checking the outage extent from my cell when we lost the power
(happened 2-3 times in a row last year).
Besides, depending on the extent of the outage, internet might still
be working for some time after it. If, say, the outage is limited to
your subdivision, the modem is supposed to have a ba
of the outage, internet might still be
working for some time after it. If, say, the outage is limited to your
subdivision, the modem is supposed to have a battery in it, and so does
the pole/cable equipment. Then it would depend how well the ISP maintains
those batteries; it varies.
And as far
So I thought I'd share.
I just got a robo-call from my electric utility to warn me there might
be a "storm" in this area in the next few days, and that I should
consider in advance what to do if the power goes off.
One of the things they suggested was that if it DOES go off, I
Sigh!
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 8:19 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: So I bought a K-3
Doug Brewer wrote:
indeed I am. I've only fired a couple of test frames so far, but it
seems already like a serious up
You're correct, no doubt. I've been setting it up to my shooting habits.
Now I just have to find time and subjects fora good workout. Nobody
wants to see photos of me.
On 9/20/16 2:19 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
indeed I am. I've only fired a couple of tes
Doug Brewer wrote:
indeed I am. I've only fired a couple of test frames so far, but it
seems already like a serious upgrade.
I've not used a K-7, but even going to a K-x was a huge improvement in
sensor performance from my K20, The K-3 should outperform the K-7 in
pretty much
indeed I am. I've only fired a couple of test frames so far, but it
seems already like a serious upgrade.
On 9/20/16 6:54 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
You're upgrading from a K-7, right?
Prepare to be impressed.
Rick
On Monday, September 19, 2016, Doug Brewer wrote:
Now to see i
Gets better the longer you use it, Doug!!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 7:17 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> indeed I am. I've only fired a couple of test frames so far, but it seems
> already like a serious upgrade.
>
>> On 9/20/16 6:54 AM, Rick Womer
You're upgrading from a K-7, right?
Prepare to be impressed.
Rick
On Monday, September 19, 2016, Doug Brewer wrote:
> Now to see if I can do anything good with it. Also bought a Fuji X100s,
> because, you know.
>
> Carry on, then.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http:/
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
> Now to see if I can do anything good with it. Also bought a Fuji X100s,
Kenny boy loves his, so carry on.:-)
Dave
> because, you know.
>
> Carry on, then.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
&
On September 19, 2016 5:12:35 PM PDT, "P.J. Alling"
wrote:
>I think I'm jealous, but then again I really want a K-3 with a K-5 UI.
I like the k3 ui a lot better
>
>On 9/19/2016 7:55 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
>> Now to see if I can do anything good with it. Also bought a Fuji
>> X100s, because, y
On 9/19/2016 8:04 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Now to see if I can do anything good with it. Also bought a Fuji X100s,
because, you know.
Carry on, then.
Most of the good that I do with my cameras is to salve other people's
egos by lowering the bar of artistic merit.
Larry,
I think I'm jealous, but then again I really want a K-3 with a K-5 UI.
On 9/19/2016 7:55 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
Now to see if I can do anything good with it. Also bought a Fuji
X100s, because, you know.
Carry on, then.
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achie
Doug Brewer wrote:
Now to see if I can do anything good with it. Also bought a Fuji X100s,
because, you know.
Carry on, then.
Most of the good that I do with my cameras is to salve other people's
egos by lowering the bar of artistic merit.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on
Now to see if I can do anything good with it. Also bought a Fuji X100s,
because, you know.
Carry on, then.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
see above
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Gallery looks great, and amazing results with the ISO.
Grace is on her way to being all grown up. I think all of us are a little sad
to see her move as we won’t be seeing photos of her as readily as when she
lived with you. Please extend my best wishes to Grace as she embarks on her
new adve
They look great! I never would have guessed the ISO was that high.
Just amazing.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I had a going away party for Gracie yesterday. She and her mother are moving
> to Houston in about 10 days. I shot a few pics while the kids played
> voll
Especially memorable images for you Paul !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: GESO A fatal mistake proves not so fatal
I had a going away party for Gracie yesterday. She and her mother are
12 x 18. It looks good. Here’s the
>> gallery I put together for the parents.
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=1091841
>>
>> Best
>> Paul
>
> --
> Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.
