Very cool stack focusing methodology...
Mark
On 3/10/2014 7:32 PM, Bill wrote:
I just don't know what to say about this.
The subject is chock full of awesome
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/xt-1pron1.html
Technical: 13 image focus stack, K3, 100mm f/2.8WR macro at f/4.5.
Super nice. Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 10, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Bill wrote:
>
> I just don't know what to say about this.
> The subject is chock full of awesome
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/xt-1pron1.html
>
> Technical: 13 image focus stack, K3, 100m
Very good. Brings the dust out to a treat!
Chris
On 10 March 2014 23:32, Bill wrote:
> I just don't know what to say about this.
> The subject is chock full of awesome
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/xt-1pron1.html
>
> Technical: 13 image focus stack, K3, 100mm f/2.8WR mac
Quoting Larry Colen :
On Mar 10, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Bill wrote:
I just don't know what to say about this.
The subject is chock full of awesome
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/xt-1pron1.html
Technical: 13 image focus stack, K3, 100mm f/2.8WR macro at f/4.5.
I can?t decid
Very nice! I see lots of dust there though. ;-)
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Bill wrote:
> I just don't know what to say about this.
> The subject is chock full of awesome
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/xt-1pron1.html
>
> Technical: 13 image focus stack, K3, 100mm f/2
On Mar 10, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Bill wrote:
> I just don't know what to say about this.
> The subject is chock full of awesome
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/xt-1pron1.html
>
> Technical: 13 image focus stack, K3, 100mm f/2.8WR macro at f/4.5.
I can’t decide whether to h
nice
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Bill wrote:
> I just don't know what to say about this.
> The subject is chock full of awesome
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/xt-1pron1.html
>
> Technical: 13 image focus stack, K3, 100mm f/2.8WR macro at f/4.5.
>
> enjoy
>
> bill
>
>
On 10/3/14, Bill, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I just don't know what to say about this.
>The subject is chock full of awesome
>
>http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/xt-1pron1.html
Holy mackerel.
Kick a man when he's down why dontcha.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadca
Very nice
B
> On 10 Mar 2014, at 23:33, "Bill" wrote:
>
> I just don't know what to say about this.
> The subject is chock full of awesome
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/xt-1pron1.html
>
> Technical: 13 image focus stack, K3, 100mm f/2.8WR macro at f/4.5.
>
> enjoy
>
I just don't know what to say about this.
The subject is chock full of awesome
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/pictures/xt-1pron1.html
Technical: 13 image focus stack, K3, 100mm f/2.8WR macro at f/4.5.
enjoy
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailma
From: Stan Halpin
I happened across a magazine called Fine Homebuilding. Interesting
because the tips they give on how to do stuff (e.g., build wood
countertops) are geared to the expert rather than the usual "first
you buy a hammer and screwdriver" advice in many woodworking
magazines. (I exagge
How could you ever use that room? Beautiful but...
I wonder how wide the lens was how much post processing was necessary
to keep the geometry good.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Stan Halpin
wrote:
> I happened across a magazine called Fine Homebuilding. Interesting because
>
That is a beautiful floor. Interesting photography angle as well.
TFposting, Stan. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Stan Halpin"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 11:16 PM
Subject: OT: example of product photograph
I happened across a magazine called Fine Homebuilding. Interesting because the
tips they give on how to do stuff (e.g., build wood countertops) are geared to
the expert rather than the usual "first you buy a hammer and screwdriver"
advice in many woodworking magazines. (I exaggerate, of course.)
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: Product photography
>I learned something tonight. Taking pictures of makeup is a lot more
>fun when there's a pretty girl wearing it.
>
How old are you?
49
Do you ever leave your house?
Not as of
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:55:16AM -0600, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Larry Colen"
> Subject: Product photography
>
>
> >I learned something tonight. Taking pictures of makeup is a lot more
> >fun when there's a
...hehehehe... Larry, long ago my (then) wife got worried about a series
of underwear shots I was hired to do. Took her to the studio, the first
day. Woke her up when the session was over, she never tried to return
the next day. :-)
Some photos really are more interesting than others...
lf
L
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Product photography
I learned something tonight. Taking pictures of makeup is a lot more
fun when there's a pretty girl wearing it.
How old are you?
Do you ever leave your house?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Di
I learned something tonight. Taking pictures of makeup is a lot more
fun when there's a pretty girl wearing it.
--
The first step is learning to take great photos,
the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good.
Larry Colen l...@red4est.comhttp://www
One thing I've noticed about those compact fluorescent bulbs is that
they don't put out as much light as they're rated to. The one that is
supposed to put out the equivalent of a 100W incandescent bulb just
*does not*; at least, not to my eye.
I had to replace them with 150W equivalent compacts
Doug Franklin wrote:
> Scott Loveless wrote:
>
Anyway, http://www.twinmoonpottery.com/ is the site
>
Any and all opinions are most welcome.
>
> I'm sorry for taking so long to reply to this. Thanks for the
> information on those lights. I've had a couple of the reflectors for a
> f
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Scott Loveless wrote:
>
>> Anyway, http://www.twinmoonpottery.com/ is the site, and all the photos
>> on the index page are mine.
>
> Nice work, Scott, especially with such limited equipment. You did a
> good job with the lighting.
