From: Larry Colen
On Oct 17, 2012, at 5:40 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
Knowing Godfrey's love of Sigma, here's a shot that I'm sure he'll love:
http://500px.com/photo/3613140
That's as much Photoshop as photography but it's still a great image!
You're probably right, I gue
On Oct 17, 2012, at 5:40 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Larry Colen wrote:
>
>> Knowing Godfrey's love of Sigma, here's a shot that I'm sure he'll love:
>>
>> http://500px.com/photo/3613140
>
> That's as much Photoshop as photography but it's still a great image!
You're probably right, I guess it'
Larry Colen wrote:
>Knowing Godfrey's love of Sigma, here's a shot that I'm sure he'll love:
>
>http://500px.com/photo/3613140
That's as much Photoshop as photography but it's still a great image!
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
That's a good one. The shot, that is. The lens isn't even 2.8.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> Knowing Godfrey's love of Sigma, here's a shot that I'm sure he'll love:
>
> http://500px.com/photo/3613140
>
> --
> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
Knowing Godfrey's love of Sigma, here's a shot that I'm sure he'll love:
http://500px.com/photo/3613140
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit th
Hi!
I am still offering for sale the following items:
SMCP F 17-28/3.5-4.5 Fish Eye
Sigma 18/3.5 in KA mount
SMCP FA 28-105/4-5.6 IF
SMCP FA 80-320/4.5-5.6
and I am also selling this:
SMCP FA 50/1.7
If you're interested in any of these lenses, please contact me off-list.
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDM
uot;Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:04:36 +0100
Subject: Re: Sigma Lens - Was "which camera to buy?"
> Yes. With the 4-element Tamron 1.4X image iso not bad at center but
> becomes noticeably softer at the very edges (on the D),
converter you have to overexpose 1/3-1/2 stop to get a proper exposure.
I haven't tried 2X converters.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: Sigma Lens - Was "which camer
nd 70-80mm, the Sigma is still excellent, but the FA* is undoubtably
> better (lower CA and higher res).
>
> Dario
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Derek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:35 PM
> Subject: Sigma Lens
> I own the 70-200/2.8 EX (not DG) and it's a gem. Both build quality
> and optical performance are at the top. You can use it wide open at
> 200mm with no worry (which was not the case with any other zoom lens
> in this range I used before the Sigma).
That's reasuring, I can vouch for the buil
e Sigma is still excellent, but the FA* is undoubtably
better (lower CA and higher res).
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Derek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:35 PM
Subject: Sigma Lens - Was "which camera to buy?"
Speaking o
Speaking of Sigma lenses, has anyone owned and used the Sigma 24-70/2.8
or the 70-200/2.8?
Thanks,
Derek
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I owned one Sigma lens, the 17-35. It was
The Pentax 2x rear converter and Sigma 50mm 2.8 macro also give strange
readings on the DS. The max aperture goes to 1.4 (guess that's why the
converter is worth over $300 :)
Although the displayed info is screwy the actual exposers seem OK and you
can get really super close macro with this combi
Thanks, Mark (and Kostas too).
It's good to know that it's not just my items that are faulty, even if
it doesn't solve the issue...:-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Cassino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 12:57 AM
o, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 5:46 AM
Subject: Sigma lens oddity
A couple of days ago I experimented with the AF 1.7TC, the autofocus
teleconverter, on the *istD. My Penta
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Jostein wrote:
> A couple of days ago I experimented with the AF 1.7TC, the autofocus
> teleconverter, on the *istD. My Pentax lenses worked fine, but my
> Sigma EX 70-200/2.8 did not work well with the TC. On full opening,
> Anyone else had the same experiences?
No, cause
A couple of days ago I experimented with the AF 1.7TC, the autofocus
teleconverter, on the *istD. My Pentax lenses worked fine, but my
Sigma EX 70-200/2.8 did not work well with the TC. On full opening,
the aperture reported was f/2.8. When stopped down, however, I could
select f/40. That's 2/3
- Original Message -
From: "MikeM"
Subject: Repairing Sigma lens
A couple of plastic flanges that lock a lens into the MZ50 body broke off
my
Sigma 100-300 lens. Is it possible to replace the plastic part that these
flanges on?
Yup.
Send it in.
