Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

2005-02-18 Thread Mark Roberts
"Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >A major manufacturer with an existing relationship will have >pre-production copies and specifications >for design and testing. If Sony is going to have the chip in quantity >soon then their major customers already >have something to work with. Bin

Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

2005-02-18 Thread Doug Franklin
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:56:31 -0500, Peter J. Alling wrote: > If they are like most other companies they probably hired a fulfillment > house to handle it for them. These places are usually run on a very > tight budget and the only way for them to make a profit is to run as > lean as possible.

Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

2005-02-18 Thread Peter J. Alling
A major manufacturer with an existing relationship will have pre-production copies and specifications for design and testing. If Sony is going to have the chip in quantity soon then their major customers already have something to work with. John Francis wrote: Mark Roberts mused: Alin Flaide

Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

2005-02-18 Thread Peter J. Alling
If they are like most other companies they probably hired a fulfillment house to handle it for them. These places are usually run on a very tight budget and the only way for them to make a profit is to run as lean as possible. This can lead to very spotty operations. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RE: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

2005-02-18 Thread pnstenquist
The delay wasn't the vendor's fault. It was a Pentax rebate. Based on other comments here, I would say that they are usually very pokey when it comes to sending the rebate. Paul > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > B&H is still bundling a new D with the DA 16-45 for $1599. > > This used to be accomp

RE: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

2005-02-18 Thread Malcolm Smith
OK Paul, > The delay wasn't the vendor's fault. It was a Pentax rebate. > Based on other comments here, I would say that they are > usually very pokey when it comes to sending the rebate. Fair enough, but voucher/rebate/whatever schemes just seem a bizarre way of getting to the bottom line. How

RE: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

2005-02-18 Thread Malcolm Smith
Paul Stenquist wrote: > B&H is still bundling a new D with the DA 16-45 for $1599. > This used to be accompanied by a $200 rebate. I'm not sure if > that rebate is still in effect. BTW, I finally got my rebate > check from Pentax this week. > Took about six months and one letter of complaint.

Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

2005-02-18 Thread Paul Stenquist
B&H is still bundling a new D with the DA 16-45 for $1599. This used to be accompanied by a $200 rebate. I'm not sure if that rebate is still in effect. BTW, I finally got my rebate check from Pentax this week. Took about six months and one letter of complaint. Paul On Feb 17, 2005, at 11:14 PM,

RE: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

2005-02-17 Thread Tom C
Haven't used the DS yet. Picked it up and it felt quite nice, however, with a better one-handed grip. Personally, I don't want to live w/o HyperProgram mode, so if *I* were going to purchase a second, it would have to be another *ist D. Tom C. From: Sid Barras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: pe

Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

2005-02-17 Thread John Francis
Sid Barras mused: > > Hey Gang, > > But I'm wondering, what's the scuttlebutt on a new pentax digital to > update/replace the *istD? > I've not seen anything on the list lately that looked like rumors of > new models from Paal or the other "insiders," so > > Whaddya hear guys? Should I go for