'subjective, objective and general' - and these are not valid outlines of the
three categories.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Sungchul Ji
To: PEIRCE-L
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 5:29 PM
Subject: [biosemiotics:8992] Re: [PEIRCE-L] signs, correlates, and tr
; psychological nominals as 'subjective, objective and general' - and these
> are not valid outlines of the three categories.
>
> Edwina
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Sungchul Ji
> *To:* PEIRCE-L
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 02, 2015 5:29 PM
> *
to such
>> psychological nominals as 'subjective, objective and general' - and these
>> are not valid outlines of the three categories.
>>
>> Edwina
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> *From:* Sungchul Ji
>> *To:
with information science
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Sungchul Ji
To: PEIRCE-L
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [biosemiotics:8992] Re: [PEIRCE-L] signs, correlates, and
triadic relations
Edwina, Clark, John, lists
You wrote:
&q
entality,
Diversity,and Unification. World Scientific, New Jersey. Pp. 129-134.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
> Sung, your comment doesn't make any sense. Because Peirce's three
> categories don't correlate to the three worlds of Burgin an
mes, cells,
> brains, human societies, and the cosmos. In: *Unified Field Mechanics:
> Natural Science *
> *beyond the Veil of Spacetime* (R. Amoroso, P. Rowlands, and L. Kauffman,
> eds.)
> World Scientific, New Jersey, pp. 579-589.
>[3] Ji, S. (2012a) Isomorphism between Black
