Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-05 Thread mike wilson
> > From: "Christine Aguila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/04/04 Fri PM 04:34:05 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta > > > - Original Message - > From: "

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Eactivist
Thanks for all the answers. I think checksums or byte comparisons are best, but I will look into what my software offers. Actually, never done any verification, so anything will probably be better than nothing. Marnie aka Doe :-) - Warning: I am n

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Bran Everseeking
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:00:59 -0500 Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is your intent to actually COMPRESS files (which, if they're JPEG > files, won't really happen) or to just "park" them inside of some > larger file structure which has error-checking and such? > > -Charles the

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta > In my blissful ignorance, I've always done the verify. I guess that's because > I've always used > either the apple sofware or toast. Now I

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Doug Franklin
Charles Robinson wrote: > It really depends upon what you're using to run your backups to disc. > But MOST software has an option to immediately do a verify/compare > between your source files and the burned disc immediately after the > disc is written. Having been burned before, I never t

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread pnstenquist
In my blissful ignorance, I've always done the verify. I guess that's because I've always used either the apple sofware or toast. Now I use Toast 9 exclusively. It's excellent. In addition to doing he verify, it automatically will pick the best write speed if you allow it that option. On my LaCi

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread P. J. Alling
Don't use the built in software in XP use something like Nero which will automatically verify the burn, if you ask it to. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 4/4/2008 10:01:56 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> Usually, for me, if a disc is bad, it is ba

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Apr 4, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Charles Robinson wrote: >> Well, actually, Godfrey, not sure how to do a verification/ >> validation pass. >> And you can't help, as you're Mac and I am PC. >> > It really depends upon what you're using to run your backups to disc. > But MOST software has an option to

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Charles Robinson
On Apr 4, 2008, at 14:52, Bran Everseeking wrote: > > I burn 2 dvds and two sets of CDs as backup each month. One is a > straight copy of the originals and edits and the other is a compressed > file copy. I also keep copies on my machine and an hidden directory > on > my son's machine ( he has

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Charles Robinson
On Apr 4, 2008, at 13:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well, actually, Godfrey, not sure how to do a verification/ > validation pass. > And you can't help, as you're Mac and I am PC. > > Marnie aka Doe :-) > Marnie - It really depends upon what you're using to run your backups to disc. But M

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Bran Everseeking
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:22:33 +0100 Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, actually, Godfrey, not sure how to do a > > verification/validation pass. > > And you can't help, as you're Mac and I am PC. > > > > Marnie aka Doe :-) well both are PC's really. I add another confusion as i run

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta > Well, actually, Godfrey, not sure how to do a verification/validation pass. > And you can't help, as you're Mac and I am PC. > I know Nero

RE: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Bob W
> Well, actually, Godfrey, not sure how to do a > verification/validation pass. > And you can't help, as you're Mac and I am PC. > > Marnie aka Doe :-) > A read-after-write check should be built into the hardware (albeit switchable from the operating system). Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 4/4/2008 10:01:56 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Usually, for me, if a disc is bad, it is bad from the beginning. That's why you should *always* run a verification/validation pass immediately after burning a CD/DVD, and make at least two indepe

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread P. J. Alling
o: "pentax list" > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 10:42 AM > Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta > > > >> On 4/4/08, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >> >>> I guess I forgot the ;-)--the >>&g

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread David Savage
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > he feeling that everything is alright with the world, nothing is too > much? E... Dave :-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pl

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have storage paranoia like you do. Probably the best thing to do > is, back > up to CDs/DVDs, two copies, keep on hard disk. Then go in in one > to three > months or so and see if one can get photos off CDs/DVDs. In the past week or t

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Cotty
On 4/4/08, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed: >I'm sorry to say, I don't get the point of the question here. camera? car? >large-sized winkicon? having-a-brain-fart-in-Chicago, Christine Soyou've never actually owned an LX then...? You've never actually experienced that, ahhh,

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Christine Aguila
:42 AM Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta > On 4/4/08, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>I guess I forgot the ;-)--the >>wink, wink, winkicon > > You have an LX? > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Christine Aguila
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It's me. Or, rather, the eight days of two hours sleep. The five second > micronaps aren't working. > > King Zombie I'll send you the link to my online photo gallery--that'll put you right to sleep ;-). Seriously, get so