William Robb
A couple of plastic flanges that lock a lens into the MZ50 body broke off my
Sigma 100-300 lens. Is it possible to replace the plastic part that these
flanges on?
Thanks
Mike
on 21.07.04 2:33, Joseph Tainter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd sure want to see a lens test on this before I bought one. I'll bet
> it won't perform as well as the DA 16-45.
So far Sigmas from DC series got quite favourable reviews and so far they
were only cheapo versions (18-55/3.5-5.6 is 4x
I'd sure want to see a lens test on this before I bought one. I'll bet
it won't perform as well as the DA 16-45.
OTOH, it may be less expensive, and more importantly, you may actually
be able to buy one.
Joe
"Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does it work with film cameras?
They're marketing it for *all* digital cameras and they specifically
mention the 1Ds and DCS-14n full-frame cameras so it would seem the
answer is yes.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/news/24_60.html
>Seems like a very nice and bright wide-angle option, good addition
>to 12-24 lens and DSLR with APS-sized CCD! And it takes smaller (77mm) filters than
>older 24-70 (82mm)
Looks nice. And it's f
> I recently purchased a Z-1
>
> I have used two Sigma lens on it
> The camrea sometimes decides these lenses are f1.2 (24-70 f3.5-5.6/28-90
> f3.5-5.6)and wont focus.
> I have also used Pentax current 50mm f1.4 and an old Pentax F 28-80 with no
> problems.
>
> Do I h
Paul Nylund a écrit:
I recently purchased a Z-1
I have used two Sigma lens on it
The camrea sometimes decides these lenses are f1.2 (24-70 f3.5-5.6/28-90
f3.5-5.6)and wont focus.
I have also used Pentax current 50mm f1.4 and an old Pentax F 28-80 with no
problems.
Do I have a compatibility
I recently purchased a Z-1
I have used two Sigma lens on it
The camrea sometimes decides these lenses are f1.2 (24-70 f3.5-5.6/28-90
f3.5-5.6)and wont focus.
I have also used Pentax current 50mm f1.4 and an old Pentax F 28-80 with no
problems.
Do I have a compatibility problem or a camera
guarantees on
this though).
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Dipert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 1:40 AM
Subject: Advice: Sigma lens on *ist D
> In preparing for t
Brian Dipert a écrit:
In preparing for the sooner-or-later retail channel stocking of the *ist D,
followed closely (likely) by my purchase of it, I'm trying to figure out if
the body alone will suffice or if I should purchase it in conjunction with
the 18-35mm zoom. I already own a Sigma 21-35mm f3
In preparing for the sooner-or-later retail channel stocking of the *ist D,
followed closely (likely) by my purchase of it, I'm trying to figure out if
the body alone will suffice or if I should purchase it in conjunction with
the 18-35mm zoom. I already own a Sigma 21-35mm f3.5-4.2 with 77mm filte
- Original Message -
From: "Frankie Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>It would be great if the IS function is also valid for Pentax manual
body.
Frankie,
I believe the IS function will need help from an IS enabled body to
work. At least for power supply...
Jostein
I visited a camera exhibition show two days ago. When I walked to the Sigma area, I
have chance to play some of the high-end lenses. What impressed me came from two new
products which not yet released in Hong Kong market. They are 135-300mm f2.8 HSM and
80-400mm f4.5-5.6 with IS function. If the
>Does anybody know if there is a compatablidy issue with a Sigma 24/2.8
>Super wide angle II with PZ-1 or PZ-1P. I have an opportunity to pick one
>up very cheaply and I want it to work with my new to me Z-5
I had the MF version which was excellent optically - sharpness and colour.
However, b
Does anybody know if there is a compatablidy issue with a Sigma 24/2.8 Super wide
angle II with PZ-1 or PZ-1P. I have an opportunity to pick one up very cheaply and I
want it to work with my new to me Z-5
Jim Fellows
Manufacturing Manager
Prentice Hall School
Phone: 781-455-1306
Fax: 781-455-1
: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:49:02
-0700From: "Richard S. Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SuperProgram Sigma lens
(in)compatability?Hello everyone,I just picked up a Sigma
135-400/4-5.6 zoom and find that it does notgive correct aperture
information in Program and Shutter Priority mod
34 matches
Mail list logo
