[PEIRCE-L] Speculative Grammar and Phaneroscopy (was Signs, Types, and Tokens)

2021-11-12 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt
Bernard, List: These are interesting comments, and I have changed the subject line in the hope that we can have some further productive discussion about them. BM: There is also the rationale of the capacity to experiment the possible / impossible routes upon the ordered structure. This is the

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Signs, Types, and Tokens

2021-11-12 Thread Bernard Morand
Jon, list OK the main difference comes from our respective understandings for final and normal interpretant. Subsidiarily there may be a question of method too: the order of logical determinations is not , I think, the only rationale at stake for the second way of dividing signs. There is

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Signs, Types, and Tokens

2021-11-12 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt
Bernard, List: Just a quick follow-up--I outlined below what my proposed sequence for the last six trichotomies entails for the possible and necessitant classes, but here is what it entails for the existent classes. - An actuous (purpose of If is to produce action) can be a percussive (Id

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Guidelines for improving discussions

2021-11-12 Thread Robert Marty
I fully associate myself with this initiative which has the remarkable characteristic of adding an opening to Peirce-L without subtracting anything from it... it is perfectly justified, and it puts an end to a malaise which has lasted for too long... Le jeu. 11 nov. 2021 à 23:46, Edwina Taborsky