That sounds like fun, or is that just bizarre...
Caveman wrote:
Only problem would be with portraits. Unless you stuff your models
first that is.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Rob Studdert
Subject: RE: help on sale of large format lenses
Just remember however, there's
On 19 Sep 2004 at 15:14, Larry Hodgson wrote:
Since I have gone completely digital I will be selling my large format
lenses. I have the following:
Hi Larry,
Good luck with the sale. So is it safe to assume that you are pleased enough
with the scope and capability of your stitched *ist D
20, 2004 10:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: help on sale of large format lenses
On 19 Sep 2004 at 15:14, Larry Hodgson wrote:
Since I have gone completely digital I will be selling my large format
lenses. I have the following:
Hi Larry,
Good luck with the sale. So is it safe
On 20 Sep 2004 at 21:58, John C. O'Connell wrote:
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA ...
LOL, you are so predictable JCO :-)
Not that
Hi Larry,
Good luck with the sale. So is it safe to assume that you are pleased
enough
with the scope and capability of your stitched *ist D images that you can
no
longer justify retaining the LF system?
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
Yes. Since I shoot landscapes almost exclusively, I don't have to
: help on sale of large format lenses
On 20 Sep 2004 at 22:54, John C. O'Connell wrote:
I'm drawing a blank, what could you do with stitching
that you cant do with a large format camera? Curious.
Don't forget you can stitch LF images too.
Maybe simply to achieve a large final file size
Can you shot for stitching without a tripod?
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Caveman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 11:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: help on sale of large format lenses
Wearing the camera in a pocket and handholding it.
John C
Message-
From: Larry Hodgson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 11:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: help on sale of large format lenses
Hi Larry,
Good luck with the sale. So is it safe to assume that you are pleased
enough
with the scope and capability of your
On 20 Sep 2004 at 23:45, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Maybe, but which is easier, developing and scanning
one LF exposure/negative or shooting and stitching 16 or more
smaller exposures together?
Glad you asked.
For me shooting and stitching a heap of little digitally captured images is easier
On 20 Sep 2004 at 23:46, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Can you shot for stitching without a tripod?
I have made 10 shot panos (in one row) hand held quite successfully.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes. If in doubt, you may always carry one of those small table-top
tripods (fits in a pocket too).
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Can you shot for stitching without a tripod?
JCO
.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 11:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: help on sale of large format lenses
On 20 Sep 2004 at 23:46, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Can you shot for stitching without a tripod?
I have made
But then you would have to carry a table too!
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Caveman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 12:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: help on sale of large format lenses
Yes. If in doubt, you may always carry one of those small table
LOL ;-) Hey JCO, I admit that LF camera gives superior image quality per
shot, however digital is all about convenience, that's its strength.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
But then you would have to carry a table too!
JCO
On 21 Sep 2004 at 0:06, John C. O'Connell wrote:
Im not talking about panoramics, Im talking about
using a DSLR to do normal photography and stitching
both verically and horzontally to simulate LF.
I don't see how you could do that without a tripod
unless you do a lot of overlapping and
That's exactly how you do it, you make sure you're overlapping. The good
news is that it doesn't matter too much how many shots you end up with,
there's plenty of space on those memory cards and it costs nothing to
fill them up.
John C. O'Connell wrote:
Im not talking about panoramics, Im
Look at some of the photos Larry's posted. You'll see that it can be done.
Check some tutorials on line (or off, for that matter).
Shel
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see how you shoot multiexposure landscapes without the
light/scene changing
during the multiple exposures.
It might be that stitching together a number of smaller negatives is easier
and less expensive. Think of the gear the landscape photographer must
carry into sometimes difficult terrain - the size, the weight, and the
cost. With a DSLR every part of that equation is reduced, perhaps
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: help on sale of large format lenses
On 21 Sep 2004 at 0:06, John C. O'Connell wrote:
Im not talking about panoramics, Im talking about
using a DSLR to do normal photography and stitching
both verically and horzontally to simulate LF.
I don't see how you could do
, 2004 12:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: help on sale of large format lenses
Look at some of the photos Larry's posted. You'll see that it can be
done. Check some tutorials on line (or off, for that matter).
Shel
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see how you shoot
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: help on sale of large format lenses
I don't see how you shoot multiexposure landscapes without the
light/scene changing
during the multiple exposures. I often (most of the time) have
to wait for the sun, clouds, etc, even wind
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: help on sale of large format lenses
Maybe, but which is easier, developing and scanning
one LF exposure/negative or shooting and stitching 16 or more
smaller exposures together?
Just a guessbut..I have missed many large
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: help on sale of large format lenses
Around sixteen actually, 3000x4 x 2000x4 (assuming you don't
oversample the RAW
files).
It's a nice wine, for sure..
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: help on sale of large format lenses
Sure. But I'm keen to hear what Larry has to say on the subject as
he is a user
of both systems and has presented several spectacular stitched *ist
D images to
the list in the last few months
Try checking ebay's completed auctions.
the second and third lenses were available
with and without MC so that affects the
values, be sure you compare prices of
same type.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hodgson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 6:14 PM
To:
This one time, at band camp, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I have gone completely digital I will be selling my large format
lenses. I have the following:
What system were they used on?
Kind regards
Kevin
-
__
(_ \
26 matches
Mail list logo
