Ryan K. Brooks wrote:
>Somewhat on topic, since it's pentax gear.
>
>I'm about to go on a trip that includes a day at the Venice Rookery- so
I
>just have to bring along my mint green A*400/2.8 :-). Question is, I've
>flown since 9/11- but not with the 400- has anyone had problems carrying
>on bi
Actually it's probably better.
At 12:17 PM 3/27/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Ryan,
>
>I recently flew out of O'Hare. On my return (through Wichita) I had
>no problem having a rather large macro zoom in my backpack. I allowed
>this to go through the x-ray machine (without a body or film of
>cours
Ryan,
Last week I flew out of the Detroit, Phoenix and San Diego airports. I carried a
fairly large shoulder bag with two bodies and several lenses, including an FA 80-200
f2.8. This is not quite as large as your 400, but it's no midget either. It only
drew attention in Detroit, where I had
> [snip] so I just have to bring along my mint green A*400/2.8 :-).
> [snip] I'm leaving from O'Hare- and meet all the carry on
> requirements, but a bit concerned that they won't like this big,
> heavy, club like item in my carry on. I don't really trust
> checking it, even in it's case. [snip
k an extra 5-6
> minutes. Small price to pay.
>
> (I fedex'ed my film, which I did before 9/11 as well)
>
> Oh, and the lens is still green :-),
>
> R
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROT
When I flew to Halifax and back (from Toronto) last week, I was amused when they
asked me at both security checks to "turn on my cameras". I guess they wanted to
hear them make electronic beeping or whirring sounds. I had to explain to them
that they were mechanical bodies (ok, I know that the M
6 matches
Mail list logo
