Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Derby Chang
I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5 Fuji RVP "custom made for Kenny" vs D200 shots KENNY WARNING - do not click on this link if you have any form of kenny-allergy. You will break out in livi

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Derby Chang" Subject: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5 Fu

RE: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Tim Øsleby
illiam Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14. mars 2006 13:27 > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital > comparison > > > - Original Message - > From: "Derby Chang" > Subject: Really Real

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Charles Robinson
On Mar 14, 2006, at 3:41, Derby Chang wrote: I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5 Fuji RVP "custom made for Kenny" vs D200 shots KENNY WARNING - do not click on this link if you have any f

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Bruce Dayton
erestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds TØ> (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) >> -Original Message- >> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 14. mars 2006 13:27 >> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net >> Subject: Re

RE: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Tim Øsleby
ty in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -Original Message- > From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14. mars 2006 17:39 > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film t

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Christian
Aaron Reynolds wrote: On Mar 14, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Christian wrote: At the risk of being flamed He DOES have some nice pictures there... Sure, but his premise and conclusions are odd -- since he didn't buy/bring the correct 4x5 camera for the style of shooting he wanted to do (run '

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Christian
Derby Chang wrote: I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5 Fuji RVP "custom made for Kenny" vs D200 shots KENNY WARNING - do not click on this link if you have any form of kenny-allergy. You wi

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Aaron Reynolds
On Mar 14, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Christian wrote: At the risk of being flamed He DOES have some nice pictures there... Sure, but his premise and conclusions are odd -- since he didn't buy/bring the correct 4x5 camera for the style of shooting he wanted to do (run 'n' gun, apparently), 4x5

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Aaron Reynolds
On Mar 14, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote: The downer for medium format is, according to him, that this quality does not help if the tool is the back of the car when you are on top of a mountain. Didn't he mention leaving it in the car because his wife was waiting for one shot, and not

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Jack Davis
This debate simply matters to too few people. A 35mm comparison would, of course, be of greater general interest. Jack --- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 14, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote: > > > The downer for medium format is, according to him, that this > quality

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Bingo! Shel > [Original Message] > From: Jack Davis > [...] A 35mm comparison would, > of course, be of greater general interest.

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread Fernando Terrazzino
I rather stick with this guy essays: http://www.prime-junta.net/pont/Pontification/e_Film_versus_digital/a_Film_vs_digital.html On 3/14/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bingo! > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Jack Davis > > > [...] A 35mm comparison would, > > of cou

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-14 Thread E.R.N. Reed
Christian wrote: Derby Chang wrote: I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5 Fuji RVP "custom made for Kenny" vs D200 shots KENNY WARNING - do not click on this link if you have any form of k

Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital comparison

2006-03-15 Thread Christian
E.R.N. Reed wrote: Christian wrote: http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d200/d200-vs-4x5.htm Needless to add...this is highly :) At the risk of being flamed He DOES have some nice pictures there... I agree with you. Wonder whose they are? HAR! -- Christian http://photography.skofte