--- Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi,
>
> So, Frank.
>
> What's it going to be then, eh?
>
> Are you going to read the book?
Well, since I have time on my hands these days...
I guess I'll have to now, won't I?
cheers,
frank
=
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possibl
Hi,
> BTW, who's Alex, and what are droogs?
"A Clockwork Orange".
I'm surprised you haven't read the book, Frank! It has a lot to say
about crime, punishment and justice.
Droogs are friends. Alex and his friends live in the future. Anthony
Burgess, the author, wrote the book in the early 1960s
Hi,
frank theriault wrote:
--- mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
Rob Brigham wrote:
http://www.garrard501.com/garrard501.html
Never were as good as
http://www.transcriptors.co.uk/ - at least in
looks. Got to have a Hydraulic Reference to play
jazz on, Frank. You
can pretend to be Ale
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, frank theriault wrote:
> --- mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> > looks. Got to have a Hydraulic Reference to play
> > jazz on, Frank. You
> > can pretend to be Alex and his droogs, too.
> BTW, who's Alex, and what are droogs?
This is a "Clockwork Orange" referen
--- mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
>
> Rob Brigham wrote:
>
> > http://www.garrard501.com/garrard501.html
>
> Never were as good as
> http://www.transcriptors.co.uk/ - at least in
> looks. Got to have a Hydraulic Reference to play
> jazz on, Frank. You
> can pretend to be Alex an
Rob Brigham wrote:
http://www.garrard501.com/garrard501.html
Never were as good as http://www.transcriptors.co.uk/ - at least in
looks. Got to have a Hydraulic Reference to play jazz on, Frank. You
can pretend to be Alex and his droogs, too.
mike
Garrard of cameras... or maybe Pentax has...
Tom C.
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: why I haven't switched to canon
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 08:27:13 +0200
I forgot to say:
You may be right abo
x27;s past
reputation, while producing largely marginal products - as possibly an
example of some camera manufacturers today.
Interesting that they're still around in name.
Tom C.
From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
>
> Gerrard was (I can't imagine they're still around) an
> English turntable company. They were pretty big in
> the 50's and early 60's. They basically made the best
> LP changer around . . .
They also made the turntable equivalent of the K1000 -
the Garrard SP25. Generations of college stu
--- Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I
agree, at least in context (what's a Garrard?) In
> the digital world,
> it does not appear that Nikon can really keep up
> with Canon on the high
> end. I do like the D70 much more than the D-Reb,
> however.
>
Steve,
Gerrard was (I can't ima
Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: why I haven't switched to canon
>Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 08:27:13 +0200
>
>I forgot to say:
>You may be right about older, used Pentax lenses being quite pricy.
OK, I'm gonna play devil's advocate with Jens' post here. Obviously, I'm
not anti-Pentax, since I own a hell of a lot of Pentax stuff. I'm not
pro-Canon either.
People should know by now that my other system is not Canon but Nikon.
I'll buy Canon gear under only two conditions:
1) my employer
et.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 18. juli 2004 04:08
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: why i haven't switched to canon
- Original Message -
From: "wendy beard"
Subject: Re: why i haven't switched to canon
s with it.
http://www.sunny16.net/photos/paw/2004-07-06.html
-Original Message-
From: Lon Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 6:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: why i haven't switched to canon
Amita, that shot is way weaker than I get with the
Sigma 70-
- Original Message -
> From: "Rob Brigham"
>
> I think all of these are pretty weak over 200mm - the Sigma you have is
> actually the best of the bunch. The 80-320 and Sigma 100-300 are far
> worse at 300. They are going to show up a lot worse on digital anyway
> due to the extra 'enla
iamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 6:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: why i haven't switched to canon
>
>
> Amita, that shot is way weaker than I get with the
> Sigma 70-300 APO at 300, wide open, on film. I feel
> your pain.
>
d a 70-300 Sigma Apo for some time, couldn't bring myself to buy one!
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:12:44 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: 70-210 consumer zo
> Here's one example (excuse the poor composition)
> http://www.pbase.com/image/31458299/large
> I uploaded the
> original file in all its glory (2.3M)
> You may be disappointed if you're planning on using your
> 100-300 with the
> istD. At 300 anyway. At 200 it doesn't seem too bad.
> Going to
- Original Message -
From: "wendy beard"
Subject: Re: why i haven't switched to canon
> I have the Sigma 70-300 APO Macro Super. Used it today at the horse
show. I
> nearly cried when I saw the results of shots taken at 300mm
>
> Here's one example (exc
At 01:27 PM 17/07/2004, you wrote:
From: brooksdj
Hope fully by months end or late August depending on sales. I have the
28-105,the Sigma
100-300 dl
and the 35-70 macro for AF and several A and M lenses plus prime M42's
that work better on
it as is my
understanding.
Throw in a Sigma 70-200 F2.8 a
At 01:27 PM 17/07/2004, you wrote:
http://phred.org/~alex/pictures/pentax/reduced/d30-vs-istd.jpg
On the left is a Canon EOS-D30 (with grip) and the 28-135IS lens (not
sure on max apertures). On the right is the *ist D with the 16-45/4
lens (the largest one that I own).
The Canon stuff is probably
Dave,
The *ist D is smaller than the PZ-1/PZ-1p by a considerable amount.
Probably about 3/4 of the size in fact. In terms of small, nothing
touches the *ist D. Many reviewers still complain that the *ist D is too
small, however if you fit the battery grip, I reckon it's damn near
perfect. I do
Hi Alex.
Substitute the D30 with the 1D or 1Ds or MkII and the Pentax will look like a
marble.LOL
One of the Dad's i know at another horse farm let me try his 1D(the 4mp one)last
Saturday
for a few
minutes.I know 30-40 pictures is not a lot to base something on,but i found it a bit
ocward and h
I concur. Ergonomics was a big factor in my decision to go with the
*istD. Viewfinder image and features were also factors. But size for
features was quite important. The Nikon choices were similar in size
to the Canon stuff.
Bruce
Saturday, July 17, 2004, 9:33:56 AM, you wrote:
aw> http://
24 matches
Mail list logo
