therefore be a mind in an entirely different sense, it
would be a mind that cannot grow, that cannot form habits; it would be
the mere possibility of a mind, one where the law of mind would be a
mere incohate possibility.
cheers,
Martin Lefebvre
Martin, Joe, et al.,
25.9.2006 kello 19:4
d whose wealth grows indefinitely
through the constant arrival of new souls... It is almost as if
looking up in the sky can sometimes tell us something about what goes
on down here on earth...!!!
Martin Lefebvre
Martin -- ad Bill:
Martin, I find what you are saying both plausible and resulting
f the argument) that
Peirce, in the way he ordered the 4 methods, was already manifesting
some insight with regards to esthetics's connection to logic (though
somewhat unwittingly)...
Martin Lefebvre
Dear Joe,
Thanks for your response and the quote.
On second thoughts, informed with the quote y
facts but we have
no access to mere givens without
representation/observation") brings us back to the dreaded
Kantian ding-an-sich...
best,
Martin Lefebvre
Dear Martin,
Thanks for these comments. You
may well be right that I am introducing an
unnecessary psychological overlay to my account
ly) aware of their
interpretability: here, semiosis, the action of the sign, becomes
itself an object of our thought. In this case our
"consciousness" is merely a further interpretant of the
initial sign and of its triadic relation to the object and the
interpretant. Could it be, the
atures for the task at
hand. That Peirce asks his reader to "think in order to see"
he is asking that the proof become indubitable to him as well. No
other proof than that of perception/observation/experience is to be
had.
cheers,
Martin Lefebvre
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:37:58 +0100, Gary
reader to "think in order to see" he is asking that the
proof become indubitable to him as well. No other proof than that of
perception/observation/experience is to be had.
cheers,
Martin Lefebvre
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:37:58 +0100, Gary
Richmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Thomas Riese,
Thanks for your response. That Wiener link is surprising -- he even
mentions Luigi Pirandello! However, from the quote, it seems Peirce
had the British in mind... (which leaves Schiller and his
entourage...)
Martin Lefebvre
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber
ntury (see quote below).
Does anyone on this list know what publications he was refering
to?
Thanks in advance
Martin Lefebvre
From CP.5.414
"After awaiting in vain, for a good many years,
some particularly opportune conjuncture of circumstances that might
serve to recommend his notions of
on" may be related, at least in part, to the
arrival of the new trichotomy].
(**For instance, it is clear that an index is a degenerate
sign [as is an icon] and that a genuine index is not a pure
index)
(J'ai récemment rédigé un texte, en français, qui traite
de certaines de ces questi
ent is found in
lecture 6 of the Harvard Lectures when Peirce asserts:
"...perception being for the logician simply what experience,
that is, the succession of what happens to him, forces him to admit
immediately and without any reason."
Martin Lefebvre
J-Mo: > interesting notion in
this
11 matches
Mail list logo
