Jerry,
CSP did use divisions into three, so trichotomies do belong to his
philosophy. Only in his latest phase he devoted himself to developing
triadicity as his key concept in his theory of the Categories.
So, trichotomies of signs, such as icon, index, symbol etc. are OK. But
only for the
Gary, Kirsti, list,
You wrote, "I've been a little "out of it" post surgery, but did someone
earlier quote that passage? In any event, I can't find it in this thread."
I was referring to a post by Orliaguet from many years ago, but nobody
else quoted it in the thread. I tried a few years ago
Kirsti, Jerry, list,
Kirsti is generally correct. I remember years ago at peirce-l when
Orliaguet made the same point (with superfluous sarcasm) to Kirsti. He
quoted a passage by Peirce that required understanding the term "triad"
to refer to the three correlates in triadic action with one
List, Franklin, Frederik:
The OUP book,
The Structure of Objects
by Kathrin Koslicki (2008)
addresses some of the philosophy that appears to be difficult to understand.
More particularly, it illuminates the triad, sinsign, index and dicisign in
relation to parts of the whole, the illation
Jerry, list,
Jerry, you wrote:
The terms "coupling" and "grammar" are used in the senses of CSP. Coupling
> referring to CSP's paper on the logic of Copula. Grammar in the typical
> sense that that one may find in the classical text by Otto Jesperson, *The
> Philosophy of Grammar *or in CSP's
(This post was found in my email "Draft Box”. This response was drafted on Dec.
13 th, 2015.
Franklin, Matt, List:
Some short responses to your concerns and further questions are raised.
On Dec 12, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Franklin Ransom wrote:
> Jerry, list,
>
> Well, I'm glad that someone agrees