>
> --
> PDML Pen
ne of them, 3210, at 12 x
18. It looks good. Here’s the gallery I put together for the parents.
http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=1091841
Best
Paul
--
Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
On 19/6/16, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I had a going away party for Gracie yesterday. She and her mother are
>moving to Houston in about 10 days. I shot a few pics while the kids
>played volleyball and really managed to foul up my camera settings. I
>had it in Tav mode with the s
they all look great. I have done the "busy fingers thing myself. Its
very easy to do on the X30 with such a small camera and school bus
driver size fingers.:-)
Dave
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I had a going away party for Gracie yesterday. She and her mother are movi
I had a going away party for Gracie yesterday. She and her mother are moving to
Houston in about 10 days. I shot a few pics while the kids played volleyball
and really managed to foul up my camera settings. I had it in Tav mode with the
shutter set at 1000 and the ap at 5.6. I was using the 150-
Looks like Sigma has introduced a pair of Mirrorless cameras into their
SA mount system. Unlike Pentax the cameras don't look to be designed by
Mark Newson and do have actual EFVs, (viewfinders), built into their
bodies.
Unlike the truly bizarre looking Quatro fixed lens cameras they've been
e personal saga; but that is the beauty of
true blogs, they are by a real person; Mike is a good writer, and he
engages with his readers pretty successfully i think
i don't read every article, and i follow it via RSS so i rarely see
the ads; in addition to the articles by Ctein i enj
ecame heavy on the personal saga; but that is the beauty of true
> blogs, they are by a real person; Mike is a good writer, and he engages with
> his readers pretty successfully i think
>
> i don't read every article, and i follow it via RSS so i rarely see the ads;
> in addition to t
ery article, and i follow it via RSS so i rarely see the ads;
in addition to the articles by Ctein i enjoy the photographers TOP
highlights and occasionally the gear articles (which are quite atypical for
a photo site); i have even bought prints from his very affordable print sales
i get a mix
Larry,
Are you implying that TOP is sci-fi too? ;-)
Igor
Tue Dec 1 13:48:06 EST 2015 Larry Colen wrote:
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 01.12.15 um 14:56 schrieb Darren Addy:
Forgive my ignorance, but what is TOP.
I'm tempted to answer that, in this case, ignorance is bliss.
So, cli
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 01.12.15 um 14:56 schrieb Darren Addy:
Forgive my ignorance, but what is TOP.
I'm tempted to answer that, in this case, ignorance is bliss.
So, click at your own risk:
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/blog_index.html
TOP - The Online Photographer.
I wonder if I should send them a cat photo & try to cheer Mike up?
On 12/1/2015 8:56 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but what is TOP.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 30.11.15 um 23:44 schrieb P.J. Alling:
Oh, if only
On 11/30/2015 9:15 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
Interesting!
Also interesting that I'd never have known this until months from now,
if ever. I simply can't recall the last time I consulted LuLa for
anything.
Yeah, it's kind of sad what Luminous landscape has become – a sort of
A web blog run by Mike Johnston, who was once, a member of this list.
Maybe he's still a lurker, I don't know. He burned quite a few members
who paid for his newsletter, maybe about the that newsletter itself, or
about a self published book? They paid in advance? I don't remember,
my memory
Am 01.12.15 um 14:56 schrieb Darren Addy:
Forgive my ignorance, but what is TOP.
I'm tempted to answer that, in this case, ignorance is bliss.
So, click at your own risk:
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/blog_index.html
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher -
Forgive my ignorance, but what is TOP.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
> Am 30.11.15 um 23:44 schrieb P.J. Alling:
>
>> Oh, if only Kennyboy would end his internet career by doing the same
>> thing.
>
>
> ...and, once we're at it, TOP as well.
>
> Haven't visited LL and
Am 30.11.15 um 23:44 schrieb P.J. Alling:
Oh, if only Kennyboy would end his internet career by doing the same thing.
...and, once we're at it, TOP as well.
Haven't visited LL and Ken's site in years. Recently had a look at TOP
and all I saw were endless posts about all the problems he's hav
e
in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
different.
I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
anything because of the error, but still annoying).
What in the he
When I first started out in photography, I was on there every day
poring over the articles. I only found out because TOP had a post
about it.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>>Interesting!
>>
>>Also interesting that I'd never have known this until mon
Bruce Walker wrote:
>Interesting!
>
>Also interesting that I'd never have known this until months from now,
>if ever. I simply can't recall the last time I consulted LuLa for
>anything.
Yeah, it's kind of sad what Luminous landscape has become a sort of
Robb Report (a luxury goods magazine whic
Interesting!
Also interesting that I'd never have known this until months from now,
if ever. I simply can't recall the last time I consulted LuLa for
anything.
I'm sure they offer value for their knowledge base, but everything is
also freely available with some Googling.
Yeah, too bad about the
Which brings up an interesting thought, I wonder if I could actually get
people to pay me to indulge my hobbies.
