Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 9:47 AM Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) Lets all put away the thesauri and make up words, I personally like subterfudge, (put definition here). frank theriault wrote: --- Norm Bau

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:47:59 -0400, Peter J. Alling wrote: > subterfudge, (put definition here). EEEK! TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

rofl! Good one Mark.. Ryan - Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:01 AM Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) > frank theriault

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

On 27/7/04, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, offered: >>Mark, have you ever heard of 'The Meaning of Liff' [sic] >> >>>2/ref=sr_1_10_2/026-1923725-3733232> >> >>You'd love it. > >Got it years ago :) Thought you might, LO

Re: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film

ouch! William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: "Jostein" Subject: Re: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film It's like having you brain smashed out by a slice of lemon wrapped round a Canon D60...:-) Why would anyone wrap a lemon around a lemon? William Robb

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

:47 AM Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) > Lets all put away the thesauri and make up words, I personally like > subterfudge, (put definition here). > > frank theriault wrote: > > >--- Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Vouja De - The feeling that you haven't been Anywhere at all,Ever! D > -Original Message- > From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 9:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not part

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

On 27/7/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, offered: >Lets all put away the thesauri and make up words, I personally like >subterfudge, (put definition here). Ballicles to you sir. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps __

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

--- "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lets all put away the thesauri and make up words, I > personally like > subterfudge, (put definition here). Hell, I don't know what any of these words mean. I just think they sound cool... -frank = "The optimist thinks this is the best

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Tom C wrote: Redundant, superfluous. I like to use them in the same sentence. Isn't repeating yourself like that a bit tautologous? S

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Lets all put away the thesauri and make up words, I personally like subterfudge, (put definition here). frank theriault wrote: --- Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Obtuse. Love that one. Norm Subterfuge. -frank = "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

How unnecessary... Tom C wrote: Redundant, superfluous. I like to use them in the same sentence. Tom C. From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re:

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Hey, it was my word, and she liked it, let her go on... Cotty wrote: On 23/7/04, Tanya Mayer Photography, discombobulated, offered: Kismet! I love that word! I have this list of words that I just love. You know words that just sound so cool when you say them? Some of my favourites are: epipha

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Oops.. Must have been a bit hasty in my post browsing. Harry Seidler was apparently born in Vienna, but moved to Australia. He's got some nice designs (a student architect friend of mine has taught me to appreciate the mastery of the floor of a building he designed here, which protrudes over the ed

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

I've got know, what is a tittynope? Opposite of Dolly Parton? Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California No. It is an adjective describing a few of the women I have dated in my life. Butch

OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Tom reminded me... The tintinabulation of the bells. Regards, Bob S. Tom C. wrote: That's a soliloquy if I've ever heard one.

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

--- Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Google doesn't recognize it, so it doesn't exist... > > keith whaley > > Steve Larson wrote: > > > I've got know, what is a tittynope? Opposite of > Dolly Parton? > > Hi, What are you guys so worried about? Apparently, I'm being held up as a gaz

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

t; Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital > vs Film) > > > Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: > > > > Ok, so here is the list, as it stands currently, and it is > alphabetized too, > > lol: > > > > aglet, antipodean, azure

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Keith Whaley wrote: Doug Franklin wrote: On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:48:59 +1000, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: What an articulate bunch we are... We'd be _far_ less articulate if you'd lock up out thesauruses... Sighhh. That should be "OUR" thesauruses... keith keith whaley Superannuated. TTYL, Do

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Doug Franklin wrote: On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:48:59 +1000, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: What an articulate bunch we are... We'd be _far_ less articulate if you'd lock up out thesauruses... keith whaley Superannuated. TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

This guy's going on my Kill List. Wink. Bob W wrote: "Had you truly duffified the lexicon, mayhaps reading boustrophedonically for incremental velocity, and left it dwizzen as any dudman, you would have disinterred more than a yeepsen of prolixity. Nevertheless, as we yaffle our mundivagant liplabo

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

And I thought that dealing with eructations would make you go blind Cotty wrote: On 23/7/04, Tanya Mayer Photography, discombobulated, offered: eructations I had those once. The scarring is fearsome. Cheers, Cotty

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

--- Ryan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PS. Tom, there's actually a building coming up here > designed by Harry > Seidler called The Riparian. Supposedly going to be > the tallest building in > Brissie when it's finished.. Ryan While I'm sure Tom is interested in your story, "riparian" is a

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

--- Ryan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Balderdash is heaps of fun, one of the few games > better if played with > anal-retentive word freaks. Hey, Ryan (and Tom C., too), Howdya like to play Balderdash with Bob W.? Could you imagine?... cheers, frank = "The optimist thinks this is th

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

designed by Harry Seidler called The Riparian. Supposedly going to be the tallest building in Brissie when it's finished.. - Original Message - From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 6:59 AM Subject

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

uppose it was the most 'fun' way of keeping track of who's ahead). Great game, you oughta get it! Ryan - Original Message - From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 7:35 AM Subject: RE: OT

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

for that matter so does osculation and interdigitation. Herb - Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 8:22 PM Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Fi

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Redundant, >superfluous. I like to use them in the >> same sentence. > >Persnickity. Niggardly (that's a good one, because >it's taken the wrong way so often). Riparian (I won a >game of Balderdash once because o

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Bob W wrote: >"Had you truly duffified the lexicon, mayhaps reading boustrophedonically >for incremental velocity, and left it dwizzen as any dudman, you would >have disinterred more than a yeepsen of prolixity. Nevertheless, as we >yaffle our mundivagant liplabour like grimgribbers (sorry, Frank

