- Original Message -
From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:07 AM
Subject: RE: Opinions wanted: Sigma 24/2.8 super wide II
I would second this. I researched this lens because I was
seriously
considering it s
Hi!
I think you've convinced me. I am passing this one on. Unless of
course just a few shots I've made with it come out astoundingly good.
Then I will have to reconsider. But being able to see the distortion
in the viewfinder of my ME Super makes me think that above possibility
is rather remote.
Subject: RE: Opinions wanted: Sigma 24/2.8 super wide II
> I would second this. I researched this lens because I was seriously
> considering it second hand. The build of these lenses is 'precarious'
> shall we say, and I would not be keen to buy one which has been dropped
&g
t;
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Opinions wanted: Sigma 24/2.8 super wide II
> Hi!
>
> I am given the opportunity to buy this lens for about $100 (in local
> currency ).
>
> It goes as follows:
> 1. I'd get circular polarizer and UV filter and also a h
Hi!
I am given the opportunity to buy this lens for about $100 (in local
currency ).
It goes as follows:
1. I'd get circular polarizer and UV filter and also a hood for this
lens.
2. The lens is K-mount with AF that works very find with MZ-5n that I
could handle yesterday.
Unfortunately the prev
Hi,
I recieved my Sigma EX 24mm/1.8 just today. I can't comment on the optical
quality yet (other than no distortion visible), but the mechanical side
could be better. Focusing from 18cm to infinity in a quarter of a twist
takes getting used to since I use only manual focusing gear. The focus i
Alan Chan wrote:
>
> I had these Sigma 24mm and 28mm few years back, both
manual focus.
> Optically, both are great imho. However, both suffers from
flare problem and
> substandard mechanical design, particularly the aperture
ring assembly. The
> 24mm even had worse rubber, aperture ring material a
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: Sigma 24/2.8 Super Wide II
> >Anybody has this lens? How good/bad is it? I'm tempted by the 24 mm, but
> >I'm not sure about the quality. How is the manual focus? I'm thi
Anybody has this lens? How good/bad is it? I'm tempted by the 24 mm, but
I'm not sure about the quality. How is the manual focus? I'm thinking
about buying either this Sigma or a FA 28/2.8 AL. Is the Pentax lens
significantly better?
I had these Sigma 24mm and 28mm few years back, both manual
Hi there,
Anybody has this lens? How good/bad is it? I'm tempted by the 24 mm, but I'm
not sure about the quality. How is the manual focus?
I'm thinking about buying either this Sigma or a FA 28/2.8 AL. Is the Pentax
lens significantly better?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Łukasz
===
10 matches
Mail list logo
