[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Well, I was there, so I had to take it, right? :-)
>
After seeing your Albuquerque (yes I think they are cottonwoods, too) trees,
and you having told me you went there,
I knew what this was before I looked at the pic - or at least I
suspected what it was -
still,it is
Ok. He is the genius, so the framing must be brilliant ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
W
Sent: 2. februar 2007 22:16
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: PESO - Famou
Sorry, i meant go detail.
:-)
Dave
On 2/2/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hate it when my photos have goo detail. Usually that happens when I
> drink:-)
> Paul
> On Feb 2, 2007, at 7:34 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
> > Nice.
> > Hilites and shadows all have goo detail, and the g
I hate it when my photos have goo detail. Usually that happens when I
drink:-)
Paul
On Feb 2, 2007, at 7:34 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Nice.
> Hilites and shadows all have goo detail, and the geometry is pleasing.
>
> Man, i gotta get my act together and hook up my 2400
>
> Dave
>
> On 2/1/07,
Nice.
Hilites and shadows all have goo detail, and the geometry is pleasing.
Man, i gotta get my act together and hook up my 2400
Dave
On 2/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I was there, so I had to take it, right? :-)
>
> Nothing super special, but I think it has pleas
> Henri too:
>
>
http://www.magnumphotos.com/Archive/C.aspx?VP=Mod_ViewBox.ViewBoxZoom_
>
VPage&VBID=2K1HZO39IFLO&IT=ImageZoom01&PN=8&STM=T&DTTM=Image&SP=Search
> &IID=2TYRYD1HEIXA&SAKL=T&SGBT=T&DT=Image
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2g6xae
>
> but he didn't need no mephitic Linhof.
>
> Nice to see
it isn't cropped. He framed it that way.
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
> Sent: 02 February 2007 12:38
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: RE: PESO - Famous Back
>
In a message dated 2/2/2007 4:43:22 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henri too:
http://www.magnumphotos.com/Archive/C.aspx?VP=Mod_ViewBox.ViewBoxZoom_
VPage&VBID=2K1HZO39IFLO&IT=ImageZoom01&PN=8&STM=T&DTTM=Image&SP=Search
&IID=2TYRYD1HEIXA&SAKL=T&SGBT=T&DT=Image
http://tin
In a message dated 2/2/2007 5:29:08 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't realize the tourist bureau had ruined the place. It's amazing what
they can do to places that are photogenic.
William Robb
==
Yes. I actually got the best angle on it considering the
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: PESO - Famous Back
> Except with the Linhoff you'd still have all the telephone wires:-).
I didn't realize the tourist bureau had ruined the place. It's amazing what
they can do to places that a
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W" <
Subject: RE: PESO - Famous Back
> Henri too:
> http://tinyurl.com/2g6xae
>
> but he didn't need no mephitic Linhof.
>
> Nice to see it in colour though.
I always thought his version was overwrought and heavy.
Thank's for educating me.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2. februar 2007 04:03
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Famous Back
In a message dated 2/1/2007 6:
2. februar 2007 09:23
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: PESO - Famous Back
Henri too:
http://www.magnumphotos.com/Archive/C.aspx?VP=Mod_ViewBox.ViewBoxZoom_
VPage&VBID=2K1HZO39IFLO&IT=ImageZoom01&PN=8&STM=T&DTTM=Image&SP=Search
&IID=2TYRYD1HEIXA&a
Except with the Linhoff you'd still have all the telephone wires:-).
Paul
On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:34 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: PESO - Famous Back
>
>
>>
>> http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/back.htm
>>
>>
>> Comments we
itic Linhof.
Nice to see it in colour though.
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of William Robb
> Sent: 02 February 2007 04:35
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PESO - Famous Back
>
>
> -
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of William Robb
> Sent: 02 February 2007 04:35
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PESO - Famous Back
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Famous Back
>
> http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/back.htm
>
>
> Comments welcome.
A Linhoff moment.
The light is low, and the camera needs to be somewhat to the left of where
it was.
There's a reason why Ansel
In a message dated 2/1/2007 6:53:20 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A very nice shot; and you did a great job removing the wires. Given
how ruined the site now is, I would love to see a wide angle shot
with the wires and everything else that has intruded on what seem
In a message dated 2/1/2007 6:51:39 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like it, as a picture.
But I don't get the story behind. Some missing cultural references I guess.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
===
It is the Rancho de Taos church, made fa
A very nice shot; and you did a great job removing the wires. Given
how ruined the site now is, I would love to see a wide angle shot
with the wires and everything else that has intruded on what seems to
be a starkly beautiful place.
Micah
On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
I like it, as a picture.
But I don't get the story behind. Some missing cultural references I guess.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2. februar 2007 03:25
To: pdml@pdm
21 matches
Mail list logo
