The differences are sometimes subtle, and sometime more
obvious. Use the color picker to see the differences that
may be lost by monitor calibration, room light/reflections,
and the vagaries of our vision.
Butch Black wrote:
>
> If I choose to ignore colour space,what is happening then.?
>
> Da
On Apr 2, 2004, at 19:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it's best then if you can have the camera color space set to the
same
color space as PS?
It's probably easiest that way. If you have to convert then you
probably won't notice any loss of quality, as long as you specify the
correct colour sp
y while you are
working.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: Ignoring:PS colour -3 choices ?
> So it's best then if you can have the camera color space set to the same
>
2, 2004 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: Ignoring:PS colour -3 choices ?
So it's best then if you can have the camera color space set to the same
color space as PS? And would sRBG on a camera be the same as sRBG in a
Photoshop?
(Hope that's the right color space acronym.) Is it standardized enough
gt; From: Otis Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 April 2004 14:47
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Ignoring:PS colour -3 choices ?
>
>
> Are there any good detailed reference texts on color management that
> you would recommend.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
Color management is supposed to help manage different devices, if the
color spaces of your scanner, monitor and printer
have the "same" calibrated color space what you see on your monitor will
closely approximate what comes out of the printer.
Butch Black wrote:
If I choose to ignore colour sp
6 matches
Mail list logo