>
>
>
Thanks, Mark. Much appreciated.
Scott Loveless wrote:
>>> Anyway, http://www.twinmoonpottery.com/ is the site
>>> Any and all opinions are most welcome.
I'm sorry for taking so long to reply to this. Thanks for the
information on those lights. I've had a couple of the reflectors for a
few years, but I've been looking for t
Scott Loveless wrote:
>Anyway, http://www.twinmoonpottery.com/ is the site, and all the photos
>on the index page are mine.
Nice work, Scott, especially with such limited equipment. You did a
good job with the lighting.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Looks good, Scott. Site is pretty attractive. Hope she has luck with that.
Me, too. All of her pottery has a very glossy glaze on it, which makes
it very hard to photograph. Next time I'll be using an SLR and fitting
a polarizer. Hopefully, that will help. My wife
In a message dated 11/2/2007 9:29:35 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey, gang.
About a year and a half ago I made some photographs of pottery for the
mother of a co-worker. I delivered about 70 photos and really didn't
hear much back about after that. Her intention
Ok, thats what i thought the clip on was, and i have at least one of
those around.
I just bought some of those energy type bulbs, like whats in your
light, and i do remember seeing something on a package about daylight.
Looks like i'll be able to try that here at the homestead
Dave
On 11/2/07,
David J Brooks wrote:
> Looks pretty good.
>
> The bulbs intrige me, can you supply a link as to what they and the
> clip on thing look like Scott
>
Sure thing, Dave.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5128301475404787010
The clip light is available at just about any hardwar
Looks pretty good.
The bulbs intrige me, can you supply a link as to what they and the
clip on thing look like Scott
Dave
On 11/2/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, gang.
>
> About a year and a half ago I made some photographs of pottery for the
> mother of a co-worker. I deli
Hey, gang.
About a year and a half ago I made some photographs of pottery for the
mother of a co-worker. I delivered about 70 photos and really didn't
hear much back about after that. Her intention was to get them on a web
site and start an "e-tail" business. It looks now like she's finally
Hi Francis,
good shorts. Some comments:
On the first one, I would play with the lighting more - the lower part
is too bright for my taste, and it could do with less reflection, but
that is quite hard to achieve, if possible.
The second one looks very good. I like the high contrast look with the
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:05:53 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > http://www.photosynth.ca/photo/f/bowls.html
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I think they're kinda cool.
I like them both, but especially the lower one. The highlights on the
left are a bi
Hello Francis,
The first one is quite good in showing the product. I rather like it.
The second one is a bit too artsy for really showing off the piece.
The lighting on the two sides blows out the bowl. Not sure if the
hole in the bag was worth it.
Nice work.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday,
Quoting Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://www.photosynth.ca/photo/f/bowls.html
>
> What do you think?
I think they're kinda cool.
On 4/19/05, Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are a few shots I took for my brother of some of his wood turning.
> I was trying to make them interesting, slightly artsy without getting
> too abstract.
> The top one (shot with M50 2.0 and Vivatar macro TC) was on a glass pie
> pan with a pie
Like it, especially the second one. The smoke seems to be forming a
chain. Nicely captured.
John
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:50:49 -0700, Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here are a few shots I took for my brother of some of his wood turning.
I was trying to make them interesting, slightly artsy
Here are a few shots I took for my brother of some of his wood turning.
I was trying to make them interesting, slightly artsy without getting
too abstract.
The top one (shot with M50 2.0 and Vivatar macro TC) was on a glass pie
pan with a piece of paper on top and a 100 watt table lamp underneath
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:29:26 +1000, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm interested in doing some product photography, mainly shots of smallish objects
>like camera equipment, models and similar.
>
>I'm wondering what equipment i will need, i'm prepared to buy a few bits
I guessed it :)
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: Product Photography
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Collin Brendemuehl" &
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Jones"
Subject: Re: Product Photography
> I think i'm going to try the halogen lamps first. William by
quartz halogen
> lamps i assume you mean the ones with the little globes? they
look like this
> http://www.alphalink.com.au/~n
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Brendemuehl" <> It does take some time to get used
to the new image perspective
> and the relative DOF change. For a hobbyist, that can take a
few
> months.
The poster in question presents himself to the list as a
professional photographer/ retired pho
Hi,
Its just for the web, i'm more interested at this point in getting the
technique ok.
Thanks,
Paul Jones
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 6:01 AM
Subje
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Brendemuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Product Photography
> All of the advert. people I know who work directly with
> photographers won't take anyt
ollin
>Paul Jones wrote:
>
>Hi, I'm interested in doing some product photography, mainly shots of
>smallish objects like camera equipment, models and similar. I'm
>wondering what equipment i will need, i'm prepared to buy a few bits
>and pieces and how i should go about d
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Product Photography
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Jones"
> Subject: Product
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Jones"
Subject: Product Photography
Hi,
I'm interested in doing some product photography, mainly shots
of smallish objects like camera equipment, models and similar.
I'm wondering what equipment i will need, i'm prepared to
Hi,
I'm interested in doing some product photography,
mainly shots of smallish objects like camera equipment, models and
similar.
I'm wondering what equipment i will need, i'm
prepared to buy a few bits and pieces and how i should go about doing
it.
I can use either an
47 matches
Mail list logo
