I bought Tamron 28-200 LD II Super (or smth like that). It works really
fine, but I noticed quite significant vingetting at 28mm wide open. I've
not tried it without lens hood yet, maybe the problem is there. One thing I
don't like the most is very short move of the focus ring, when shooting in
Real pros drive medium or large format cars, you know :)
Atvars
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Mark Roberts wrote:
Anyone whose car cost more than $1700 isn't spending nearly as much on
lenses as
they might be...
Unless you really need a pro car...
:-)
- --
the
advantage of an SMC coating. I have a Pentax FA 28-200 and I am very happy
with slides I have taken with it. I also owned the original Tamron 28-200
but sold it to buy the Pentax version (which is actually the second
generation Tamron Super) mainly because of the better close focus distance.
To my
Nenad Djurdjevic wrote:
Getting back to the original thread:
Artur wrote:
I heard that 28-200 is actually made by Tamron
and the quality of this lens
is very poor.
What exactly do you think is wrong with this lens? The Tamron 28-200 has
been praised by many photography
- Original Message -
From: Nenad Djurdjevic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT cars (was Re: Which Pentax is Pentax...)
| Getting back to the original thread:
|
| Artur wrote:
|
| I heard that 28-200 is actually made by Tamron
| and the quality of this lens
| is very poor.
|
| What
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. quipped:
John Francis commented:
Mike Johnston observed:
The quality of ALL 28-200mm zooms is poor. It's too extreme
a range and the market demands a small size and low price.
It's possible to design a GOOD 28-200, but it would be
the size of a fast 400mm and cost as
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Mark Roberts wrote:
Anyone whose car cost more than $1700 isn't spending nearly as much on lenses as
they might be...
Unless you really need a pro car...
:-)
--
---
Juan J. Buhler | Sr. FX Animator
Hi,
Having read this thread, I finally came to a question.
Why Pentax sells lenses with its logo on them, manufactured by others? I
heard that 28-200 is actually made by Tamron - and the quality of this lens
is very poor. Quality of lenses with the Soligor or Cosina logo on them is
also usually
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:29 AM
Subject: Which Pentax is Pentax? (Was: Vivitar 100/3.5 Macro)
Hi,
Having read this thread, I finally came to a question.
Why Pentax sells lenses with its logo on them, manufactured by others? I
heard that 28-200
Mike Johnston observed:
The quality of ALL 28-200mm zooms is poor. It's too extreme
a range and the market demands a small size and low price.
It's possible to design a GOOD 28-200, but it would be
the size of a fast 400mm and cost as much as a used car.
Canon do a 35-350 variable-aperture
John Francis commented:
Mike Johnston observed:
The quality of ALL 28-200mm zooms is poor. It's too extreme
a range and the market demands a small size and low price.
It's possible to design a GOOD 28-200, but it would be
the size of a fast 400mm and cost as much as a used car.
Canon do
11 matches
Mail list logo
