- Original Message -
From: "Steve Desjardins"
Subject: Re: Soon to be new istD owners
. Am I right in thinking
> that
> if I use A-type lenses off 'A' I can only use them on M and also have
> to
> press the green button?
Yes.
William Robb
take a drink from a
fire hydrant.
Cheers
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 11:06 PM
Subject: Re: Soon to be new istD owners
> I have ordered mine yesterday.
> Jens, Denmark
>
>
ay, January 11, 2004 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: Soon to be new istD owners
> A brief test outdoors on a stormy day with very bright intervals suggests
> that the matrix metering is a little more wayward than that in the MZ-5n -
I
> had dark foregrounds when appreciable amounts of sky
- if possible - be part
of the next firmware upgrade!
Regards
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Cycad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 11. januar 2004 15:35
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Soon to be new istD owners
I bought mine yesterday :-) I'm an amateur, and found it dif
is adjust both endogenous and the flash
exposures, or only one of these?
I apologize if these questions have already come up, but I only rarely find
time to read more than a few postings to this list.
Cheers
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
I have ordered mine yesterday.
Jens, Denmark
Shel, it's sounding better. Most of my preferred lenses are K and M.
Hell, but I do so love my KX cameras. Mebbe this can wait. None the
less, I do wonder if the changes were made, in part, because of this
absolutely nutty list. If so, thank you Pentax! I'm much more confident
of "future direc
I'm considering it as well. Most of my Pentax 35mm lenses are K
versions. I could use the *istD for some of the work I do as well as
for personal photography. I might be able to use it for a lot of the
work I do with "res up" software. On my day job I use photos taken by
other people. Clint Cle
So, how many of the list are now considering the istD now that it will
work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some thought.
shel
I was rather waiting for a price drop as I knew I could live with
this shortcoming by unscrewing the K and M lenses. Still, it is a
better camera now
"Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>LOL. I wonder if the camera companies think about the tax return bunny
>when planning US releases.
Why do you think the PMA show is in February? ;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Why do you think I'm asking all these questions, Boris me lad? I can see the
istd as a supplement to the leica and the mx/lx bodies, and as a replacement
for the sony digi i'm now using. i do like a lot about the digi concept, yet
there are times film works better for me. and while i like the li
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 11:08 PM
Subject: Soon to be new istD owners
> So, how many of the list are now considering the istD now that it
will
> work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some
thought.
>
> shel
>
>
The FF sensor issue is a question of cost plain and simple. I doubt
Pentax will come out with a 2000+ USD camera, and will use whatever
sensor falls in this range for their high end DSLR. The "higher" end
market will be C and N. I'm also pretty sure that Pentax's efforts will
be focused for a whi
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 11:09 PM
To: PDML
Subject: Soon to be new istD owners
So, how many of the list are now considering the istD now that it will
work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some thought.
shel
Count me in. One Giant step forward..
Vic
So, how many of the list are now considering the istD now that it will
work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some thought.
shel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 11:08 PM
Subject: Soon to be new istD owners
> So, how many of the list are now considering the istD now that it will
> work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some thought.
>
> shel
>
>
Hi Steve ...
I'm looking at the current model - or perhaps the less expensive one
mentioned here earlier - as a replacement for my 4mp Sony and as a
supplement to my film cameras. Personally, I don't see a need for a larger
sensor or higher pixel count ... of course, that may change should I move
It's on my to-buy-someday-soon list.
( Now, where's that lotto ticket? )
>So, how many of the list are now considering the istD now that it will
>work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some thought.
>shel
I really like that feature on my Sony. It allows me to shoot a big TIFF and also a
small
JPEG for a quick view of the frame in the PS browser window or for a quick run through
in
other software without having to wait for the big TIFF files to load. It gives me a
quickie
email file should that
8MP and full frame sensor (Want). Then it would be like the DSLR Pentax
teased us with. Enough of this APS in 35mm, 35mm in 645 crap.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Cotty wrote:
> Which begs the question: what improvements are wanted / needed on the
> *ist D rev2 ?
> Cheers,
> Cotty
On 9/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>I am considering getting one, although I would like to see what the second
>generation dslr will have for improvements. Canon had the D30. There were
>some yelps about some of the features which resulted in the D60. So I am
>going to wait a bit to see wh
> So, how many of the list are now considering
the istD now that it will
> work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some thought.
>
> shel
>
I'm still debating.
I want to upgrade from the curent 2.74 meg camera i currently own,D1, to
I am
Arnold
Shel Belinkoff schrieb:
So, how many of the list are now considering the istD now that it will
work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some thought.
shel
rom: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:08:38 -0800
> To: PDML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Soon to be new istD owners
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 01:06:29 -0500
>
> So, h
So, how many of the list are now considering the istD now that it will
work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some thought.
shel
25 matches
Mail list logo
