On 7/29/2010 6:09 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
What I was saying was not so much a series of statements leading to a
conclusion as a summary of my use and insight into using scanners.
Information, discussion perhaps, not really argument in this literal
sense.
Argument, when used in the context
: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Doug
Franklin
Sent: Wednesday, 28 July 2010 10:31 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Slide copier for Pentax
On 2010-07-28 5:41, Boris Liberman wrote:
I used argument as a synonym to reasoning... In no way did I imply
From: Brian Walters
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:10 -0400, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:30 -0400, Doug Franklin
many Americans would use the word discussion, or maybe something else. At
least in the US, the word argument has overtones
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:24 -0400, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
wrote:
From: Brian Walters
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:10 -0400, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:30 -0400, Doug Franklin
many Americans would use the word
Brian Walters wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:30 -0400, Doug Franklin
jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
On 2010-07-28 5:41, Boris Liberman wrote:
I used argument as a synonym to reasoning... In no way did I imply
an argument as in: a reason given in proof or rebuttal or in
discourse
On Jul 29, 2010, at 8:08, Toralf Lund wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:30 -0400, Doug Franklin
jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
On 2010-07-28 5:41, Boris Liberman wrote:
I used argument as a synonym to reasoning... In no way did I imply
an argument as in: a
What I was saying was not so much a series of statements leading to a
conclusion as a summary of my use and insight into using scanners.
Information, discussion perhaps, not really argument in this literal
sense.
Argument, when used in the context of talking about a discussion,
nearly always
On 7/27/2010 8:16 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I didn't think it was an argument, Boris. Just information.
From Merriam Webster on the web:
argument: a coherent series of statements leading from a premise to a
conclusion.
I used argument as a synonym to reasoning... In no way did I imply
On 2010-07-28 5:41, Boris Liberman wrote:
I used argument as a synonym to reasoning... In no way did I imply
an argument as in: a reason given in proof or rebuttal or in
discourse intended to persuade. All quotes of course are from the same
Merriam Webster page.
The more English language I
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:30 -0400, Doug Franklin
jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
On 2010-07-28 5:41, Boris Liberman wrote:
I used argument as a synonym to reasoning... In no way did I imply
an argument as in: a reason given in proof or rebuttal or in
discourse intended to persuade. All
Brian Walters wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:30 -0400, Doug Franklin
jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
On 2010-07-28 5:41, Boris Liberman wrote:
(snip)
many Americans would use the word discussion, or maybe something else. At
least in the US, the word argument has overtones of
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:10 -0400, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:30 -0400, Doug Franklin
many Americans would use the word discussion, or maybe something else. At
least in the US, the word argument has overtones of disagreement,
though
On 7/27/2010 4:51 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
However, with today's 10-14 Mpixel DSLRs and a suitable setup, you can
achieve approximately the same image resolution as a 4000 ppi scanner
with better dmax from 35mm film.
To add to Godfrey's good argument here, I am thinking that there are
more
I didn't think it was an argument, Boris. Just information.
- Scanners which have IR-based dust and scratch reduction/removal
features can automate dust removal much more easily than DSLR capture
can, although the spotting tools in LR and the contextual-aware
cloning tools in PS CS5 go a long way
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:34 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I get a RAW file using vuescan on my Epson 3200. Or, I assume, with any other
scanner.
Paul
A VueScan raw file is different from a DSLR raw file. It's essentially
a linear gamma RGB
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
...VueScan raw file is different from a DSLR raw file. ...
You can also write in DNG format these days, though, and feed the file into
standard raw converters. I would assume there isn't much you can't do with
these files
Boris,
If I will buy, I'll definitely share my experience.
It is not the highest priority on my to do list, I just have learned
about that possibility which made me thinking... :-)
.. and I thought I might hear helpful information from others,
while sharing this finding with PDMLers.
And yes,
On Jul 27, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I didn't think it was an argument, Boris. Just information.
Yes. And good information.
- Scanners which have IR-based dust and scratch reduction/removal
features can automate dust removal much more easily than DSLR capture
can, although
On 28/07/2010, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
The .DNG files it outputs are an encapsulation of TIFF RGB files and
are very editable in Camera Raw; they're not actually raw files at
all, simply a TIFF using the ability of DNG to encapsulate them and
provide more functionality.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
...VueScan raw file is different from a DSLR raw file. ...
You can also write in DNG format these days, though, and feed the file into
standard raw converters. I would assume there isn't
I wonder if anybody has used this combination:
http://www.amazon.com/Opteka-Copier-Pentax-Digital-Camera/dp/B0017WCKTE
and
http://www.amazon.com/Slide-Negative-Carrier-Opteka-Copiers/dp/B0011N43H6/
?
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I haven't used those products but presuming the hold the film or slide
flat, and are decent resolution, they should do the job well.
Slides and bw negs are relatively easy to work with but color negs
take some work to invert well due to the crossover masking. I built
custom camera calibration
standard but for digitising family snapshots
they are good and fast.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org
To: PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 6:52 AM
Subject: Slide copier for Pentax
I wonder if anybody has used this combination:
http
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I haven't used those products but presuming the hold the film or slide
flat, and are decent resolution, they should do the job well.
