On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 06:00 PM, William Robb wrote:
Quite likely NPS. My bad.
Nah, Fuji's bad for making too many films called NPsomething. ;)
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 09:44 PM, William Robb wrote:
I have found NPC to be a film absolutely lacking in inherent
contrast. The only way I have gotten any life out of the stuff
is to use the 77mm lens, which is very contrasty.
Are you sure it was NPC and not NPS? NPS is one of the
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds
Subject: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 09:44 PM, William Robb wrote:
I have found NPC to be a film absolutely lacking in inherent
contrast. The only way I have gotten any life out of the
stuff
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 02:16 PM, Delano Mireles wrote:
Hi all,
Just picked a 5 pack of this film to try out but I'm just curious if
anyone
has had any experiences they would like to share. I'll be taking my
kids
out for some pictures with the Bluebonnets so I was looking for
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 02:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never shot it at anything other than 160 unfortunately but I have
heard people state 100 or 125 maximum rating.
I've always thought that people who say that don't really know how to
use their meter to its fullest and
]]On Behalf Of Len Paris
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
It's just sage advise given by someone who believes that their
way of seeing is the only way to see.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Frits J. Wüthrich
David.I was in the 1 hour lab i use in town here discussing what high ISO
film he could get for me the other day,and i mentioned i might try some
Portra and /or Supra 400,800(indoors) and could he handle this type of
film.He gave me a look and in a strange tone saidi can handle almost
anything.I
I've never shot it at anything other than 160 unfortunately but I have heard people
state 100 or 125 maximum rating.
If you've got a 5 pack, you've got room to play with - so maybe shoot a roll at 100 or
even, dare I say, 80 (if the day is bright and sunny and all).
You'll get a similar
If you are having it done at a commercial lab, i.e. not custom processing, it
will make no difference since the printer will auto compensate for any
difference and try and produce what it considers a properly exposed print.
Jerry in Houston
Subj:RE: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
seen, in the prints.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:53:45 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
If you are having it done at a commercial lab, i.e. not custom processing, it
will make
Wüthrich
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
Jerry,
It's my understanding that if you shoot at 80 (or 100 or 125
That, or they just think the film is overrated, and a bit more exposure is needed to
get adequate shadow detail.
tv
On 28 Mar 2002 at 18:21, Len Paris wrote:
It's just sage advise given by someone who believes that their
way of seeing is the only way to see.
Len
---
- Original
---
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
That, or they just think the film is overrated, and a bit more
exposure is needed to get adequate shadow detail.
tv
On 28 Mar 2002
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
That, or they just think the film is overrated, and a bit more exposure is
needed to get adequate shadow detail.
tv
On 28 Mar 2002
Local dealer gave me a roll, which I used in fieldwork here in New
Mexico. Lovely blue skies, but contrast and landscape distinctions were
so muted that I consider it unsuitable for landscape work (at least in
places where the landscape is primarily brown). Probably good for
people. YMMV.
Joe
-
the best
prints or slides.
My original comment was based upon someone outside the chain
telling you what ISO you should use.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Any experience
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
It's just sage advise given by someone who believes that their
way of seeing is the only way to see.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Frits J. Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:05 PM
I've been using sunny f16 for years with
color negative film except I cheat and
open up (overexpose) a half stop. GREAT
results in bright sun. Call it sunny
f13.5??
For slides I usually use sunny f16 and
and shoot at f16 and at f19 (underexpose)
on critical shots. i.e. bracket. I never
- Original Message -
From: David Chang-Sang
Subject: RE: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
All of this stuff will definitely depend on how/where you get
your film
processed and printed. As Tom said in this thread,
the lab will or should be able to give further insight as to
how
use or go to any
other WalMart.
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
- Original Message -
From
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
Jerry,
It's my understanding that if you shoot at 80 (or 100 or 125) and
you drop it into the lab, and not say boo to them about what
you shot
,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
- Original Message -
From: David Chang-Sang
Subject: RE
- Original Message -
From: David Chang-Sang
Subject: RE: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
I'm not so sure William.
The camera that I used is a contax G2 (yes.. yes.. I know..
Pentax list..
I've got a K1000), with the 45mm Zeiss Planar lens :) But I
do suspect that
my particular
Rating 160 speed portrait film started long ago with Kodak Vericolor (VPS) a
film with so little underexposure latitude that the shadows to the lower
mid-tones would go muddy. So people started rating it at 125, or 100, or
even 80 to get rid of the muddies. Yes it did increase contrast SLIGHTLY,
-
From: David Chang-Sang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:07 PM
Subject: RE: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
I'm not so sure William.
The camera that I used is a contax G2 (yes.. yes.. I know.. Pentax list..
I've got a K1000), with the 45mm Zeiss Planar
25 matches
Mail list logo
