Re: Teleconverter question

2004-03-11 Thread Kenneth Waller
-Original Message- From: Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Teleconverter question Snip I think there might be something about the optical formula of the F* and FA* 300mm F4.5 lenses that makes them unsuitable for use with teleconverters. --Mark I truly doubt

Re: Teleconverter question

2004-03-10 Thread alexanderkrohe
From: Don Herring [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am planning to get a 1.4-S teleconvertor, mainly to use with my A* 300/4. Can this particular converter be used with a 500/4.5 screw mount (with the screw mount adapter of course)? Yes it can. Also the L-converters (2x-L, 1.4x-L) do work with this

Re: Teleconverter question

2004-03-09 Thread Sas Gabor
Hi, Don Herring wrote: I am planning to get a 1.4-S teleconvertor, mainly to use with my A* 300/4. Can this particular converter be used with a 500/4.5 screw mount (with the screw mount adapter of course)? It can be used of course, but for these focal lengths the 1.4-L converter is

Re: Teleconverter question

2004-03-09 Thread Kenneth Waller
It can be used of course, but for these focal lengths the 1.4-L converter is definitely a better choice Inquiring minds want to know - Why is it the better choice? Ken Waller -Original Message- From: Sas Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Teleconverter question Hi, Don Herring

Re: Teleconverter question

2004-03-09 Thread Mark Erickson
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It can be used of course, but for these focal lengths the 1.4-L converter is definitely a better choice Inquiring minds want to know - Why is it the better choice? Ken Waller The A1.4X-L and A2X-L teleconverters both have lens groups that protrude into

Re: Teleconverter question

2004-03-09 Thread Fred
It can be used of course, but for these focal lengths the 1.4-L converter is definitely a better choice Inquiring minds want to know - Why is it the better choice? Well, it can't be a better choice if it doesn't fit, and the A 1.4-L certainly will not fit the A* 300/4, for example. On the

Re: Teleconverter question

2004-03-09 Thread Rob Studdert
On 9 Mar 2004 at 17:07, Fred wrote: Well, it can't be a better choice if it doesn't fit, and the A 1.4-L certainly will not fit the A* 300/4, for example. On the other hand, I don't know if that TC will fit the 500/4.5 screw mount lens with adapter, so maybe... The nX-L convertors fit the

Re: Teleconverter question

2004-03-09 Thread Rfsindg
Sas, I have the A1.4-S Teleconverter and it works fine with the A300/4 lens. The L teleconverters (A1.4-L and A2.0-L) are for very special applications, big fast glass. They have long snouts that won't fit in the A300/4. The L's are designed for the A300/2.8, A400/2.8, and such. I have the

Re: Teleconverter question

2004-03-09 Thread Don Herring
At 06:15 PM 3/9/04 -0500, you wrote: Sas, I have the A1.4-S Teleconverter and it works fine with the A300/4 lens. The L teleconverters (A1.4-L and A2.0-L) are for very special applications, big fast glass. They have long snouts that won't fit in the A300/4. The L's are designed for the

Re: Teleconverter question

2004-03-09 Thread Rob Studdert
On 9 Mar 2004 at 18:57, Don Herring wrote: That's was my thinking on the 1.4-L and the 300/4. I guess I'll try that converter with the screw mount and go from there. The manual for the Rear Converter A, 1.4x-s, 2x-s, 1.4x-L, 2x-L contains a compatibility cross-reference and is available for

Re: Teleconverter Question

2003-05-30 Thread Peter Jesser
I presume you are going to use this lens with bellows for macro work? You would probably be better off just using the 50 mm and bellows. A 2x teleconverter will turn your 50 mm lens into a 100 mm lens but it will not be a macro and the image quality will inevitably decline. It is the flat

Re: Teleconverter Question

2003-05-30 Thread Peter Alling
Vivitar Macro focusing teleconverter, you can find them on e-bay regularly in both k and ka mount. At 05:07 PM 5/29/2003 -0400, you wrote: Hello, I was wondering if anyone would like throw in a recommendation for a decent budget teleconverter. I would like to use it with my smc-a f/2 50mm and

Re: Teleconverter Question

2003-05-30 Thread Christopher Comer
Thanks everyone for your help. I think I'll just save up a little money and hold off for nicer macro equipment (bellows) or the Pentax 100mm macro lens (the cheap one). That being said, if I'm browsing ebay and see a vivitar macro teleconverter for an amazing deal, I'll grab that. Enjoy the

Re: teleconverter question

2001-04-23 Thread Jan van Wijk
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:13:03 -0700, Bob Keefer wrote: Also, any thoughts on the 1.4X-L? It's the best of all the converters I own (about 5 I think :-) It has the biggest diameter lens elements, no causes less vignetting wide open. Note that it only fits the longer lenses, that have enough

RE: teleconverter question

2001-04-23 Thread Kevin Thornsberry
: Jan van Wijk [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 6:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: teleconverter question On Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:13:03 -0700, Bob Keefer wrote: Also, any thoughts on the 1.4X-L? It's the best of all the converters I own (about 5 I

Re: teleconverter question

2001-04-23 Thread Bojidar Dimitrov
Recently Kevin Thornsberry wrote: I was wanting to put a 2x-L on my A*300/2.8 until I checked Boz's site which says the L converters are for focal lengths greater than 300 mm. Can I or can I not use the 1.4x-L and 2.0x-L on my A*300/2.8? Hi Kevin, I use the exact Pentax wording: S = to

RE: teleconverter question

2001-04-23 Thread Jan van Wijk
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 05:53:17 -0500, Kevin Thornsberry wrote: Can I or can I not use the 1.4x-L and 2.0x-L on my A*300/2.8? Yes you can, it is one of the lenses the x-L converters are designed for ... The note on BOZ's site relates to the f4 and 4.5 lenses, like the F* 300 4.5 Regards, JvW

Re: teleconverter question

2001-04-23 Thread Rfsindg
Kevin, From an 8.5x11 inch Pentax Lens catalogue, page 26 covers SMC-A Rear Converters. The table Usable Lenses with Rear Converter-A says the A*300/2.8 can use all 4 converters (1.4 or 2.0, S or L), but it indicated Better performance can be achieved with the L versions on the A*300/2.8.

Re: teleconverter question

2001-04-23 Thread Kenneth Waller
Bob, I haveused the 1.4X-S with my 300mm FA and get very acceptable results. Other than the obvious difference in lens power, I can't tell from the photo wether I've taken the photo with or without the converter. Ken Waller - Original Message - From: Bob Keefer To:

Re: teleconverter question

2001-04-22 Thread Mark Erickson
Bob, The German Pentax pages include PDF descriptions that list compatibility between lenses and teleconverters. The FA*300/4.5 page is: http://www.foto.pentax.de/produkte/pdf/pentax024400.pdf and it does list the 2X-S teleconverter and FA*300/4.5 as being compatible. The 2X-L is not

Re: teleconverter question

2001-04-22 Thread Rob Studdert
On 21 Apr 2001, at 22:53, Bob Keefer wrote: Hi all: I have the Pentax 2X-S teleconverter, which frankly doesn't produce very sharp images with my FA*300/4.5, not even locked down into the tripod with careful technique. (I get better slides with my son's Canon 300/4.0 with a Canon 2X.

Re: teleconverter question

2001-04-22 Thread PAUL STENQUIST
My A2X-S is very sharp with either my 400/5.6 K or my 200/4 M. I have an 18x12 print of a race car that I shot with the 400/2XS combo that really leaves nothing to be desired in terms of sharpness. I don't think the L converters will fit the 300/4.5, but I could be wrong. Generally, the L