Oh, if only Kennyboy would end his internet career by doing the same thing.
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
is past summer with my K-3, and I shoot
> > exclusively RAW, no JPEGs. But every image was coming out in all these
> > otherworldly colours...which Aperture automatically fixed so I didn't
> > pay much attention. Then I made some astrophotos and noticed that the
> > sky
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:39:49 -0600, Darren Addy wrote:
> Well I have assumed my RAW files were OK, but I haven't checked yet.
> Now I'm wondering. Will have to check when I get home later this
> weekend. I have no explanation for how a RAW file would show
> processing like that. I thought a RAW fil
PM, Steve Sharpe wrote:
> The same thing happened to me this past summer with my K-3, and I shoot
> exclusively RAW, no JPEGs. But every image was coming out in all these
> otherworldly colours...which Aperture automatically fixed so I didn't
> pay much attention. Then I made some a
The same thing happened to me this past summer with my K-3, and I shoot
exclusively RAW, no JPEGs. But every image was coming out in all these
otherworldly colours...which Aperture automatically fixed so I didn't
pay much attention. Then I made some astrophotos and noticed that the
sk
I got caught mid event by the "Cross-Processing" demon too using my
K3, had me baffled, must have bumped the buttons. I didn't have time
to screw about so I reverted to single body shooting and it was a long
event, I must have changed lenses 100 times :(
On 25 November 2015 at 06:
Ok, so SWAG - it's bracketing white balance.
On 11/23/2015 2:26 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an idea:
http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John wrote:
On 11/22/2015 1:
JPEG produced looked
different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
different.
I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant
one before, but each was some sort of extreme
in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
different.
I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
anything because of the
produced looked
>>>> different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
>>>> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
>>>> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
>>>> different.
era post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
>>> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
>>> different.
>>>
>>> I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
>>> anything because
I sorted out a similar problem for a friend yesterday - he was complaining that
his new Canon p&s had suddenly started doing this random stuff, so I just reset
it for him. It has a 'Beauty' setting which I think he'd set accidentally. Only
such a thing could produce such
point each JPEG produced looked
>> different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
>> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
>> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
>> different.
>>
.
I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
anything because of the error, but still annoying).
What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?
Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.
--
Science - Questions we may
re, but each was some sort of extreme
> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
> different.
>
> I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
> anyt
after that point each JPEG produced looked
different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
different.
I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are
r only health issue.
>
> I did look at the PUG - Marco's and David Mann's are my faves.
> The two southwestern ones made me miss that area more and more
> the Bosque, and the horsies
>
> I didn't do any ebay work for two weeks because of putting
> the show togethe
And would need a light source for any of those???
--
Bruce
On March 23, 2015 2:29:56 PM PDT, "P.J. Alling"
wrote:
>Not a positive?
>
>A disparaging remark?
>
>My bank balance.
>
>On 3/23/2015 3:45 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> What's a negative?:)
>>
>> --
>> Bruce
>>
>> On March 23, 2015 12:12:25 P
Not a positive?
A disparaging remark?
My bank balance.
On 3/23/2015 3:45 PM, Bruce wrote:
What's a negative?:)
--
Bruce
On March 23, 2015 12:12:25 PM PDT, Darren Addy wrote:
Your smart phone or tablet is a portable light table for viewing
negatives and slides. Better than that, even, y
On 3/23/2015 3:12 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Your smart phone or tablet is a portable light table for viewing
negatives and slides. Better than that, even, your smart phone or
tablet is a negative or slide illuminator for scanners that lack that
built-in capability.
http://www.appannie.com/apps/ios/
no wonder my cuneiform always looks like crap. I've been trying to do
it in the dark.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Darren Addy wrote:
>
>>Your smart phone or tablet is a portable light table for viewing
>>negatives and slides.
>
> Also makes a great light source when p
Darren Addy wrote:
>Your smart phone or tablet is a portable light table for viewing
>negatives and slides.
Also makes a great light source when pressing cuneiform into clay
tablets indoors!
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
P
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Bruce wrote:
> What's a negative?:)
My blood type.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
What's a negative?:)
--
Bruce
On March 23, 2015 12:12:25 PM PDT, Darren Addy wrote:
>Your smart phone or tablet is a portable light table for viewing
>negatives and slides. Better than that, even, your smart phone or
>tablet is a negative or slide illuminator for scanners that lack that
>bui
I've used my monitor as a slide viewer by bringing up a white page
elements and propping up the screen at a low angle - or just holding up
a sheet of negs or slides against it in its normal position
ann
On 3/23/2015 15:12, Darren Addy wrote:
Your smart phone or tablet is a portable light tabl
Your smart phone or tablet is a portable light table for viewing
negatives and slides. Better than that, even, your smart phone or
tablet is a negative or slide illuminator for scanners that lack that
built-in capability.
http://www.appannie.com/apps/ios/app/light-box-illuminator-viewer/
I'm sure
reat
>> phone pictures.
