I am running the non-sub version of LR6.9 and I built a set of presets
for dehaze, it's all there in the engine they just disabled the UI on
the non-sub version, enticement towards the subscription model I
expect, grrr.
On 18 March 2017 at 14:10, Philip Northeast wrote:
> Stan
> I have been using
Stan
I have been using Adobe subscription for Lightroom and Photoshop for a
about a couple of years.
There are no new versions, Adobe just makes updates to the current
program to add new features, and fix bugs.
The dehaze tool is fantastic!
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
O
I am gradually reluctantly coming to the notion that I will switch from classic
Lightroom to Lightroom CC.
I’ve been skimming through some of Scott Kelby’s instructional videos and some
of what he shows on capabilities of the CC version (e.g., dehaze) looks useful.
And even though I haven’t use
Would that be ..
(A) a full-frame announcement? or
(B) an announcement of a full frame camera???
(C)none of the above
ann
On 4/1/2014 13:09, Larry Colen wrote:
I’d say that we’d be right on schedule today for a full frame Pentax
announcement.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I had heard it was because they ran out of pixels...
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W-PDML"
Subject: Re: Timing
It was cancelled after an infestation of Mongolian Death Worms shorted all
the electronics.
B
On 4/1/2014 1:09 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I’d say that we’d be right on schedule today for a full frame Pentax
announcement.
Whatever. I've got enough saved.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visi
t: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 7:09 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Timing
>
> I’d say that we’d be right on schedule today for a full frame Pentax
> announcement.
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I am pleased to announce that all of my recent Pentax digital SLR’s have been
full frame. I have had no issues with any mismatch between lenses and the APS-C
sensor and consistently get full frame coverage.
stan
On Apr 1, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I’d say that we’d be right on s
Pity there is no camera show in Ulan Bator today...
-Messaggio originale-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 7:09 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Timing
I’d say that we’d be right on schedule today for a full frame Pentax
announcement.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
We get one every year at about this time.
On Apr 1, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I’d say that we’d be right on schedule today for a full frame Pentax
> announcement.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUB
I’d say that we’d be right on schedule today for a full frame Pentax
announcement.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
ore, but they are always interesting.
>
> http://themetapicture.com/timing-perfection/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Some of these we have seen before, but they are always interesting.
http://themetapicture.com/timing-perfection/
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Yes, Larry, Metapicture sure can suck you in!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> On 12/9/2011 5:39 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
>>
>> Dan, do you remember the cover photo in Pop Photo many years ago that
>> depicted
Yes, I remember it well. I stumbled across this one, and it made me
smile, so I posted it.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
> Dan, do you remember the cover photo in Pop Photo many years ago that
> depicted the sa
From: Larry Colen
On 12/9/2011 5:39 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
Dan, do you remember the cover photo in Pop Photo many years ago that
depicted the same sort of shot but much closer to the model? It is
one of my most memorable shots that makes me smile. This one did the
same and I like that it was
On 12/9/2011 5:39 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
Dan, do you remember the cover photo in Pop Photo many years ago that
depicted the same sort of shot but much closer to the model? It is
one of my most memorable shots that makes me smile. This one did the
same and I like that it was from a longer dis
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
http://themetapicture.com/taken-at-the-right-time/
A fine example of the delight to be found in the realms of higher
mathematics.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visi
Dan, do you remember the cover photo in Pop Photo many years ago that
depicted the same sort of shot but much closer to the model? It is
one of my most memorable shots that makes me smile. This one did the
same and I like that it was from a longer distance.
Thanks for posting.
Walt
On Thu, Dec 8
http://themetapicture.com/taken-at-the-right-time/
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directi
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
>>>> http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
>>>
>>> A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x
>>> gives
>>> so little improvement over the 60x. Is the diff
Note the smiley, Joe. Others have commented on your negativity - I've
stayed away from that. I was just poking a little fun at the reputation
you've garnered here over the past few months as someone who's frequently
finding fault. We can all learn to laugh at ourselves a bit ...
Why do I give i
Well, we've got to remember that it's Joe making the call ;-))
Shel
-
Shel, why do you feel the need to blurt out a statement like that? And
why do you give in to the feeling?
I expected, perhaps naively, that a card that is 150% faster in its
nominal rating (150x vs 60x) should give some
>> http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
>
> A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x
> gives
> so little improvement over the 60x. Is the difference due to different
> brands of card? Or is 150x overkill for the K10D?
Yo
If you did it right (yes, it is a pretty simple test) and these are
the numbers, it shows that you're getting something for your money
over the Transcend 150x cards. I suspected that the Transcend cards
might be rated a bit optimistically.