Slides and bw negs are relatively easy to work with but color negs
take some work to invert well due to the crossover masking. I built
://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 7/26/10, Northeast Media northeastme...@bigpond.com wrote:
From: Northeast Media northeastme...@bigpond.com
Subject: Re: Slide copier for Pentax
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 6:37 PM
I have a a similar device
...@bigpond.com
Subject: Re: Slide copier for Pentax
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 6:37 PM
I have a a similar device but not an
Opteka for duplicating slides..
It is reasoanble but my biggest problem is the quality of
my old slides - I guess we all have
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:34 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I get a RAW file using vuescan on my Epson 3200. Or, I assume, with any other
scanner.
Paul
A VueScan raw file is different from a DSLR raw file. It's essentially
a linear gamma RGB TIFF file without VueScan's
On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:34 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
wrote:
I get a RAW file using vuescan on my Epson 3200. Or, I assume, with any
other scanner.
Paul
A VueScan raw file is different from a DSLR raw file. It's
Igor, if you decide to buy one and use it, I'd sure like you to write a
word or two on the list as to how it went...
Boris
On 7/26/2010 11:52 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
I wonder if anybody has used this combination:
http://www.amazon.com/Opteka-Copier-Pentax-Digital-Camera/dp/B0017WCKTE
and
Somewhere from 28~35mm should do it. However none of those are
particularly flat field.
Beaker wrote:
Hi-
Has anyone used a bellows type slide copier on a digital SLR? Or am I
just being silly again?
I'm thinking about getting a roll of BW film and hunting up my old
reels and tank
A Pentax A50/2.8 Macro with a Rear Converter 2x-S attached does a
fine job at delivering the 1.5:1 magnification required and has
excellent flatness of field.
G
On Nov 19, 2007, at 12:42 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Somewhere from 28~35mm should do it. However none of those are
particularly
. (The slight defocus created by the camera's antialiasing
filter can help, however, with minimizing grain aliasing and scratches.)
Godfrey
On Nov 17, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Beaker wrote:
Has anyone used a bellows type slide copier on a digital SLR? Or am I
just being silly again?
I'm thinking about
Hi-
Has anyone used a bellows type slide copier on a digital SLR? Or am
I just being silly again?
Thanks for the response guys. I had an idea that it was something
like a pipe dream as I clicked on send.
It confirms my habit of doing something the hard way first...
Cheers
Beaker
Hi-
Has anyone used a bellows type slide copier on a digital SLR? Or am I
just being silly again?
I'm thinking about getting a roll of BW film and hunting up my old
reels and tank, so I can do BW film on the cheap.
I realize a film scanner is a better way to go about this, but an e-
bay
I tried using my Pentax bellows/slide copier with the ist D, but it does not
clear the front of the camera. I had to use a very small extension tube to be
able to mount it on the body..The K10D might have more space to use the
bellows.Joe
-- Original message
There are at least two ways to do this that are preferable to what
you propose:
One: Shoot BW film and scan it on a good film scanner.
Two: Shoot digital and convert it to BW.
Paul
On Nov 17, 2007, at 10:06 PM, Beaker wrote:
Hi-
Has anyone used a bellows type slide copier on a digital SLR
- Original Message -
From: Beaker
Subject: Slide copier on a DSLR?
Hi-
Has anyone used a bellows type slide copier on a digital SLR? Or am I
just being silly again?
I'm thinking about getting a roll of BW film and hunting up my old
reels and tank, so I can do BW film
-
Has anyone used a bellows type slide copier on a digital SLR? Or am I
just being silly again?
I'm thinking about getting a roll of BW film and hunting up my old
reels and tank, so I can do BW film on the cheap.
I realize a film scanner is a better way to go about this, but an e-
bay slide
Mike, as Bill said, the normal bellows don't have the extension to
allow you to copy the full frame. A few months ago I did see listed
somewhere (BH?) a redesigned bellows/slide copier intended to get
around the problem with digital SLRs. Available for various mounts.
Price was around $250
Beaker wrote:
Hi-
Has anyone used a bellows type slide copier on a digital SLR? Or am I
just being silly again?
I'm thinking about getting a roll of BW film and hunting up my old
reels and tank, so I can do BW film on the cheap.
I realize a film scanner is a better way to go about
Vivitar bellows with Slide Copier. Unfortunately Nikon mount.
The back looks like a T mount, so that's changeable with relative ease.
The front might be a little more work, or just use a Nikon lens and
be done with it.
Pic on request.
$75 + shpg. PayPal preferred.
Collin
KC8TKA
Now that I do not have bellows any more the Slide Copier A needs a good
home. It is free, I would like to get postage, though.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
For Sale:
Beautiful condition Asahi Pentax Auto-Bellows / slide copier with 100mm f4
Bellows takumar lens.
For screwmount. Double cable release, scales and booklet. $150
http://www.beard-redfern.com/photos/102_0271w.jpg
Wendy Beard,
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.beard-redfern.com
43 matches
Mail list logo