>>
>>> On 3/15/15 7:12 AM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
>>>
>>> Message: 5 Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:10:07 -0400 From: paul stenquist
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: Re: So Q close Mess
I' d be honored. Point away.
On 3/15/15 2:12 PM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:34:04 -0700
From: Larry Colen
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: So Q close
Message-ID:<5505c28c.6070...@red4est.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-885
2 AM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
>>
>> Message: 5 Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:10:07 -0400 From: paul stenquist
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: So Q close Message-ID:
>> Content-Type:
>> text/plain; charset=utf-8 You don?t have a phone?
> > From: Mark C
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: So Q close
Message-ID: <5504b447.5080...@charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Excellent set, Don. Sweet light, great compositions. My Q has seen
little use - your photos make me wan
A friend just asked me on my facebook page about the Q, mind if I point
him to your set?
Donald Guthrie wrote:
Recently I felt I needed a small camera to to have at hand. In a fit of
madness & loyalty I bought Pentax Q7, the toy that is a little more.
Here is a small group of closeups on the i
Nice of you to say Bob, but I will not let my wife see your comment
about needs. Thanks for the view.
On 3/14/15 4:17 PM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 5 Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 11:59:32 -0500 From: Bob Sullivan
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: So Q close Message-ID
Congrats on the Q7 purchase Don! A nice set and I'll agree with Bruce
on 439, although I think it is most pleasing if looked at as a
horizontal composition.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Very cool, Don. Some fine compositions and the colours and tones are
> wonderful. Es
Very cool, Don. Some fine compositions and the colours and tones are
wonderful. Especially like 439.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Donald Guthrie wrote:
> Recently I felt I needed a small camera to to have at hand. In a fit of
> madness & loyalty I bought Pentax Q7, the toy that is a little m
You don’t have a phone?
> On Mar 14, 2015, at 7:10 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Donald Guthrie wrote:
>> Recently I felt I needed a small camera to to have at hand. In a fit of
>> madness & loyalty I bought Pentax Q7, the toy that is a little more.
>>
>> Here is a small group of closeups o
Donald Guthrie wrote:
Recently I felt I needed a small camera to to have at hand. In a fit of
madness & loyalty I bought Pentax Q7, the toy that is a little more.
Here is a small group of closeups on the ice. Standard PP and little
cropping.
All comments welcome.
https://www.flickr.com/photo
Excellent set, Don. Sweet light, great compositions. My Q has seen
little use - your photos make me want to address that!
Mark
On 3/14/2015 12:51 PM, Donald Guthrie wrote:
Recently I felt I needed a small camera to to have at hand. In a fit
of madness & loyalty I bought Pentax Q7, the toy tha
I've been considering a similar type of thing. I would be very interested in
your thoughts and impressions of the Q and system. The pics you displayed look
quite nice.
--
Bruce
On March 14, 2015 9:51:05 AM PDT, Donald Guthrie wrote:
>Recently I felt I needed a small camera to to have at h
ay, March 14, 2015 9:51:05 AM
Subject: So Q close
Recently I felt I needed a small camera to to have at hand. In a fit of
madness & loyalty I bought Pentax Q7, the toy that is a little more.
Here is a small group of closeups on the ice. Standard PP and little
cropping.
All c
Don,
You don't need any more cameras!
Those pictures are excellent.
The first 4-5 of the leaves are wonderful.
Depth and sharpness abound.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Donald Guthrie wrote:
> Recently I felt I needed a small camera to to have at hand. In a fit of
> madness &
Recently I felt I needed a small camera to to have at hand. In a fit of
madness & loyalty I bought Pentax Q7, the toy that is a little more.
Here is a small group of closeups on the ice. Standard PP and little
cropping.
All comments welcome.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/valdon/sets/7215764
p;keywords=58mm+lens+hood>
>
> at Amazon, which is pretty funny, at least I think so.
>
> --
> I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
> immortality through not dying.
> -- Woody Allen
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>
again. In my search I found this.
