Dear List Members,
I think, that the Peircean truth is the similarity between the immediate and the dynamical object, achieved in the infinite future, and this similarity will be perfect (after indefinite time), when the only aspect, that tells it (the similarity) from sameness, is, that the
Jeff:
Parallelograms of forces about interacting electrical charges require a
spherical mode of description. Correspondingly, an explanation of spherical
forces requires categorial illations.
Can the diagram be extended to spheres?
Cheers
Jerry
> On Mar 17, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Jeffrey Brian
John, List
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 1:49 PM, John F Sowa wrote:
>
> But if we use some language with a finite alphabet and limit
> the theories to a finite specification, there are at most
> a countable number of theories.
>
> But there are two ways for a theory expressed in
Re:
CG:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00012.html
CG:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00111.html
Clark,
I've been trying to get back to the questions you raised
on your initial “Truth as Regulative or Real” thread and
again on this one, but there are a