2008/5/8 Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Of these I like
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2361/2264457467_3715e407a7_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2070/1873614000_eb7bcffdb4_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2391/2105976158_f5943358b8_o.jpg
Thank you all for your feedbacks!
I bought the Pentax 12-24 f4 one... and already in love with the lens :D
I think I will have to buy a new cam for the other lenses because I am not
willing to take it off from the camera! :D :D :D
Cheers,
.timber
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On May 8, 2008, at 6:21 AM, David Savage wrote:
By less challenging, I mean you don't have to worry about the FE
perspective.
You have to worry about the rectilinear perspective ... keystoning,
wide angle smearing, foreground-background size exaggeration have
just as big an influence,
On May 8, 2008, at 9:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you all for your feedbacks!
I bought the Pentax 12-24 f4 one... and already in love with the
lens :D
I think I will have to buy a new cam for the other lenses because I
am not
willing to take it off from the camera! :D :D :D
=6372564
Large version:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6372564size=lg
Regards,
John
On Tue, 06 May 2008 23:45:02 +0200, Timber wrote
Hi list!
I am planning to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10-17 Fisheye
I have the Sigma in Nikon mount.
Not much use, but i like what it has given me so far.
Dave
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Timber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list!
I am planning to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10-17
to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10-17 Fisheye)
As the price the Pentax 12-24 is almost 2 times as the Sigma 10-20 but
as I read the reviews both are good lens. Actually I am wondering
if the
Pentax one worths it's
Timber wrote:
I am planning to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10-17 Fisheye)
Hmm, I'm pondering the same choice myself. I don't have any experience
with either lens.
I've had nothing but excellent experiences with the Sigma
Hi Mark
Did you at sometime own the Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-4?
Regards,
John
On Wed, 07 May 2008 09:07:19 -0400, Mark Roberts wrote
Timber wrote:
I am planning to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10-17 Fisheye)
Hmm, I'm
John Whittingham wrote:
Hi Mark
Did you at sometime own the Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-4?
Yes I did. I sold it when I bought the Pentax 16-50/2.8 but I always
found the Tamron to be a wonderful lens. Highly recommended. They
stopped making it in Pentax mount, at least for a while.
--
PDML
Thanks Mark
Good to know you have a positive impression, I've been offered one at
reasonable cost and I'm trying to make a decision. It would make a good wide
to normal zoom FL wise.
Regards,
John
On Wed, 07 May 2008 09:36:56 -0400, Mark Roberts wrote
John Whittingham wrote:
Hi Mark
John Whittingham wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2008 09:36:56 -0400, Mark Roberts wrote
John Whittingham wrote:
Did you at sometime own the Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-4?
Yes I did. I sold it when I bought the Pentax 16-50/2.8 but I always
found the Tamron to be a wonderful lens. Highly recommended. They
2008/5/7 Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I always loved its image quality. The main reason I went to the Pentax
16-50 was for the weather sealing, which can be important for the kind
of photography I like most. (How some of my cameras and lenses have
survived downpours on Grandfather
David Savage wrote:
2008/5/7 Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I always loved its image quality. The main reason I went to the Pentax
16-50 was for the weather sealing, which can be important for the kind
of photography I like most. (How some of my cameras and lenses have
survived downpours
Daveyou got a flame proof suit by any chance? 8)
John
On Wed, 7 May 2008 22:37:49 +0800, David Savage wrote
2008/5/7 Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I always loved its image quality. The main reason I went to the Pentax
16-50 was for the weather sealing, which can be important
To me it suggests that the whole weather sealing thing may be a bit of
a sales gimmick.
Cheers,
Dave
On lens? I think yes. On body? Sure not :D
I've used K10D/K20D in rain, snow, dust etc.
Once I was with a group of photographers in a big snowfall. Line up was: 5
Canon EOS 350D/400D, 1
I dare you to test that hypothesis on your own gear!
I know I wouldn't submit non-sealed equipment to what I've put my K10D
and 16-50/2.8 through! (With the ist-D and non-sealed lenses I at least
tried to protect my gear in the rain, with the K10D and 16-50 I just let
it all hang out.)
Use
David Savage wrote:
2008/5/7 Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Savage wrote:
2008/5/7 Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I always loved its image quality. The main reason I went to the Pentax
16-50 was for the weather sealing, which can be important for the kind
of photography I
2008/5/7 Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Savage wrote:
2008/5/7 Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I always loved its image quality. The main reason I went to the Pentax
16-50 was for the weather sealing, which can be important for the kind
of photography I like most. (How some
Of these I like
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2361/2264457467_3715e407a7_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2070/1873614000_eb7bcffdb4_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2391/2105976158_f5943358b8_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1207/1156628029_59615df340_o.jpg
I don't know that a
with the K10D and 16-50 I just let it all hang out.)
Way, way, way, too much information...
Mark Roberts wrote:
David Savage wrote:
2008/5/7 Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I always loved its image quality. The main reason I went to the Pentax
16-50 was for the weather sealing,
Hi list!
I am planning to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10-17 Fisheye)
As the price the Pentax 12-24 is almost 2 times as the Sigma 10-20 but
as I read the reviews both are good lens. Actually I am wondering if the
Pentax one
Sigma lens quality is extremely variable. For that reason I stick
with Pentax lenses, which have been less likely to have problems
right out of the box.
G
On May 6, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Timber wrote:
Hi list!
I am planning to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20
Timber, there was just a thread on this topic on April 22 - 23 if you
check the archives. :)
Amita
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Timber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list!
I am planning to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10
: Sigma 10-20 vs Pentax 12-24
Hi list!
I am planning to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10-17 Fisheye)
As the price the Pentax 12-24 is almost 2 times as the Sigma 10-20 but
as I read the reviews both are good lens. Actually I am
Of
Timber
Sent: 06 May 2008 22:45
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Sigma 10-20 vs Pentax 12-24
Hi list!
I am planning to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10-17 Fisheye)
As the price the Pentax 12-24 is almost 2 times
the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10-17
Fisheye)
As the price the Pentax 12-24 is almost 2 times as
the Sigma 10-20 but
as I read the reviews both are good lens. Actually I
am wondering if the
Pentax one worths it's price compared to the Sigma
one or should I go
correct in post, but you'll sacrifice image
quality. Every time you move a pixel you lose something.
Paul
On May 6, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Timber wrote:
Hi list!
I am planning to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10-17 Fisheye
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Timber
Sent: 06 May 2008 22:45
Hi list!
I am planning to buy a WIDE angle lens. I am hesitating between the
Sigma 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 (maybe Pentax 10-17 Fisheye)
As the price the Pentax 12-24 is almost 2 times as the Sigma 10
Peter Loveday wrote on 01.03.05 0:04:
Anyone heard anything about the availability (and price?) of the Sigma 30 /
1.4 prime for Pentax mount?
Yeah, that would be even more interesting for bright standard lovers.
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
FYI
The Sigma 10-20 F4-5.6 zoom will be available in non HSM mount for Pentax
after it's available for Canon, Nikon and Sigma mounts. This is directly
from Sigma in response to my e-mail to them. They did not say when, but I'm
guessing mid summer for Pentax.
I'm going to get this laens as well
The Sigma 10-20 F4-5.6 zoom will be available in non HSM mount for Pentax
after it's available for Canon, Nikon and Sigma mounts. This is directly
from Sigma in response to my e-mail to them. They did not say when, but
I'm
guessing mid summer for Pentax.
Cool.
Anyone heard anything about the
32 matches
Mail list logo
