Re: Takumar lenshood for an M 135/3.5

2002-09-27 Thread Keith Whaley
Lukasz Kacperczyk wrote: > > Keith, > M is a line of Pentax lenses in K mount dedicated for the M series cameras. > M 135/3.5 is not a M-42 lens, but a PK bayonet lens. Okay...I have a 50mm f/1.4 lens, Pentax-M, with bayonet mount. Only lens I have that's so marked. I should have recognized th

RE: Takumar lenshood for an M 135/3.5

2002-09-27 Thread Lukasz Kacperczyk
ssage- From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 1:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Takumar lenshood for an M 135/3.5 Not sure you'll get this post in return. I have 5 posts backed up that were refused, for some reason... keith whal

Re: Takumar lenshood for an M 135/3.5

2002-09-27 Thread Peter Alling
It should work fine. At 11:32 PM 9/26/2002 +0200, you wrote: >Hi all, >my question has nothing to do with a DSLR, personal attacks, or... err - I >don't think we've seen anything else for the past few days :) > >I know the M 135/3.5 has a built-in hood, but it's very shallow, so I though >about g

Re: Takumar lenshood for an M 135/3.5

2002-09-27 Thread andre
>You can check a hood's clearance by looking through the film gate with the >shutter held open open at "B". Sight from the corner of the frame into the >lens and ideally you shouldn't see the hood. Personal experience, 'though, >tells me that sometimes the hood can be seen without vignetting act

Takumar lenshood for an M 135/3.5

2002-09-27 Thread Ɓukasz Kacperczyk
Hi all, my question has nothing to do with a DSLR, personal attacks, or... err - I don't think we've seen anything else for the past few days :) I know the M 135/3.5 has a built-in hood, but it's very shallow, so I though about getting something else for it. I found a beautiful metal hood for lon