At 6:02 PM 1/22/96, Richard Ira Lavine wrote:
I thought maybe this list would have some ideas..
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 13:16:20 -0900
From: C. Oleson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reich questions
I may have the opp to do a radio interview with US Labor
This desert island argument is not good. A libertarian who believes that
the basis of property is desert would say that what I deserve is not just
what I can create on my own on a desert island, but also what I can
bargain for, using resources I have or have developed, and also that I
Howzabout:
"Secretary Reich, you are always going on about the need for more
and better job training and education. But what if there is
insufficient demand in the economy as a whole? Doesn't the
existence of a large reserve army of labor mean that those in work will
always be cowed into
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 17:37:46 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Kyle Hafar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (by way of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael I. Lichter))
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 11:20:15 -0600 (CST)
From: H-Net Central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Kamikaze Commitment"
POVERTY IN U.K. 'CAUSING MALNUTRITION'
The Observer
LONDON -- Mounting poverty during 16 years of Conservative
rule has produced malnutrition among Britons on a scale
unseen since the 1930s.
An unpublished government report leaked to The Observer
concludes that urgent action needs to be
On Tue, 23 Jan 1996, Breen, Nancy wrote:
* * *
I heard Sec. Reich on the Diane Rehm's (DC radio talk) show the other day.
He was discussing some suggestions to provide economic incentives for
corportations to be more socially responsible -- mostly through tax reforms.
This is an area
Would somebody please give us semi-econs a brief remedial on this
usage of "desert"? I'm getting a clue from context, but ...
Lisa
Justin Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
Or, if we are in a situation of differential ownership, this need not
be unjust if it arose by fair takings (based on
We are seeking references, advice, and answers in regard to the
extent to which, taken as a whole, taxes and transfers impact
income distribution outcomes in the United States. We are
interested not simply in the impact of federal policies but that of
federal, state, and local policies as a
At 5:58 AM 1/23/96, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Increasing intensity increases output because the AMOUNT of labor
increases. That's why it also increases necessary labor, and that's why it
does *not* increase productivity, which is when output increases WITHOUT an
increase in the AMOUNT of
Could someone here give me a quick figure *plus source* for
the percentage of the Federal Budget taken up by defense
(and perhaps closely related, eg "National Security") spending.
I think I've seen various figures given in left publications,
ranging from 18-25%. Thanks.
Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
if output/person-hour is the measure then it all depends on whether the per
hour output is constant, rising or falling.
Dear Professor Mitchell:
Here is an attempted reply; if it is incompetent, please be honest.
I am suggesting that the productivity measure should be
You will never get that number since quite a bit of it is hidden in
other agencies' budgets.
Could someone here give me a quick figure *plus source* for
the percentage of the Federal Budget taken up by defense
(and perhaps closely related, eg "National Security") spending.
I think I've seen
INTENSITY AND PRODUCTIVITY
Regarding the exchange between Jerry Levy and Blair
Sandler, it would seem that Blair is closer to Marx,
for whatever that is worth.
Quoting from _Capital_, Vol. I., Chap. 17, Sec. 2:
"Increased intensity of labor means increased
expenditure of labor in a
From: IN%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 20-JAN-1996 16:36:03.05
To: IN%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "POST-KEYNESIAN THOUGHT"
CC:
Subj: Monthly Review
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 Jan 1996 16:35:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 16:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
From:
"LYNN TURGEON, PROFESSOR EMERITUS OF
14 matches
Mail list logo
