All that blood flow being redirected away from the brain has side effects...
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/22/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thinking about girls makes you dumb.
>
>
> Mark Roberts wrote:
> > P. J. Alling wrote:
> >
> >> Paul Sorenson wrote:
> >>> Oops...you're right. But it doe
Thinking about girls makes you dumb.
Mark Roberts wrote:
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>> Paul Sorenson wrote:
>>> Oops...you're right. But it does make you have to do more than just
>>> right click and save. ;>} And you do have to be a little more
> computer
>>> literate to follow through on it.
On 10/21/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> >Paul Sorenson wrote:
> >> Oops...you're right. But it does make you have to do more than just
> >> right click and save. ;>} And you do have to be a little more
> computer
> >> literate to follow through on it..
> >>
Obviously your at an elite university...
Mark Roberts wrote:
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>
>> Paul Sorenson wrote:
>>
>>> Oops...you're right. But it does make you have to do more than just
>>> right click and save. ;>} And you do have to be a little more
>>>
> computer
>
>>> li
P. J. Alling wrote:
>Paul Sorenson wrote:
>> Oops...you're right. But it does make you have to do more than just
>> right click and save. ;>} And you do have to be a little more
computer
>> literate to follow through on it..
>>
>Sadly as computer literate as the average 12 year old.
If that'
Sadly as computer literate as the average 12 year old.
Paul Sorenson wrote:
> Oops...you're right. But it does make you have to do more than just
> right click and save. ;>} And you do have to be a little more computer
> literate to follow through on it..
>
> -p
>
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>>
I;ll try it again.
Dave
On 10/20/07, Paul Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H...I just tried it w/55 6mp images and it took less than a minute.
> The only thing I didn't do was add a watermark, but I can't imagine
> that would add a lot of time to the process.
>
> -p
>
> David J Brooks
Oops...you're right. But it does make you have to do more than just
right click and save. ;>} And you do have to be a little more computer
literate to follow through on it..
-p
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Right click on it in Firefox call up properties and it gives you the
> address of the image.
Right click on it in Firefox call up properties and it gives you the
address of the image. Highlight that copy and paste into the address
location bar and hit enter, and viola, (an oversize violin). you have
the image already for saving to your hard drive.
Paul Sorenson wrote:
> Dave -
>
> Try
H...I just tried it w/55 6mp images and it took less than a minute.
The only thing I didn't do was add a watermark, but I can't imagine
that would add a lot of time to the process.
-p
David J Brooks wrote:
> On 10/20/07, Paul Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The latest version of JA
On 10/20/07, Paul Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The latest version of JAlbum is 7.3. It will resize the images for you
> and the Chameleon skin has a watermark function so all you need to do
> externally is re-name the files.
I tried that on the ibbok version. I dragged about 200 full siz
The latest version of JAlbum is 7.3. It will resize the images for you
and the Chameleon skin has a watermark function so all you need to do
externally is re-name the files.
-p
David J Brooks wrote:
> Himm.
>
> I have a version here on the ibook, but maybe i'll down load on for
> the PC and s
Himm.
I have a version here on the ibook, but maybe i'll down load on for
the PC and see what it does.
I could always use CKRename for rnaming, then irfanview for resize and
water marking, then drag the smaller pictures into jalbum.
Might be worth a try, and a different look for 2008
Dave
On 1
Dave -
Try using JAlbum as your gallery generator - the one Scott is using for
the PUG gallery. Right clicking on the image only gets you the link to
"previous", "index page" or "next image". At least, that's the way it
works w/Firefox 2.0.0.8.
-p
David J Brooks wrote:
> Nope, does not work
Firefox 2.0.0.8
Dave
On 10/19/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David J Brooks"
> Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
>
>
> > Nope, does not work in the BBPro web pages.
&g
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
> Nope, does not work in the BBPro web pages.
>
> I tried it in several locations in the head, and i still get the save
> picture as pop ups.
It sho
Nope, does not work in the BBPro web pages.
I tried it in several locations in the head, and i still get the save
picture as pop ups.
Dave
On 10/13/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave, drop this line into the head of any web page.
>
>
>
> That will do it as best as you can.
>
>
On Oct 16, 2007, at 4:40 AM, David Savage wrote:
> Nonsense. You can never have too many Dave's.
>
> Right, Dave, Dave & Dave?
Yeah, Bruce.
- Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the lin
- Original Message -
From: "Rebekah"
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
> >This will stop the casual web browser. As has been mentioned before,
> >nothing
>>can stop the serious people who are intent on grabbing your conte
>This will stop the casual web browser. As has been mentioned before, nothing
>can stop the serious people who are intent on grabbing your content no
>matter what.
You know, I tried that out of curiosity, and although I couldn't
right-click, the little box that offers me the options to save, print
Nonsense. You can never have too many Dave's.
Right, Dave, Dave & Dave?
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/14/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I felt there were too many Daves involved.
>
>
> David J Brooks wrote:
> > Mr Brooks?? What i di now.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://p
undesirable side effects).