<http://www.amazon.com/BRAND-Professional-28-105mm-55-250mm-100-300mm/dp/B003WD2SLQ/ref=sr_1_33?ie=UTF8&qid=1420427811&sr=8-33&keywords=58mm+lens+hood>
at Amazon, which is pretty funny, at least I think so.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
m/BRAND-Professional-28-105mm-55-250mm-100-300mm/dp/B003WD2SLQ/ref=sr_1_33?ie=UTF8&qid=1420427811&sr=8-33&keywords=58mm+lens+hood>
>
> at Amazon, which is pretty funny, at least I think so.
At least it wasn't fitted back-to-front.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discus
250mm-100-300mm/dp/B003WD2SLQ/ref=sr_1_33?ie=UTF8&qid=1420427811&sr=8-33&keywords=58mm+lens+hood>
at Amazon, which is pretty funny, at least I think so.
Handy if you want some deliberate flare and some deliberate vignetting...
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian
$4.30 is a bit steep even with free shipping.
J
- Original Message -
From: "P.J. Alling"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, January 4, 2015 7:48:05 PM
Subject: So what's wrong with this picture...
I've been looking for a replacement lens h
?ie=UTF8&qid=1420427811&sr=8-33&keywords=58mm+lens+hood>
at Amazon, which is pretty funny, at least I think so.
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml
ave my screens "pretty well set up" - any time I send a print job
>>> to CostCo and say "no corrections" they come back looking like I'd like.
>>>
>>> Lately, though, I've occasionally hooked up a second monitor to my
>>> laptop a
think
I have my screens "pretty well set up" - any time I send a print job
to CostCo and say "no corrections" they come back looking like I'd like.
Lately, though, I've occasionally hooked up a second monitor to my
laptop and the appearance is WAY OFF. I'd love to be
quot;no
corrections" they come back looking like I'd like.
Lately, though, I've occasionally hooked up a second monitor to my laptop and
the appearance is WAY OFF. I'd love to be able to get those sorted and so far
no manipulation of the controls either on the laptop or
e
> my screens "pretty well set up" - any time I send a print job to CostCo and
> say "no corrections" they come back looking like I'd like.
>
> Lately, though, I've occasionally hooked up a second monitor to my laptop and
> the appearance is WAY OFF.
monitor to my laptop and
the appearance is WAY OFF. I'd love to be able to get those sorted and so far
no manipulation of the controls either on the laptop or the panel itself has
yielded acceptable results.
It would be nice to have a profile do the work for me - but since I so rarely
pl
http://42graphy.org/misc/Baikal/_IR20600.jpg
(I brought down to 0 the saturation for all colors in HSL except for
blue).
:-)
All comments are welcome.
Yes - that definitely is blue.
Pity about the central horizon (sorry, couldn't resist!)
Brian,
I don't mind any comments, - so,
saturation for all colors in HSL except for
blue).
:-)
All comments are welcome.
Yes - that definitely is blue.
Pity about the central horizon (sorry, couldn't resist!)
Brian,
I don't mind any comments, - so, don't be sorry.
But I am not sure what you actually meant..
Did yo
.
Yes - that definitely is blue.
Pity about the central horizon (sorry, couldn't resist!)
Brian,
I don't mind any comments, - so, don't be sorry.
But I am not sure what you actually meant..
Did you mean that the open horizon portion was centered?
Well, the comment was tongue-i
blue.
Pity about the central horizon (sorry, couldn't resist!)
Brian,
I don't mind any comments, - so, don't be sorry.
But I am not sure what you actually meant..
Did you mean that the open horizon portion was centered?
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
OK, you succeeded! :)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Igor PDML-StR"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 8:24:52 PM
Subject: Re: BESO -- Blue every so often
Jack,
That was exactly the point of this "exercise". :-)
I felt like making this p
Quoting Igor PDML-StR :
I feel very blue at the moment:
http://42graphy.org/misc/Baikal/_IR20600.jpg
(I brought down to 0 the saturation for all colors in HSL except for blue).
:-)
All comments are welcome.
Yes - that definitely is blue.
Pity about the central horizon (sorry, couldn't re
uot;
To: "PDML"
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 7:24:26 PM
Subject: BESO -- Blue every so often
I feel very blue at the moment:
http://42graphy.org/misc/Baikal/_IR20600.jpg
(I brought down to 0 the saturation for all colors in HSL except for
blue).
:-)
All comments are welcome.
Blue seems awfully strong.(?)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Igor PDML-StR"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 7:24:26 PM
Subject: BESO -- Blue every so often
I feel very blue at the moment:
http://42graphy.org/misc/Baikal/_IR20600.jpg
(I brought down
201 - 300 of 2917 matches
Mail list logo
