In a message dated 4/10/2007 9:28:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As an aside question: my cheapskate challenge entry:
http://boris.isra-shop.com/misc/cheapskate.html - was it sufficiently
unclattered?
Also comparing the above content with, say, this link:
My annual subscription is coming up on PBase and I'm considering a
possible change of service. For those of you who have used Photo.net,
how do you like it ?
I'm overall somewhat satisfied with PBase, but sometimes find it gets
bogged down with slow uploading and some folks don't seem to be
I've had an account on Photo.net forever, but I generally dislike
their album/display tools. Same goes for most of the picture hosting
commercial websites.
That's why I build my own pages and lease my own web server, or
use .Mac ...
G
On Apr 10, 2007, at 8:12 AM, Jay Taylor wrote:
My
I've been using photo.net for quite a few years. It's fast and easy.
I'm quite satisfied with it, and it includes a large community. So
feedback is never a problem.
Paul
On Apr 10, 2007, at 8:12 AM, Jay Taylor wrote:
My annual subscription is coming up on PBase and I'm considering a
Many, if not most, ISPs offer free or very inexpensive, space on their
systems for subscribers. I put my pics up on the Earthlink servers and it
works just fine for me. Earthlink allows me to have eight mailboxes, and
each mailbox comes with a certain amount of free space which I use for
hosting
Jay Taylor wrote:
My annual subscription is coming up on PBase and I'm considering a
possible change of service. For those of you who have used Photo.net,
how do you like it ?
I'm overall somewhat satisfied with PBase, but sometimes find it gets
bogged down with slow uploading and some
. It's not ideal, but it's
close enough for the time being.
Tom C.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Web Hosting: PBase or Photo.net?
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:56:28 -0700
Unless your
, but it's
close enough for the time being.
Tom C.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Web Hosting: PBase or Photo.net?
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:56:28 -0700
Unless your ISP
Hi Boris,
I've had my own domain for 7 years and still haven't got a gallery up. Now
that's lazy! :-)
Tom C.
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Web Hosting: PBase or Photo.net?
Date
Hi Tom,
I can certainly understand your POV, and far be it from me to dissuade you.
I'd like to point out one other thing: Once the three or four lines of code
were written, there was no need to write any more code for subsequent pics,
and, had I chosen to do so, I could have set things up just
On Apr 10, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
... the program Godders uses (I think he said it's free) ...
Shel,
I think you're mistaking the way I wrote simple HTML using the Mac OS
X included TextEdit application for the cheapskates thread as what
I normally use to write HTML.
Hi,
You posted two galleries before the cheapskate thread, both of which used a
horizontal format. One was the window mannequins, the other was mostly (or
completely) of trees, iirc. I thought those were with some template that
you used. In any case, those presentations were simple, direct,
for easily and quickly displaying images. It's not ideal, but it's
close enough for the time being.
Tom C.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Web Hosting: PBase or Photo.net
It's close enough...
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Web Hosting: PBase or Photo.net?
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:24:42 -0400
html ain't programming.
Tom C wrote:
Because I
I'll second Shel on that. I use earthlink as well, and you get a total
of 80mb divided over 8 sites. Plenty of space to put up a lot of web
sized photos. There are also free hosting sites you could look into.
You can use your own html and hot link photos you store on quite a few
of them,
Tom C wrote:
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
html ain't programming.
It's close enough...
More importantly... it's just as much work :)
Personally, I'm looking into getting some kind of database back end for
the photo section of my web site. All the ones I've seen are quite
expensive,
You're all making things too complicated. Use Lightroom.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Roberts
Sent: 10 April 2007 21:28
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Web Hosting: PBase or Photo.net?
Tom C wrote
On Apr 10, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Bob W wrote:
You're all making things too complicated. Use Lightroom.
Yes, that works too. I find the presentation styles available a
little fussier than I prefer, however.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Apr 10, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You posted two galleries before the cheapskate thread, both of
which used a
horizontal format. One was the window mannequins, the other was
mostly (or
completely) of trees, iirc. I thought those were with some
template that
you
It really depends on how much work you want to put into it. I can
produce a very quick html gallery with almost no work at all. Much
easier than trying to do something that looks custom in VB, VC or Java.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Tom C wrote:
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
html
Bob W wrote:
You're all making things too complicated. Use Lightroom.
I don't think that would fill my need for a web server database...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
P. J. Alling wrote:
It really depends on how much work you want to put into it. I can
produce a very quick html gallery with almost no work at all. Much
easier than trying to do something that looks custom in VB, VC or Java.
I want to be able to run queries, though. To bring up all photos of
Porta includes a Flash option called SimpleViewer, which is an iteration
of Godfrey's Autoviewer. When you first view the site it offers the
option of viewing in HTML if you don't have Flash installed. There is a
bug in the SimpleViewer crop/fit options for thumbnails - if you choose
fit the
Hi!
I agree with what Godfrey says. I also like, or to be more precise,
don't mind, writing HTML directly. As of recently I've found the
PageBreeze editor to be the best tool for me. It allows WYSIWYG editing
and direct HTML code editing with very easy interface.
However, I am too lazy and
24 matches
Mail list logo