>
> William Robb wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "David J Brooks"
> > Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
> >
> >
> >
> >> Main page or the sub pages Bill.
&g
- Original Message -
From: "David Mann"
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
>
> One of the TV networks here has started doing that with little ads
> during programmes. Damn annoying. It's not so bad with watermarked
> photos t
On Oct 14, 2007, at 3:32 AM, graywolf wrote:
> One thing Mr Brooks could do is put that copyright water mark in
> the most
> annoying place on the photo, like across the rider and horses face,
> along with a
> comment, "To purchase a copy of this photo without this watermark
> call,
> ###-##
That works in IE but not Mozilla, (and it leads, on my machine at least
to undesirable side effects).
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David J Brooks"
> Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
>
>
>
>&g
In a message dated 10/13/2007 9:33:58 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I felt there were too many Daves involved.
=
LOL. Mark!
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.
I felt there were too many Daves involved.
David J Brooks wrote:
> Mr Brooks?? What i di now.
>
> LOL
>
> Yes i think i will change my water mark/copyright statement that is
> there now, to something a bit more annoying.
>
> Dave
>
> On 10/13/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> One thi
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
>
> Yes i think i will change my water mark/copyright statement that is
> there now, to something a bit more annoying.
Just dont become so annoying
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
> Main page or the sub pages Bill.
>
> Some times i feel like changing my water mark from David J Brooks 2007
> to something like,
> If you see
Mr Brooks?? What i di now.
LOL
Yes i think i will change my water mark/copyright statement that is
there now, to something a bit more annoying.
Dave
On 10/13/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing Mr Brooks could do is put that copyright water mark in the most
> annoying place on t
One thing Mr Brooks could do is put that copyright water mark in the most
annoying place on the photo, like across the rider and horses face, along with
a
comment, "To purchase a copy of this photo without this watermark call,
###-###-".
In the old days many photography studios stamped "PR
On Oct 13, 2007, at 1:41 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Main page or the sub pages Bill.
>
> Some times i feel like changing my water mark from David J Brooks 2007
> to something like,
> If you see this any were other than www.caughtinmotion.com please call
> XXX XXX so i can charge appropriatel
TED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David J Brooks"
> Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
>
>
> > Mine are around 23-25 K and 480 by something. I forget what i have
> > BBPro set at but its small.
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
> Mine are around 23-25 K and 480 by something. I forget what i have
> BBPro set at but its small.
You can't stop a person from downloading your imag
100x150 would be better, if you really want them not to download a usable shot
try 40x60.
Cotty wrote:
> On 12/10/07, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Basically, if I can view your image on the screen, I can grab a copy of it.
>> All you can do is make it harder for me.
>
> I'm th
Mine are around 23-25 K and 480 by something. I forget what i have
BBPro set at but its small.
Dave
On 10/12/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/10/07, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Basically, if I can view your image on the screen, I can grab a copy of it.
> >All you ca
On 12/10/07, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Basically, if I can view your image on the screen, I can grab a copy of it.
>All you can do is make it harder for me.
I'm thinking of reducing file sizes on my online pics. I'm thinking
maybe 4k for a pic 800X600.
Viewers see a few pixels o
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:53:57AM -0400, graywolf wrote:
> Sad story, Dave. The only way I have found to keep people from stealing your
> images off the internet, is to not have them on the internet.
>
> Unfortunately the web was never intended to be secure, it was developed by
> academics for
Flash probably won't work either, there are plenty of flash decoders
that can be used to get the images if someone wants to go through the
trouble.
Scott Loveless wrote:
> David J Brooks wrote:
>
>> Well this morning i received an email from a friend on the committee
>> saying some one emaile
, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Loveless"
> Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
>
>
> > David J Brooks wrote:
> >> Well this morning i received an email from a friend
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
>
> I would send the person who submitted your photos an invoice for your
> standard
> charge and take them to small claims court if they do not pay it.
Sad story, Dave. The only way I have found to keep people from stealing your
images off the internet, is to not have them on the internet.
Unfortunately the web was never intended to be secure, it was developed by
academics for academics which in this commercial age folks tend to forget. I
have
>
> From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Her only
> comment was, have a look and enjoy.
>
> Now that takes some balls.
>
Raises my suspicions even further about Canadian women.
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAf
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
> David J Brooks wrote:
>> Well this morning i received an email from a friend on the committee
>> saying some one emailed heR some files for
David J Brooks wrote:
> Well this morning i received an email from a friend on the committee
> saying some one emailed heR some files for the slide show. Her only
> comment was, have a look and enjoy.
>
> So, i opened them up, about 12 of them, and lo and behold, about 5 of
> them were taken from
This is so pathetic, its almost humorous.
The past 5 years or so, i have made a slide show out of the shots i
have taken at the horse shows and play them before, during and up to
the dancing, at the year end awards banquet, which is Saturday.
On the equine BB i moderate at, i always ask if anyone
46 matches
Mail list logo
