On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
> On 1/26/10, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>> Hell, I had/have correction tape in my Royal manual typewriter. You really
>> were old school...
>
> Don't use that stuff. It crumbles and falls into the machine, gumming
> up the works something awf
On 1/26/10, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Hell, I had/have correction tape in my Royal manual typewriter. You really
> were old school...
Don't use that stuff. It crumbles and falls into the machine, gumming
up the works something awful. Learn to type betetr or jsut leanr to
live wit hyour mistlake.
On 1/22/2010 7:54 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
I've met some students this week who have never seen a record player (I
quickly told them to google record player and click web images), and I used
the expression *45* and received lots
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:54 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
> I have a couple of hundred 78s, including a few in the old Edison format,
> and a crank-up phonograph to play them on.
> Paul
>
>> Dave
I;'m not sure how many Dad had but IIRC its around 50-75, not really
sure. Sis redid the basement and
Subash wrote:
talking of film, i just got myself a SuperA in beautiful condition: the
electronics, metering, everything works. came with an odd 20mm lens,
RE.Auto-Topcor 20mm 1:4. googled a bit and found out about topcon
cameras and that the voigtlander nokton 58/1.4 is 'derived' from the
topcor
That's what I was thinking. I looked to see if a Jawa was peering
from behind the dumpster.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:48 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Looks like somebody's robot got lost...
>
> On 1/21/2010 9:23 AM, William Robb wrote:
>>
>> No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide "foundview".
>>
Looks like somebody's robot got lost...
On 1/21/2010 9:23 AM, William Robb wrote:
No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide "foundview".
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
William Robb
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
2010/1/24 P. J. Alling :
> On 1/24/2010 8:54 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
>> On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
and I usedthe expression *45* and received lots of
wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to define t
On 1/24/2010 12:00 PM, P N Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Bob W wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then
proceeded to define the term used. :-)
Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then
I have a couple of hundred 78s, incl
2010/1/24 P N Stenquist :
>
> My records aren't vinyl, they're some kind of ceramic. They break if you
> look at them the wrong way.
you mean shellac?
cheers
ecke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vi
On 1/24/2010 8:54 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to
define the term used. :-)
Might
On Jan 24, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Bob W wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then
proceeded to define the term used. :-)
Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then
I have a couple of hundred 78s, including a few in the old
Edison format, and a
> > and I used
> >> the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then
> >> proceeded to define the term used. :-)
> >
> > Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then
> >
> I have a couple of hundred 78s, including a few in the old
> Edison format, and a crank-up phonograp
David Savage wrote:
2010/1/24 mike wilson :
David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded
to
define the term used. :-)
Might just as well not mention my box of 78's
2010/1/24 mike wilson :
> David J Brooks wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
>> wrote:
>> and I used
>>
>>> the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded
>>> to
>>> define the term used. :-)
>>
>>
>> Might just as well not mention my box of
David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to
define the term used. :-)
Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then
Pffft. Cylinders are the real groove, m
On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
> wrote:
> and I used
>> the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to
>> define the term used. :-)
>
> Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then
>
I
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
and I used
> the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to
> define the term used. :-)
Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then
Dave
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> ht
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Christine Aguila" Subject: Re: PESO:
Film is Dead
Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Christine
And I just replied, equally offlist.
And I just went and had another shower - purely due to the photoporn, I
On 1/23/2010 10:11 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Christine Aguila" Subject: Re:
PESO: Film is Dead
In all seriousness, I will keep this offer in mind, Bill. Cheers,
Christine
In all seriousness, this should whet your apetite a
Thanks Paul - but finances won't let me!
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P N
Stenquist
Sent: Sunday, 24 January 2010 11:08 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
On Jan 23, 201
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
Of
William Robb
Sent: Sunday, 24 January 2010 1:12 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: PESO
Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
> In all seriousness, I will keep this offer in mind, Bill. Cheers,
> Christine
>
In all seriousness, this should whet your apetite a bi
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb"
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Ch
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Christine
And I just replied, equally offlist.
best
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_p
Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
In all seriousness, I will keep this offer in mind, Bill. Cheers,
Christine
In all seriousness, this should whet your apetite a bit:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/6x7stuff/fleet67.htm
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:23:50 -0600
"William Robb" wrote:
> From: "Christine Aguila"
> Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
> > And I'm determined to have some cash saved some time later this
> > year for a Pentax medium format film camera.
>
> I&#
From: "William Robb"
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
And I'm determined to have some cash saved some time later this year for
a Pentax medium format film camera.
I'll give you a good deal on some
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
And I'm determined to have some cash saved some time later this year for a
Pentax medium format film camera.
I'll give you a good deal on some very nice 6x7 gear.
William Rob
From: "Christine Aguila"
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
>>Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
>>cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
>>home is the only viable option.
>>
>>I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value.
>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
> I've met some students this week who have never seen a record player (I
> quickly told them to google record player and click web images), and I used
> the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to
> define
From: "Christine Aguila"
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
>>Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
>>cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
>>home is the only viable option.
>>
>>I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value.
>
> A
From: Mark Roberts
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
>cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
>home is the only viable option.
>
>I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value.
About two years ag
On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> Bruce Dayton wrote:
>>
>>> Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
>>> cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
>>> home is the only viab
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
>>Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
>>cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
>>home is the only viable option.
>>
>>I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it s
- Original Message -
From: "John Sessoms"
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
Question for William Robb - What is the function of the building it was
sitting next to?
That building is the back of the warehouse where I (and a whole bunch of
other people) have storage/work
John Sessoms wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
-- Bruce Thursday, January 21, 2010, 6:23:16 AM, you wrote:
>
WR> No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide "foundview".
WR> > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
WR>
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
cost to get color develo
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
>cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
>home is the only viable option.
>
>I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value.
About two years ago I stopped in at one
From: Bruce Dayton
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
-- Bruce Thursday, January 21, 2010, 6:23:16 AM, you wrote:
>
WR> No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide "foundview".
WR> > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
WR> William Robb
Norits
20 AM, you wrote:
WR> - Original Message -
WR> From: "Bruce Dayton"
WR> Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
>> Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
>>
WR> Yup, Back in it's day that was about 25K worth of machinery.
WR&
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:32 AM, eckinator wrote:
> somebody go diving... =(
>
Oh, I would love too. But my wife will kill me, for sure.
-Pasvorn
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton"
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
Yup, Back in it's day that was about 25K worth of machinery.
It was stripped for whatever parts might be useful (bellows pump
somebody go diving... =(
2010/1/22 Pasvorn Boonmark :
> I also bet that more goody were in the red dumpster too.
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Bruce Dayton
> wrote:
>> Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
>>
>> --
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss M
I also bet that more goody were in the red dumpster too.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
>
> --
> Bruce
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
--
Bruce
Thursday, January 21, 2010, 6:23:16 AM, you wrote:
WR> No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide "foundview".
WR> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
WR> William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:23 AM, William Robb wrote:
> No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide "foundview".
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
Looks artsy to me.
A poignant photo that brought a tear to my eye.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri
All thats left is to carve the head stone
Dave
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:23 AM, William Robb wrote:
> No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide "foundview".
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
>
> William Robb
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdm
49 matches
Mail list logo
