Re: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-14 Thread Fred
> Well, I guess, "S" and "L" just stand for short lenses versus Long > lenses, but the "L" converters themselves are quite "Long" too :-) I've always assumed that the "L" stood for "long" TC and the "S" for "short" TC, rather than referring to the focal lengths of the lenses to be attached. (How

RE: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-14 Thread Jan van Wijk
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:41:45 -0400, TM wrote: >You've answered a question of mine before I've even asked it- >I was always wondering what the differences were between the -S >and the -L convertors. Thanks. > Well, I guess, "S" and "L" just stand for short lenses versus Long lenses, but the "L"

Re: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-14 Thread Steve Larson
Me thinks you`re not using the right stuff. Last weekend I used my 1000/8 SMCT with a full set of Asahi extension tubes, a Vivitar 2X Macro Teleconverter and an LX on a Bogen 3051 with a 501 video head and got a close up of an owls face, you can see every feather around its beak, and focusing was

Re: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-14 Thread Pål Audun Jensen
JCO: >Did Pentax make a high performance >K mount 2X teleconvertor for long lenses? >I want one to try on my SMCK 1000mm >F8. Pentax made a 2X-L converter dedicated to the longer A* series ED lenses. It works OK with these lenses. Otherwise, no non-dedicated 2X converter gives great results

Re: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-11 Thread Fred
> Did Pentax make a high performance K mount 2X teleconvertor for > long lenses? I want one to try on my SMCK 1000mm F8. The best Pentax TC's for long lenses (but only for lenses that can fit their "snouts" into the K-mount end of the lens) are the "L" models (A 1.4X-L and A 2X-L). I don't know

Re: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-11 Thread Fred
> Did Pentax make a high performance K mount 2X teleconvertor for > long lenses? I want one to try on my SMCK 1000mm F8. If not > Pentax, who made the best one? I dont care about meter coupling, > I'll be using manual exposure. Although I've never tried it with a 1000mm lens, a really sweet non-P

RE: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-11 Thread Mark Erickson
Rogier wrote: > That raises a quick question... > > Is there a limit to the usage of a teleconvertor? Wouldn't > putting a 2x tc on a 1000mm making it very slow? > > regards, > > Rogier Absolutely. Such a setup has really limited uses, I'd imagine. Filling the frame with a giant sunset/

Re: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-11 Thread Fred
> I just dug out the Pentax user manual for the Rear Converter A's, > JCO, and it seems that: [snip] Gee, the net works in strange and marvelous ways. The above was from a follow-up post I made some time after submitting a couple of earlier posts to this thread (but which I haven't seen coming b

RE: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-11 Thread TM
Jan, You've answered a question of mine before I've even asked it- I was always wondering what the differences were between the -S and the -L convertors. Thanks. The "snout" to which you refer- is that cause for incompatibility with certain lenses of a more conventional focal length, like a 80-20

Re: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-11 Thread Fred
> Did Pentax make a high performance K mount 2X teleconvertor for > long lenses? I want one to try on my SMCK 1000mm F8. I just dug out the Pentax user manual for the Rear Converter A's, JCO, and it seems that: 1. The A 2X-S should work OK on the K 1000/8. 2. The A 1.4X-S will show some corne

Re: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-11 Thread Jan van Wijk
Hi JCO, On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 02:45:14 -0400, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >Did Pentax make a high performance >K mount 2X teleconvertor for long lenses? >I want one to try on my SMCK 1000mm >F8. > I think the 'best' one quality wise would be the "rear converter-A 2X-L" This is a large (over 2 inches l

RE: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-10 Thread J. C. O'Connell
Yes, it will be a 2000mm F16! JCO > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rogier van der Peijl > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Best 2X TC for K mount > > > T

Re: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-10 Thread Rogier van der Peijl
That raises a quick question... Is there a limit to the usage of a teleconvertor? Wouldn't putting a 2x tc on a 1000mm making it very slow? regards, Rogier >From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Best 2X TC for K mount >Dat

Re: Best 2X TC for K mount

2002-04-10 Thread Nitin Garg
I read somewhere (dont remember where) that 7 element converters are much better than 4 element ones (or was it the other way round ? :)) I guess thats not much of a help :D On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:45:14AM -0400, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Did Pentax make a high performance > K mount 2X teleco