Hi,
I just asked about K adaptall, I am going to buy KA one!! for my Tamron 90/2.8.
So you use your without any problems on ZX5 and MZS but you wrote that there can be
jamming problems (when you mentions Pz-1p). So I hope I can safely use it on my Pz-1
and maybe in future on MZS or ZX-L for
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:30:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you use your without any problems on ZX5 and MZS but you
wrote that there can be jamming problems [...]
I didn't write anything about jamming problems, since I haven't had any
with the Adaptall lenses on K-1000, LX, ZX-5, and
So you use safely KA adaptall with new bodies? Is it this one for sure?What about
metering, like A lenses?
Alek
Uytkownik Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:19:34 -0500, Jeff wrote:
Maybe other members can shed some light into the Adaptall compatibility with
the AF
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:38:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you use safely KA adaptall with new bodies? Is it this one for sure?What about
metering, like A lenses?
I have the K Adaptall, not the KA. It works fine on my two newer
bodies. No jamming. Meters as if it were a K or an M lens
Hi,
Sorry, so you use K adaptall with new bodies without problems. I think about KA ones.
Alek
Uytkownik Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:38:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you use safely KA adaptall with new bodies? Is it this one for sure?What about
Doug, is yours the K or KA version?
Jeff.
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:19:34 -0500, Jeff wrote:
Maybe other members can shed
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:04:52 -0500, Jeff wrote:
Doug, is yours [Tamron SP 90/2.5] the K or KA version?
It's the K version, now that you mention it.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
I also have some manual lesnes:105/2.8, K135/2.5-not Takumar, K28/3.5 etc and I bought
Tamron SP macro 90/2.8 also manual version and plan to buy adaptall for my cameras and
wonder if it fixes for newer ones.But if it is good for PZ-1 it also should work with
newer bodies I hope.
Manual lenses
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
I also have some manual lesnes:105/2.8, K135/2.5-not Takumar, K28/3.5 etc
and I bought Tamron SP macro 90/2.8 also manual version
: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
I also have some manual lesnes:105/2.8, K135/2.5-not Takumar, K28/3.5 etc
and I bought Tamron SP macro 90/2.8 also manual version and plan to buy
adaptall for my cameras and wonder if it fixes for newer ones.But
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
And you use KA adaptall with your manual bodies?I prefer tamron 2.8 since
it gives 1:1.What about quality of the lens?
Alek
I am
11 matches
Mail list logo
