On 22/4/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Great letter, Jon!
Pentax is the 'Apple' of the camera industry. I love it! g
I tend to think of Pentax as the 'Pentax' of the camera industry.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
På 23. apr. 2005 kl. 09.52 skrev Cotty:
On 22/4/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Great letter, Jon!
Pentax is the 'Apple' of the camera industry. I love it! g
I tend to think of Pentax as the 'Pentax' of the camera industry.
Sure, but they do have a lot in common. The users
On 23/4/05, DagT, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sure, but they do have a lot in common. The users have chosen not to
follow the masses and advertising campaigns . They represent the
independent users who like to make their own decisions (and mistakes)
.-)
And if I use Apples and Canons, how
On 4/23/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/4/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Great letter, Jon!
Pentax is the 'Apple' of the camera industry. I love it! g
I tend to think of Pentax as the 'Pentax' of the camera industry.
Actually, my motive for writing what
The only reason Apple currently exists is their advertising campaigns,
Pentax exists in spite of theirs...
DagT wrote:
På 23. apr. 2005 kl. 09.52 skrev Cotty:
On 22/4/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Great letter, Jon!
Pentax is the 'Apple' of the camera industry. I love it! g
I
Cotty, you make mistakes no one else even though of...
Cotty wrote:
On 23/4/05, DagT, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sure, but they do have a lot in common. The users have chosen not to
follow the masses and advertising campaigns . They represent the
independent users who like to make their
if any company can pretend to be that, it should be cosina. not pentax
by any measure you can come up with (other than lack of market share).
best,
mishka
On 4/22/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax is the 'Apple' of the camera industry. I love it! g
cheers,
frank
--
Apple's success is due more to good product, good PR and word-of-mouth
cult status than advertising. The ads play a role, but other factors
are much more important. And that's from an ad guy.
On Apr 23, 2005, at 10:58 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
The only reason Apple currently exists is their
York Times DSLR article
The only reason Apple currently exists is their advertising campaigns,
Pentax exists in spite of theirs...
DagT wrote:
På 23. apr. 2005 kl. 09.52 skrev Cotty:
On 22/4/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Great letter, Jon!
Pentax is the 'Apple
Pentax is a publicly traded company. i don't know who owns most of the
shares, but there are several corporate holders at least.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: New York
On 4/23/05, Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if any company can pretend to be that, it should be cosina. not pentax
by any measure you can come up with (other than lack of market share).
I don't think anyone said that Pentax holds themselves out as the
Apple of the photography industry, I just
A good lawyer also does his research...
And asks only questions he knows the answer to
Kenneth Waller (deals with more lawyers than he wants to)
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Apr 21, 2005 7:44 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New York
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A good lawyer also does his research...
And asks only questions he knows the answer to
...and *wants to hear* the answer to!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On 4/22/05, Jon Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, Cotty, he did. In fact, I also wrote him, but at the time, I
hadn't had a chance to fire up gmail, so did not know of the
discussion here I was in a hurry, but, to join in the party, here
is what I wrote him...
---
Dave-
Good for you, Paul. It's a pretty good note that you've written. I was
tempted to send a variation of your email, but I've not read the article
yet, so my comments will have to go out later. Thanks for bringing this to
my (our) attention.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, well I'm going to ignore what you say and run right out to the pro
shop in town, Wolf Camera. And then I'll buy whichever Canon or Nikon is
cheaper along with the best Quantaray lens.
Nicely written letter.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Paul,
Following you suggestion, I've emailed him too. See below my slightly
revised text.
Thanks,
Dario
Hi David,
I think someone failed you in researching material for your column,
Professional Cameras, Made for the Amateur, which appeared in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have a copy of today's New York Times take a look at the first
page of the business section. There you'll find an article about
prosumer dslr cameras that mentions only Nikon and Canon offerings. I
sent the following e-mail to the author, David Pogue. Others might
On 21/4/05, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, unleashed:
Considering how many books he's written, I suspect he might reconsider
his omission as just that, a sin of omission, not an intentional slight.
To be fair, he doesn't mention Minolta or Olympus, does he?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
Cotty wrote:
On 21/4/05, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, unleashed:
Considering how many books he's written, I suspect he might reconsider
his omission as just that, a sin of omission, not an intentional slight.
To be fair, he doesn't mention Minolta or Olympus, does he?
Not in any of his books
an FYI re - Pogue - I subscribe to NYTIMES on
line and enjoy getting
the weekly letter/column on all things computer
that Pogue writes for the
recently discontinued Circuits section of the
Thurs Times... looks like
they moved him and other computer stuff to the
business section...
He seems very
On 21/4/05, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, unleashed:
To be fair, he doesn't mention Minolta or Olympus, does he?
Not in any of his books I've read. Only H-P, Nikon and plenty of Canon
references...
I meant in the newspaper article
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
Cotty wrote:
On 21/4/05, Keith Whaley, unrediscombobulated, lashed out:
To be fair, he doesn't mention Minolta or Olympus, does he?
Not in any of his books I've read. Only H-P, Nikon and plenty of Canon
references...
I meant in the newspaper article.
Oh.
Cheers,
Cotty
'Pyours,
keith
On 21/4/05, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, unleashed:
'Pyours,
Watch it fly-boy ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 4/21/05, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Like a good lawyer, he only talks about those things about which he
knows, and can speak intelligently.
snip
A good lawyer also does his research...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
25 matches
Mail list logo
