In a message dated 11/30/01 8:06:52 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Mafud, it seems it just depends on what the photographer
> photographs... if I shot studio-like shots, I would do manual flash of
> course. Since I don't, I almsot don't do manual flash. I am glad there
>
Mafud wrote:
Sac> Of course one can set it all up manually, but the last time I mentioned
Sac> "manual" flash there was an actual hiccup on the list.
^^^ :)
Sac> OK, besides me, how many PDML members shoot full manual flash (anytime)?
Well, for macro shots
>> That does suck. Is there an option on the camera to lock the aperture? The
>> CP990 has a variable aperture, but there's an option to lock it so it
>> simulates a constant aperture zoom. The Pz-1p has the same ability with
>> variable zooms.
>>
Sac> While I agree, no serious photographer
>OK, besides me, how many PDML members shoot full manual flash (anytime)?
Always a manual mode for any deliberate composiiton requiring flash.
No sense in having the sensor average off something I don't intend it
to use.
Collin
>Mafud
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * *
At 10:27 AM 11/29/01 -0500, Mafud wrote:
>In a message dated 11/28/01 11:05:20 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> > That does suck. Is there an option on the camera to lock the
> aperture? The
> > CP990 has a variable aperture, but there's an option to lock it so it
> >
In a message dated 11/28/01 11:05:20 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> That does suck. Is there an option on the camera to lock the aperture? The
> CP990 has a variable aperture, but there's an option to lock it so it
> simulates a constant aperture zoom. The Pz-1p has t
-2000 is total CRAP, UNUSABLE for anything but strong
daylight!
Friday, November 23, 2001, 5:48:02 PM, Chris wrote:
CB> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Kent Gittings wrote:
>> Sounds like the Minolta Dimage 5/7 is a whole lot better. It even
>> supports the ADI flash function introduced in t
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Kent Gittings wrote:
> Sounds like the Minolta Dimage 5/7 is a whole lot better. It even
> supports the ADI flash function introduced in the Maxxum 7 and the
> high speed sync of their later flashes. Plus the optics of the zoom
> lens is the same as their pro 35mm "G" line wh
ey haven't figured out
how to do a fast FPS at the highest rate.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frantisek Vlcek
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: why EI-2000 is total CRAP, UNUSABLE f
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:12:58 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi,
> I have finally extensively tested functions of EI-2000 in a
> friendly shop. Why is it total crap? Read more...
I'm glad you got a hands-on test. Informative sites such as
www.dpreview.com could have told you much of this information. I s
Hi,
I have finally extensively tested functions of EI-2000 in a
friendly shop. Why is it total crap? Read more...
It has slow lens (2.5-4) coupled with unusable 400 iso setting (the
noise is too much at iso 400). This calls for flash. But in all
digicams, internal flash sucks big t
11 matches
Mail list logo
