My sediments exactly!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 5:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OT: FAQ-abuse (was Re: cliches (was Re: UV filters on sexy
> lenses))
>
>
> On Tue, 03 A
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 08:57:32 -0500, Don Sanderson wrote:
> Think mini-mall, not mini-skirt.
Mini-skirt wins every time, here. :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
And what makes you think that anyone who actually reads the FAQ will
follow it???
graywolf wrote:
You guys do know that if I put all this stuff in a FAQ, there would be
no need for the mailing list, as there would be nothing left to talk
about here.
--
Steve Jolly wrote:
English sports cars
Be
Graywolf said:
> You guys do know that if I put all this stuff in a FAQ, there would be no
need
> for the mailing list, as there would be nothing left to talk about here.
>
> --
>
> Steve Jolly wrote:
>
> > English sports cars
> > Beer
> > What Pentax should be doing different and why they're
same question asked about
computers can have a new answer about every week, are cameras, accessories and
techniques so different?
Don
-Original message-
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 08:46:37 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cliches (was Re: UV filters on
DC> zooms v primes
DC> AF v MF
DC> autoexposure v what it says on the inside of the kodak box
DC> plastic v metal
DC> diffusion v condenser enlargers (or fibre v RC, or glass v glassless
DC> carriers, and other cutting edge technologies)
DC> which local pentax distributor is crappeir
But what woul
You guys do know that if I put all this stuff in a FAQ, there would be no need
for the mailing list, as there would be nothing left to talk about here.
--
Steve Jolly wrote:
English sports cars
Beer
What Pentax should be doing different and why they're doomed for not
doing it.
S
--
graywolf
ht
What part of "mini", didn't you understand. There are photographic encyclopedias
out there with all that information in them.
--
Derby Chang wrote:
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
OMG! This 'discussion' again. It's nothing more than a filler. Could
this topic be added to the PDML mini-FAQ ;-) ? Like:
English sports cars
Beer
What Pentax should be doing different and why they're doomed for not
doing it.
S
Chrome v Black
regards,
Anthony Farr
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
OMG! This 'discussion' again. It's nothing more than a filler. Could
this topic be added to the PDML mini-FAQ ;-) ? Like:
Actually, Frantisek has a good point...graywolf, would you consider
adding a cliche discussion list to your FAQ? To Frantisek's, I'd add:
zooms v pr
11 matches
Mail list logo
