On 4/5/07, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John. I have a question: Does this tactic work?
It works if your goal is to start and win arguments.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
List Demographic and JCO
John. I have a question: Does this tactic work?
I think the number of posts in the resolution threads
suggests otherwise.
The number of times you have been in similar unpleasant situation
also
suggests otherwise IMO.
I honestly think it is time to reconsider
That's great! Thanks for being so understanding. I knew you'd finally get
it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J. C. O'Connell
[...] I am going to start letting people continue
to attack and insult me personally without provocation
and give no response in reply...
[...] that's going to
Øsleby
Sent: 06 April 2007 01:43
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
John. I have a question: Does this tactic work?
I think the number of posts in the resolution threads
suggests otherwise.
The number of times you have been in similar unpleasant
In a message dated 4/6/2007 5:06:51 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If people hadn't started to snipe at him the thread would have petered
out like any other. But this list has developed a nasty little habit
of picking on John at every little opportunity. It's ugly
On 4/6/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If people hadn't started to snipe at him the thread would have petered
out like any other. But this list has developed a nasty little habit
of picking on John at every little opportunity. It's ugly and it's
time it stopped.
That's one take on it.
Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: 6. april 2007 14:07
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
Well said and obviously true.
Paul
On Apr 6, 2007, at 4:47 AM, Bob W wrote:
I really think you should go back to the beginning of the thread about
resolution, and read it again. What
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
On 4/5/07, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John. I have a question: Does this tactic work?
It works if your goal is to start and win arguments.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Erickson
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 4:05 PM
To: pdml
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
Fair enough. Care to answer one more question?
I'm curious about your views on the nature of the added value
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:43 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
John. I have a question: Does this tactic work?
I think the number of posts in the resolution threads suggests
otherwise. The number of times you have been in similar unpleasant
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 3:03 PM
To: pdml
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
Let me ask again:
Do you believe that your ALL CAPS RANTS and aggressive messages add any
value at all to the PDML?
--Mark
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
ALL CAPS MEANS I AM PISSED OFF.
If you actually
, April 03, 2007 8:09 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
Mark,
I've had a peaceful and happy pdml experience since blocking JCO
messages a month or two ago. Suggest you do the same. He seeks an
audience. Regards, Bob S.
On 4/3/07, Mark Erickson [EMAIL
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J. C. O'Connell
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 8:38 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
screw you, I dont seek anything but the truth
Bob i cannot agree with you more.
Since finmding an email client, that has blocking that works, i can
now actually sleep 3-4 hour per night.
I don't miss them at all.
Dave
On 4/3/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
I've had a peaceful and happy pdml experience since blocking JCO
-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
screw you, I dont seek anything but the truth
...
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above
In a message dated 4/4/2007 8:02:45 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I barely remember the Who, that's why I haven't kill filed JCO yet, (and
I didn't have too much trouble with Brad Dobo so I guess in most cases
I've thick skinned).
===
Ditto.
However, while
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, while I understand Doug's desire not to moderate, maybe he should
reconsider at least mild moderation. I wonder how many people have left over
the last year because of one person.
Sorry. I'll try to be nice.
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com
On 4/4/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, while I understand Doug's desire not to moderate, maybe he should
reconsider at least mild moderation. I wonder how many people have left
over
the last year because of one person.
Sorry. I'll try
or the thoughts expressed.
I dont think thats the most important
thing to be concerned with..
jco
-Original Message-
From: pdml-bounces at pdml.net [mailto:pdml-bounces at pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 3:03 PM
To: pdml
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 12:37 PM
To: pdml
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
JC,
You still haven't answered my original question:
Do you believe that your ALL CAPS RANTS and aggressive messages add any
value at all to the PDML?
--Mark
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I think your more
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Erickson
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 12:37 PM
To: pdml
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
JC,
You still haven't answered my original question:
Do you believe that your ALL CAPS RANTS and aggressive
On 4/4/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're a BOOB.
What have you got against boobs?
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
at pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Erickson
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 12:37 PM
To: pdml
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
JC,
You still haven't answered my original question:
Do you believe that your ALL CAPS RANTS and aggressive messages add any
value at all to the PDML
Could be that having nothing against boobs is his problem
WW
On 4/4/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/4/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're a BOOB.
What have you got against boobs?
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Erickson
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 4:05 PM
To: pdml
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
Fair enough. Care to answer one more question?
I'm curious about your views on the nature of the added value. I agree
that
it makes
Homer Bbsss /homer
frank theriault wrote:
On 4/4/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're a BOOB.
What have you got against boobs?
-frank
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb
I guess I view the PDML as an information sharing resource for
Pentax-related photography rather than as a medium for first strike
personal attacks and aggressive countermeasures.
Have a nice day,
--Mark
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
If I dont
take aggressive countermeasures when attacked
I wish I knew it as that myself, but thats
not my experience unfortunately..
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Erickson
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 6:59 PM
To: pdml
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
I guess I view
ALL CAPS MEANS I AM PISSED OFF.
If you actually read what is being said
in the posts I am replying to
you would understand. I dont
start these things but people
simply refuse to not get personal
when they dont have to and they
do it FIRST. I just reply in kind.
Like calling me elitest schmuck
Let me ask again:
Do you believe that your ALL CAPS RANTS and aggressive messages add any
value at all to the PDML?
--Mark
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
ALL CAPS MEANS I AM PISSED OFF.
If you actually read what is being said
in the posts I am replying to
you would understand. I dont
start these
On 3/4/07, Mark Erickson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I believe that most PDML list members look for messages that include
information, links to galleries, and the odd witty interchange involving
Cotty.
Ack I've just wet meself.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
Witty? Hum...
Cotty wrote:
On 3/4/07, Mark Erickson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I believe that most PDML list members look for messages that include
information, links to galleries, and the odd witty interchange involving
Cotty.
Ack I've just wet meself.
--
Entropy
Cotty wrote:
Ack I've just wet meself.
*Canned laughter*
S
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Mark,
I've had a peaceful and happy pdml experience since blocking JCO
messages a month or two ago. Suggest you do the same. He seeks an
audience.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/3/07, Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me ask again:
Do you believe that your ALL CAPS RANTS and aggressive
Mark Erickson wrote:
Talk about pissing into the wind ... I like JCO ... I agree with him
pretty frequently ... but I'm on the verge of putting him in the
killfile because his presentation is annoying.
John, please. Take a chill pill and come back when you're less
emotionally invested. You
35 matches
Mail list logo