Of course, I'd like to get my hands on an Extreme II
> http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
Thanks for that, very interesting.
I just conducted a similar test (no, I don't have a movie to watch :)
K10D, RAW (DNG) Test, SanDisk Extreme III 2GB SD card:
a.. 75 RAW exposures, 1.25 exp per sec or 0.8 secs per exp av
matter of download and xfer time on the computer to
consider. The difference I experienced between a 40X card and an 80X card
was enough to convince me to _always_ get the fastest card that's
affordable.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Adam Maas
> Joseph Tainter wrote:
> >
Joseph Tainter wrote:
> http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
>
> -
>
> A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x gives
> so little improvement over the 60x. Is the difference due to different
> brands of card? Or is 150x
>> page I did on the *ist DS bodies last July. Updated and QuickTime
>> movies of the capture included ... you can see how the cameras'
>> buffer size and write speed to the cards affects the distribution of
>> sequence captures explicitly that way.
>>
>> http:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
>> http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
>
> A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x
> gives
> so little improvement over the 60x. Is the difference due to different
> brand
of
> sequence captures explicitly that way.
>
> http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
>
> enjoy,
> Godfrey
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
-
A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x gives
so little improvement over the 60x. Is the difference due to different
brands of card? Or is 150x overkill for the K10D?
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
tures explicitly that way.
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
enjoy,
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Maybe not Bruce, but the tree branches on the left side really make this for
me. If they
were not
there it would be just another sunset shot.
The limbs break up the colour and add depth to the shot.
But thats just me.:-)
Dave
> In a recent thread we were
46 AM, you wrote:
ft> I should have such bad timing!!
ft> Lovely colours, Bruce. Lovely sunset, well caught.
ft> cheers,
ft> frank
ft> --
ft> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
ft> On 12/10/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED
, FA 50/1.4, Handheld
> ISO 400, 1/90 sec @ f/9.5
> Converted from Raw using Capture One LE
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2566.htm
>
> Comments welcome
>
I should have such bad timing!!
Lovely colours, Bruce. Lovely sunset, well caught.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Thanks, Rick. I can tell you that all the way home I was watching
this sunset just wishing I could have been prepared for it.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, December 10, 2005, 6:42:38 AM, you wrote:
RW> Bad timing but great shot! The brighter sky behind
RW> the trees balanc
Bad timing but great shot! The brighter sky behind
the trees balances the composition nicely.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a recent thread we were discussing having great
> lighting and not
> the right location or lacking a camera situation.
> Well,
In a recent thread we were discussing having great lighting and not
the right location or lacking a camera situation. Well, that happened
to me today. I was finishing a shoot of a family session outdoors and
we had just finished and were on a time crunch to get back. Wouldn't
you know it that a
I tend to agree with Capa's comment. Having seen the Requiem show, and looked at
the photos in the book, it became clear that those pics that were less than
perfect technically - OOF, showing camera movement - had, in general, a far
greater impact than the nicely exposed, sharp pics.
Can't speak
Comments interspersed:
From: Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
> Talk of HCB - I know I told the list about seeing the Magnum at 50 Years
> retrospective with the print of the grinning kid with the wine bottles
("Rue
> Muffon" or something like that).
rue Mouffetard.
Yes, well, I was close. 1 out
Hi,
it is still a peaceful thread.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Sunday, January 25, 2004, 11:09:41 AM, you wrote:
> Hi!
>>His 'autobiography' is called 'Slightly Out of Focus'. He is supposed to
>>have said that it was better for a war photographer if your pictures were
>>slightly out of focus because it
> Call it muscle memory, or whatever.
Damn, Frank ... that was the term i was looking for.
Recently read a few articles about it, even how it's
used in the military for certain maneuvers.
> And, sometimes, despite being quite flawed, a shot works anyway.
How true ... a perusal of Cartier-Bresso
all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Timing (was: As usual: photo advise sought)
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:54:22 +0200
Hi!
Hi!
SB> I recently put up a pic for a few people to comment upon. Ann really tore
SB> into me for posting such crap. One of her comments was that it was obvious
SB> that I wasn't thinking about the light. So, while the subject was good (she
SB> allowed me that much ) the photograph was poor. I
> I put colour codes into my spreadsheet so anything out by
> 1/2-stop or more is
> red, 1/4 to 1/2 stop is orange, and less than 1/4 is green. I
> didn't put these
> into the web version because it would take me ages.
>
> - Dave
Dave,
Why don't you make a pdf file direct out of the spreadsheet
46 matches
Mail list logo
