Larson IIRC
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: Flash for 67
degrees.
>
> Who makes the Sof'Shoulder?
>
Paul,
So what kind of bracket do you use? I currently have been using a
Stroboframe Pro RT. This allows the flash to be flipped for
verticals. I can't see how a potato masher could be hooked up to it.
Bruce
Thursday, April 3, 2003, 10:45:05 AM, you wrote:
PS> I don't know who made the Sof
I don't know who made the Sof'Shoulder. It's at least 25 years old, and
it may not be available any more. I think most of the AF400T units do
have the fully rotating head. But ask before you buy. When shooting with
the flash pointing forward, I generally use a bracket that places it
above the camer
Paul,
Sounds like I would have to know if it could swivel 180 degrees.
Who makes the Sof'Shoulder?
Have you considered any issue with using it to the side of the camera?
Always a concern for side shadows. That is probaby my biggest concern
at this point.
Bruce
Thursday, April 3, 2003, 10:0
I use it on a reflector umbrella called the Sof'Shoulder. The flash
points to the rear and fires into the umbrella. Unfortunately, I can
only use it manually with this type of setup, since I have the early
AF400T that won't rotate a full 180 degrees. (I use a flashmeter.)
However, with the later mo
Paul,
Very good information. I would be using this mostly for wedding work
for flash fill in daytime and main lighting during evenings for the
candids. I have typically used a flash bracket an Lumiquest Softbox
to keep the redeye out and shadows out of the way.
Do you have your AF400T on the st
Hi Bruce,
I don't have the 500FTZ, but I use the AF400T regularly with my 6x7. I
frequently use it with a Sof'Shoulder reflector umbrella for portraits.
I have to turn the power down to 1/4 to get as wide as f11 with ISO 400
film, so it certainly has plenty of punch. I use it with the Quantum
batte
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> The Quantum Q-Flash is something that always held a
> strange allure for me,
> despite its' price. Anyone here ever used one?
> I know Graywolf has a Norman; the Q-Flash appears to be a
> Norman on steroids?
T
The Quantum Q-Flash is something that always held a strange allure for me,
despite its' price. Anyone here ever used one?
I know Graywolf has a Norman; the Q-Flash appears to be a Norman on steroids?
Kind regards
Peter
riginal Message -
From: "Mat Maessen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: Flash for 67
> What about one of the Metz handle flashes?
> I love my 45CT-4, it has PLENTY of power, and the auto (non-TTL) modes
>
What about one of the Metz handle flashes?
I love my 45CT-4, it has PLENTY of power, and the auto (non-TTL) modes
are
pretty much spot on.
Only downside is that it does tend to eat AA batteries. I really need to
hunt
down some of the NiCD packs and a charger for it.
-Mat
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
>
What about one of the Metz handle flashes?
I love my 45CT-4, it has PLENTY of power, and the auto (non-TTL) modes
are
pretty much spot on.
Only downside is that it does tend to eat AA batteries. I really need to
hunt
down some of the NiCD packs and a charger for it.
-Mat
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> The Quantum T2 still looks great, but at twice the price.
You can find Quantum T's used for pretty cheap. Keep an eye on ebay.
Check the quantum site to see what the differences are...they're not a
big deal for me
Jostein,
Thanks for the info.
As near as I can tell, the 400T has a GN of 40 at an effective
coverage of 28mm. My manual for the 360FGZ says that it has a GN of
36 when zoomed to 85mm coverage, GN 30 at 50mm and GN 22 at 28mm.
Based on that, it seems that the 400T actually has about twice the
po
Got some experience with the two Pentax flashes on a Z-1, Bruce.
the 500FTZ has more power than the 400T. However, I prefer the 400 for
macro work, because it can quench the burst much faster that the 500
can. At 1:1 with a FA100/2.8 macro, the 500FTZ gives just too much,
even on the widest zoom se
15 matches
Mail list logo
