My experience has been identical to Paul's. By placing the fiilm in a thick
lead bag in my carry-on, I have never had them made me run it through again
or out of the bag, but it almost always guarrantees a hand search of my
carry-on, which is fine with me.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> A number of pe
Levente -Levi- Littvay wrote:
> And do not expecta ny cooperation. Back in August when I came to Lincoln
> I told then that I will have a guitar with me that might not fit through
> the X-ray. A guitar is NOT something you'd want to check. [...]
>
> So they told me to get a soft case and come o
> Just to be nit-picking, I don't believe that it is a
> "right". The FAA
> has guidelines that do allow handchecking, but they are free at
> any time to
> suspend those guidelines. I also believe that it is left to the
> discretion
> of the checker as to if they will allow it or not. My advis
ber 13, 2001 12:25 AM
> Subject: RE: Airport & Postal Scanners Fogging Film
>
> > > In the U.S., FAA regulation still gives you the right to request hand
> > > inspection. The problem is in the rapid turnover of low-wage workers in
> > > screening jobs. They of
ford wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: LeviL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:25 AM
> Subject: RE: Airport & Postal Scanners Fogging Film
>
> > > In the U.S., FAA regulation still gives you the right to
- Original Message -
From: Ken Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: Airport & Postal Scanners Fogging Film
> Print this out and use this next time. It's their own regulations.
>
> THIS
- Original Message -
From: LeviL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:25 AM
Subject: RE: Airport & Postal Scanners Fogging Film
> > In the U.S., FAA regulation still gives you the right to request hand
> > inspe
> From: Joseph Tainter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > The new thing is that ever since September I have always been
> denied
> > hand inspection of film. The only ones they will inspect are when I am
> > carrying ASA 3200. Not like before when I could claim that it is within
> the
> > g
I've never had any problems running film through the X-rays here (carry on),
I wouldn't worry about it...
Norm
LeviL wrote:
> The place I will have to get through an X-ray is in Germany. I assume
> thay have film certified equipment too, but it is worth a try.
-
This message is from the Pentax-
Print this out and use this next time. It's their own regulations.
THIS DATA CURRENT AS OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
14 CFR - CHAPTER I - PART 108
View Part
ยง 108.17 Use of X-ray systems.
(a) No certificate holder may use an X-ray system within the United
States to
> In the U.S., FAA regulation still gives you the right to request hand
> inspection. The problem is in the rapid turnover of low-wage workers in
> screening jobs. They often don't know this.
Can you site this? So at least I can arm my self with a printout. :))
> Overseas - forget it. No hand
> The new thing is that ever since September I have always been denied
> hand inspection of film. The only ones they will inspect are when I am
> carrying ASA 3200. Not like before when I could claim that it is within the
> guidelines to have it inspected by hand.
>
> Ce
you can look up fedex international shipping costs on their web-site
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Hello
I just exchanged a round of e-mails with BHPhoto. Thay say they ship
fedex who does not X-Ray nor do they Antrax deconteminate. I am a little
worried about the cost of an international package though. Anybody has
experience how much shipping is to Europe through them.
I have read severa
On Tuesday, December 11, 2001, at 03:28 PM, Robert Payne wrote:
> The NPH is good stuff, I've shot a bunch of it rated at 320 ISO.
I also quite like NPH. It's a nice, low contrast, good skin tone film,
with very fine grain for a 400 ISO. Don't expect vibrant, punchy
colours: NPH is quite na
The NPH is good stuff, I've shot a bunch of it rated at 320 ISO.
Robert
snip...
my order for NPH 400 and NPZ 800.
Anyone have any opinions on either film?
Thanks again,
Delano
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the direc
They were'nt letting anything other than keys go through without getting
scanned at DIA, Dulles or Paris-CDG.
>From: "Mick Maguire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Airport & Postal Scanners Fo
gt;To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Airport & Postal Scanners Fogging Film
>Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:15:32 -0500
>
>In a message dated 12/11/2001 11:45:03 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> > New
has anybody tried carrying the film in their pockets through the gate,
rather than in baggage? Is the metal in the film canisters too much? If it
was then perhaps they could be persuaded to allow it not to be scanned.
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To un
19 matches
Mail list logo