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Cotty
On 4/4/08, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed: >I guess I forgot the ;-)--the >wink, wink, winkicon You have an LX? -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 4/3/2008 2:11:50 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Godfrey, My point of view is that you haven't validated that you can recover your pictures from the data until you actually do such, or at least do a sample. To say the bits and bites are all the same im

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread mike wilson
> > From: "Christine Aguila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/04/04 Fri PM 02:41:26 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta > > > - Original Message - > From: &qu

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Christine Aguila
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > All the words I mentioned are names. Mike: I know that--and I followed the link. I guess I forgot the ;-)--the wink, wink, winkicon. Cheers, Christine -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/ma

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
If you do a validation of a set of files that you know to be good and generate a checksum, then run the validation again at another time ... and the checksums match ... the files are good. If this weren't true, there would be no point to file validation. Godfrey On Apr 3, 2008, at 2:05 PM, B

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread mike wilson
> > From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/04/03 Thu PM 10:53:58 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:30:00PM -0500, Christine Aguila wrote: > > >

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread mike wilson
> > From: "Christine Aguila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/04/03 Thu PM 10:30:00 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta > > > - Original Message - > From: "m

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-04 Thread AlunFoto
Couldn't make the sound work from this PC, but it seems like a reversed Coca-cola Light Break... Jostein 2008/4/4 Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Although my new one might be Woolfhardisworthy. > > > > Mike: Is this an adjective for that famou

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Christine Aguila
- Original Message - From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Wimpey, at a guess. yes, I think that was the name! Cheers, Christine -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Christine Aguila
lol!!! Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm not at all surprised that the construction workers are in broad > agreement with such a policy - they are terribly enlightened over > here, as this documentary proves: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread John Francis
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:30:00PM -0500, Christine Aguila wrote: > > Apparently, a construction company by the > name of Wimbley (sp?) has banned the famous Wolf whistle. Wimpey, at a guess. (Often jokingly regarded as an acronym for "We Import More Paddies Every Year" - many of the construct

RE: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Bob W
> From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Although my new one might be Woolfhardisworthy. > > Mike: Is this an adjective for that famous British Wolf > whistle or Wolf > call British construction workers are famous for?--Heard a > funny BBC radio > story on the way to work today.

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Christine Aguila
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Although my new one might be Woolfhardisworthy. Mike: Is this an adjective for that famous British Wolf whistle or Wolf call British construction workers are famous for?--Heard a funny BBC radio story on the way to wo

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Doug Franklin
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote: > "Temporarily..." An awful word to pronounce for us Germans. Usually > sounded as if someone had just fed them a glowing hot potatoe. :-)) "vorübergehend" ... hmmm, I see what you mean. :-) -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net h

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Doug Franklin
AlunFoto wrote: > Recently sorted out "ascertain", but I'm still struggling with "superfluous". Superfluous is properly pronounced "extra". :-) -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Doug Franklin
Bob Sullivan wrote: > My point of view is that you haven't validated that you can recover > your pictures from the data until you actually do such, or at least do > a sample. To say the bits and bites are all the same implies no other > glitches in the process. No doubt. The number one most neg

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Bob Sullivan
Godfrey, My point of view is that you haven't validated that you can recover your pictures from the data until you actually do such, or at least do a sample. To say the bits and bites are all the same implies no other glitches in the process. Regards, Bob S. On 4/3/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL P

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread P. J. Alling
I prefer redundant information. AlunFoto wrote: > 2008/4/3, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I bet they taught you the tourist pronunciation, didn't they! Ha ha - >> it gets them every time. I love it when tourists ask me how to find >> their way to 'Suvverk' and 'Lester Square'. I never get tir

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread P. J. Alling
Well my point was that I burned some perfectly good CDs on an HP 2100 burner under Win98. I moved that burner to a machine running Win2K, those CDs were unreadable. They weren't that important so I put them aside to try some data recovery at a later time. I acquired a DVD burner, that was pu