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Bob W wrote: "Had you truly duffified the lexicon, mayhaps reading boustrophedonically for incremental velocity, and left it dwizzen as any dudman, you would have disinterred more than a yeepsen of prolixity. Nevertheless, as we yaffle our mundivagant liplabour like grimgribbers (sorry, Frank - I

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

The used spelling was indented. :-) nitesoJ - Original Message - From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 1:43 AM Subject: RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) > Did

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

On 23/7/04, Tanya Mayer Photography, discombobulated, offered: >eructations I had those once. The scarring is fearsome. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps _

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

On 22/7/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered: >Actually, I think Cotty has Word a Day Toilet Paper. >Some days he uses, like 10 or 15 big new words. Other >days, none. Depends what he ate the day before... > > > >cheers, >frank LOL Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

On 22/7/04, Tom C, discombobulated, offered: >Cotty, > >You must subcscribe to Merriam-Websters Word-a-Day? Bromide was today's >word. > > > >Tom C. Au contraire mon frere. I take my guidance from the archives of one Anthony Hancock. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

nstance, i feign innocence... hehe...) tan. -Original Message- From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 8:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) Gee... I always try to stay away from words th

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

ve Word Finder for this ridiculously verbose > paragraph. lol! > > hey, "verbose", there's another cool word... > > tan. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 7:26 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

That's a soliloquy if I've ever heard one. Tom C. From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 07

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

That's no fair... you just woke up fresh, and I've been at work for 7 hours now. :) Tom C. From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re:

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

's another cool word... tan. -Original Message- From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 7:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) I wish the remuneration I received for my photography was

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Petulance. frank theriault wrote: Subterfuge.

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

tling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank, > > Balderdash is my favorite game. I ~love~ Balderdash, but I'm quite horrible at it. I always lose, and at this point I don't even try to win. I try to make up funny

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

g that failing Cotty's word of the day toilet paper, he could emit a number of eructations that sound like never before invented words hehe. tan. -Original Message- From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 6:16 AM To: pentax list Subject: Re: OT: T

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank, > > Balderdash is my favorite game. I ~love~ Balderdash, but I'm quite horrible at it. I always lose, and at this point I don't even try to win. I try to make up funny definitions. The, the person whose turn it is laughs out loud when reading my de

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

I wish the remuneration I received for my photography was reciprocal to the effort. Tom C. From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Don't be that! Tom C. Obtuse. Love that one. Norm frank theriault wrote: --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Redundant, superfluous. I like to use them in the same sentence. Persnickity. Niggardly (that's a good one, because it's taken the wrong way so often). Riparian (I won a game of Bal

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cotty, > > You must subcscribe to Merriam-Websters Word-a-Day? > Bromide was today's > word. > Actually, I think Cotty has Word a Day Toilet Paper. Some days he uses, like 10 or 15 big new words. Other days, none. Depends what he ate the day before...

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Frank, Balderdash is my favorite game. Tom C. From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:59:44 -0400 (EDT) --- Tom C <[EMAIL

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

--- Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Obtuse. Love that one. > Norm > Subterfuge. -frank = "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer __

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Cotty, You must subcscribe to Merriam-Websters Word-a-Day? Bromide was today's word. Tom C. From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

my favorite: antipodean Christian

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Obtuse. Love that one. Norm frank theriault wrote: --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Redundant, superfluous. I like to use them in the same sentence. Persnickity. Niggardly (that's a good one, because it's taken the wrong way so often). Riparian (I won a game of Balderdash once beca

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Redundant, superfluous. I like to use them in the > same sentence. Persnickity. Niggardly (that's a good one, because it's taken the wrong way so often). Riparian (I won a game of Balderdash once because of that one). Gregarious. Ubiquitous. Tomfoolery

RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

Redundant, superfluous. I like to use them in the same sentence. Tom C. From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film) Date: Fri, 23 J

Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

On 23/7/04, Tanya Mayer Photography, discombobulated, offered: >Kismet! I love that word! I have this list of words that I just love. You >know words that just sound so cool when you say them? Some of my favourites >are: epiphany, azure, charisma, procrastinate, salubrious, titillate, >sensuali

OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film)

: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 1:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film For the shear kismet. William Robb wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "Jostein" >Subject: Re: not particularly

Re: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film

For the shear kismet. William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: "Jostein" Subject: Re: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film It's like having you brain smashed out by a slice of lemon wrapped round a Canon D60...:-) Why would anyone wrap a lemon around a lemon? William Robb

Re: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film

- Original Message - From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Why would anyone wrap a lemon around a lemon? > > At least it's a lemon that you can later add Gin to, and maybe some tonic > and IS cubes LOL. One needs the IS cubes to relieve the Pain tax on the head... nitesoJ (almost s

Re: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film

On 22/7/04, William Robb, discombobulated, offered: >> It's like having you brain smashed out by a slice of lemon wrapped >> round a Canon D60...:-) >> > >Why would anyone wrap a lemon around a lemon? At least it's a lemon that you can later add Gin to, and maybe some tonic and IS cubes

Re: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film

- Original Message - > From: "Jostein" > Subject: Re: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film > > It's like having you brain smashed out by a slice of lemon wrapped > > round a Canon D60...:-) > > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: not particularly Re: Digital vs Film

On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, William Robb wrote: > Why would anyone wrap a lemon around a lemon? Oooh, meow. Sharp claws there. Excellent :-) Chris