be made regardless of whether
you agree or not :-)
>It may be fun to speculate about what it
> should or should not have but it will never be made.
Theres n
In a message dated 8/2/01 6:15:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pal writes
<< Absolutely not. The MZ-S is not an LX with AF. The director would never
have said that they wanted to make an LX with AF if it was already made;
particularly not in an article on Pentax future di
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Who's going to buy battery hungry, large, auto everything slr that
can shoot 5+ fps in the future? Nobody. People who want these cameras
are going to go digital. Whats left in the 35mm slr field, apart from
the absolute entry l
I dropped one of my LX's in three feet of running water, reached in picked it
out, gt a resistor repalaced and it still works 6 year later
In a message dated 7/31/01 8:52:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Based on these experiences it was a hard decision when I ha
ylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus >>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
the more I think
about it...I do have bills that need payin' ;)
-Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Eric Lawton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus
> I'
I'm "lusting" for an MZ-S and will almost surely buy it. Tax refund is only
weeks away :)
Eric
>From: Darryl Lafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus
>Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 20:13:10 -0500
>
...snipped ...
>Market
Darryl wrote:
> I have set on the side lines an watched the discussion about whether the
> MZ-S was a professional camera and the pipe dream about an autofocus LX
> long enough. Let's fact it folks MZ-S is for the most part an Amateur
> camera and the LX auto focus will never happen. Not beca
Nenad Djurdjevic wrote:
> (Never owned an LX).
Forgive me if I've got the wrong person, but wasn't it you who posted
that long message about how the LX could be improved by the addition
of autofocus, metering changes, built-in winder, etc.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Why should
athersealed (and
that it had a metal case).
Nenad
Perth, Western Australia
- Original Message -
From: Paul Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus
> Nedad,
>
ay, August 01, 2001 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus
> Well, they actually are targetting this market. Doesn't everyone rememeber
> the "Whiz Bang Technology" containing a shot of a blue 4x4 and waterfall?
I
> do agree that they should step
TECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus
>Date: Mon, Jul 30, 2001, 9:24 PM
>
> Nedad,
>
> Thats a damn good idea, maybe they should give you a job as Marketing
> Manager. :)
>
> Cya
> - Original Message -
&
Nedad,
Thats a damn good idea, maybe they should give you a job as Marketing
Manager. :)
Cya
- Original Message -
From: "Nenad Djurdjevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S
14 matches
Mail list logo