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I run a drive/file system validation utility about once every month or two on my archives. It's too much work to do that frequently on the small capacity media like CD and DVD ... loading and unloading 200-300 of these volumes is days of tedious work ... so I concentrate doing that for the

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I run a drive/file system validation utility about once every month or two on my archives. It's too much work to do that frequently on the small capacity media like CD and DVD ... loading and unloading 200-300 of these volumes is days of tedious work ... so I concentrate doing that for the

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread AlunFoto
The backup heaven is Restore. :-) Jostein 2008/4/3, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I understand the need for archival storage and try to do some. > My main fear is the amount of data I manipulate now and will in the future. > With a large amounts of data, checking the conditions of the back-

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread AlunFoto
2008/4/3, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I bet they taught you the tourist pronunciation, didn't they! Ha ha - > it gets them every time. I love it when tourists ask me how to find > their way to 'Suvverk' and 'Lester Square'. I never get tired of that > joke. > > If you really want to impress the lo

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Bob Sullivan
I understand the need for archival storage and try to do some. My main fear is the amount of data I manipulate now and will in the future. With a large amounts of data, checking the conditions of the back-up becomes an issue. Some of us have encountered problems where the backup hasn't worked for t

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Put your images into industry-standard formats (TIFF, JPEG, DNG) and archive the files. Upgrade the storage medium as the medium is improved by copying the files. Hard drives are the current standard storage medium. These formats will be around for many many years. You don't have to worry

RE: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Bob W
> > > > >iterative > > > > Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word. > > Ach, that's easier than "aperture". :-) > > Recently sorted out "ascertain", but I'm still struggling > with "superfluous". > > The best surprise yet, though, was "Southwark". :-) > > Cheers, > Jostein I bet they taug

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread mike wilson
> > From: AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/04/03 Thu PM 02:01:44 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta > > 2008/4/3, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 3/4/08, AlunFot

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread P. J. Alling
ke wilson wrote: >> From: AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: 2008/04/03 Thu AM 08:19:17 GMT >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" >> Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta >> >> At the agency where I work, we received roughl

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread P. J. Alling
You also need to keep the software and drivers too. (I'd like to think I'm just paranoid...) AlunFoto wrote: > At the agency where I work, we received roughly a TB of documentation > last year. Loads of DVDs and CDs. > > We've had important documentation on DVDs corrupted in less than 2 > years,

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread AlunFoto
2008/4/3, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >iterative > > Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word. Ach, that's easier than "aperture". :-) Recently sorted out "ascertain", but I'm still struggling with "superfluous". The best surprise yet, tho

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread AlunFoto
lol yeah... It needs practice... :-) Jostein 2008/4/3, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Just try again... > > On 4/3/08, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > > >iterative > > > > Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word. > > > > -- > >

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Ralf R. Radermacher
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word. Reminds me of the good old days of German coastal radio station "Norddeich Radio". One of their routine messages was that owing to severe weather the pilotage in the Elbe and Weser estuary had been *temporarily* suspe

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Bob Sullivan
Just try again... On 4/3/08, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >iterative > > Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word. > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=|http://www.cottysna

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread mike wilson
> > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/04/03 Thu AM 08:47:32 GMT > To: "pentax list" > Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta > > On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >iterative > > Holy

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread mike wilson
> > From: AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/04/03 Thu AM 08:19:17 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta > > At the agency where I work, we received roughly a TB of documentati

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread David Savage
At 04:47 PM 3/04/2008, Cotty wrote: >On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >iterative > >Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word. I think it's Norwegian for "Boring as bat s#!t" Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pd

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread Cotty
On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed: >iterative Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.ne

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-03 Thread AlunFoto
At the agency where I work, we received roughly a TB of documentation last year. Loads of DVDs and CDs. We've had important documentation on DVDs corrupted in less than 2 years, and there's far much more money involved with these documents than with any photo. So we regard discs as transport medi

Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta

2008-04-02 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Ralf R. Radermacher" Subject: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Most of my film scans are stored on CDs, and they still read well. Keep your fingers crossed. I've had serious trouble with a whole bunch of CDRs