I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I
really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5 Fuji
RVP "custom made for Kenny" vs D200 shots
KENNY WARNING - do not click on this link if you have any form of
kenny-allergy. You will break out in livi
- Original Message -
From: "Derby Chang"
Subject: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital
comparison
I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I
really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5 Fu
illiam Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14. mars 2006 13:27
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film to digital
> comparison
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Derby Chang"
> Subject: Really Real
On Mar 14, 2006, at 3:41, Derby Chang wrote:
I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But
I really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of
4x5 Fuji RVP "custom made for Kenny" vs D200 shots
KENNY WARNING - do not click on this link if you have any f
erestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
TØ> (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
>> -Original Message-
>> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 14. mars 2006 13:27
>> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>> Subject: Re
ty in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14. mars 2006 17:39
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Really Really OT: Hooray, finally, balanced film t
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Mar 14, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Christian wrote:
At the risk of being flamed He DOES have some nice pictures there...
Sure, but his premise and conclusions are odd -- since he didn't
buy/bring the correct 4x5 camera for the style of shooting he wanted to
do (run '
Derby Chang wrote:
I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I
really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5 Fuji
RVP "custom made for Kenny" vs D200 shots
KENNY WARNING - do not click on this link if you have any form of
kenny-allergy. You wi
On Mar 14, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Christian wrote:
At the risk of being flamed He DOES have some nice pictures
there...
Sure, but his premise and conclusions are odd -- since he didn't
buy/bring the correct 4x5 camera for the style of shooting he wanted to
do (run 'n' gun, apparently), 4x5
On Mar 14, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
The downer for medium format is, according to him, that this quality
does
not help if the tool is the back of the car when you are on top of a
mountain.
Didn't he mention leaving it in the car because his wife was waiting
for one shot, and not
This debate simply matters to too few people. A 35mm comparison would,
of course, be of greater general interest.
Jack
--- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 14, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
>
> > The downer for medium format is, according to him, that this
> quality
Bingo!
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Jack Davis
> [...] A 35mm comparison would,
> of course, be of greater general interest.
I rather stick with this guy essays:
http://www.prime-junta.net/pont/Pontification/e_Film_versus_digital/a_Film_vs_digital.html
On 3/14/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bingo!
>
> Shel
>
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Jack Davis
>
> > [...] A 35mm comparison would,
> > of cou
Christian wrote:
Derby Chang wrote:
I'm sorry to cause potential mental harm to my beloved PDMLers. But I
really laughed out loud when I read this. A few blank frames of 4x5
Fuji RVP "custom made for Kenny" vs D200 shots
KENNY WARNING - do not click on this link if you have any form of
k
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Christian wrote:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d200/d200-vs-4x5.htm
Needless to add...this is highly :)
At the risk of being flamed He DOES have some nice pictures there...
I agree with you.
Wonder whose they are?
HAR!
--
Christian
http://photography.skofte
15 matches
Mail list logo