More enjoyable than my wife, and less obnoxious than 98% of the posts
here lately.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's all right Lasse, I thought it was pretty funny
Cheers
Shaun
Lasse,
This is why I use my Nikon stuff for anything important. You are welcome to try out what ever you would like with my Pentax stuff.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John M. wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussi
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
> John M. wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > >If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would
> go
> > >talk to my wife.
> > >
> > >BR
I refrained from replying to Bruce to ask him if I could supply the name
of a good divorc
liams
> >http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
> >Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
> >Updated: March 30, 2002
> >
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Arnold Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
a
mailing list administrator before you can become a member of this
mailing list.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Amita Guha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 10:57 PM
Subject: RE: Shit
bruary 02, 2003 5:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Shit, Crap & Politics...
>
>
> Can we talk about Pentax cameras over there? How about
> digital? Guns? Women? Men? Or are they going to tell us to
> shut up and go someplace else, just like here?
gt; Sent: February 2, 2003 3:06 PM
> Subject: Re: OT Pentax wife (Was: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car
> shit,not politics, not Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that
> isallowed without rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
>
> >
> >
> > John Poir
From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: February 2, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: OT Pentax wife (Was: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car
shit,not politics, not Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that
isallowed without rancor. WAS
William, you started this, If I were you I'd just fold my tent and let this
thread and all related threads die the ignominious deaths they deserve.
At 12:28 PM 2/1/2003 -0600, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Archer"
Subject: Shit, Crap & Politi
ad these list messages? Are you?
keith whaley
> - Original Message -
> From: "Lasse Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: February 2, 2003 2:39 PM
> Subject: OT Pentax wife (Was: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car sh
ore "jokes" along the same
lines inn the future.
Lasse
- Original Message -
From: "John Poirier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: OT Pentax wife (Was: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs:
car shit
Get you're facts straight. But don't do it here. I could point out ever
incorrect fact but I wouldn't have any fun. I've already insulted some
people I like on this list, and I refuse to apologize because they should
know better. If you wish to excuse everything that some tin-pot
dictatoria
PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: February 2, 2003 2:39 PM
Subject: OT Pentax wife (Was: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit,
not politics, not Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is
allowed without rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
>
> Yeah,
John M. wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would
go
> >talk to my wife.
> >
> >BR
> >
> Geez, BR, you need to get a Pentax wife. Sweet, amenable, easy to
get
> along with - and not too expensive. Not as fast as o
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
>If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would go
>talk to my wife.
>
>BR
>
Geez, BR, you need to get a Pentax wife. Sweet, amenable, easy to get
along with - and not too expensive. Not as fast as other brands,
maybe, but darn eas
No thanks. I don't like talking politics. I'd rather talk cameras!
keith
Amita Guha wrote:
>
> I'll say it again, guys. Come on over to the wwwac-politics list. You
> can discuss anything you want ad nauseum over there.
>
> http://email.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=politics
At 10:28 AM +01002/2/03, Arnold Stark wrote, or at least typed:
>Hello Doug,
>
>>I'm not inconsistent. My position has been and will continue to be that politics has
>no place here on the PDML.
>>
>Would you say the same if we had PDML members in Bagdad?
I do not keep up with where members li
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit, not politics, not
Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is allowed without
rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
> People used to wonde
People used to wonder if Pentax monitored this list or not. Maybe the right question
should be - why should they?
Pat Temmerman
[MZ3_fella]
___
GO.com Mail
Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com
I'll say it again, guys. Come on over to the wwwac-politics list. You
can discuss anything you want ad nauseum over there.
http://email.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=politics
Amita
Me too. I just wanted to change the Subject line.
keith
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
>
> If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would go
> talk to my wife.
>
> BR
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
> >arguments somep
Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit, not politics, not
Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is allowed without
rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would go
talk to my wife.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
arguments someplace else... Thanks.
Fred
Doug wrote:
> Read my post again. It's a complaint that that kind of incendiary trolling has no
>place on the PDML. If I want a reminder >that many people don't like America or
>Americans, I have plenty other places to find it.
I do agree that this has nothing to do on this list. However, I do
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
arguments someplace else... Thanks.
Fred
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit, not politics, not
Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is allowed without
rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
> Hello Doug,
>
> &g
This one time, at band camp,
Arnold Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This war will have effects on all of us
What 'war'?
America will blow the place to rubble with thier weapons
of mass destruction and then 'find' some weapons cache
and say 'we yall told ya so'.
No one will be killed because t
> 2) The quick criticism that is offered the policeman, but the lack of
> appreciation and thanks that is given for the benefits others enjoy from
> living in a civilized society. (Why is this? Are you all so shallow that
> you don't recognize that you live under the protection of the police
we at least put in the subject 'politics', so I can filter these messages
out? That would prevent me from leaving this otherwise great list.
Frits Wüthrich
Pentaxianado
On Saturday 01 February 2003 19:11, Ed Matthew wrote:
> >- Original Message -
>
> From: "Ken
Bill was a gracious Canadian on 9/11 and expressed his sympathies to those of
us in the USA.
As the USA approaches war with Sadam, I see peoples around the world seek
ways to avoid the conflict and condemn the USA for threatening to police the
world.
At these times, I cannot help but reflect
I'd like to thank you, Bill, for your reminder that all Americans are evil and deserve
all the tragedies that come our way. I'd especially like to thank you for reminding us
here on the Pentax list, where we are supposed to celebrate our commonality as people
and photographers no matter our nati
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Archer"
Subject: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit, not politics, not
Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is allowed without
rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
> Here we go again. These subjects have no
Here we go again. These subjects have no place on the PDML. Take them
off list or flush them where they belong.
On Saturday 01 February 2003 03:43 pm, Raimo Korhonen wrote:
> To raise gasoline prices for 10 cents. Oil companies and producers
> can line their pockets comfortably. And GWB is an o
33 matches
Mail list logo
